{"id":26025,"date":"2016-04-20T11:00:08","date_gmt":"2016-04-20T01:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=26025"},"modified":"2016-04-20T11:27:38","modified_gmt":"2016-04-20T01:27:38","slug":"captain-obvious-on-the-future-submarine-cep","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/captain-obvious-on-the-future-submarine-cep\/","title":{"rendered":"Captain Obvious on the Future Submarine CEP"},"content":{"rendered":"
When I read material in the mainstream press about the Future Submarine, I can feel my eyeballs twitching a lot these days.<\/span><\/p>\n All the contenders (the government of Japan with support from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, TKMS of Germany and DCNS of France) have provided the same information, albeit in different ways, to the SEA 1000 competitive evaluation program office.<\/span><\/p>\n All three are required to have the following<\/span> build options<\/span><\/a> canvassed in their proposals: completely overseas build, a hybrid build between their respective home shipyards and Australia or a completely Australian build. So when I read r<\/span>eports<\/span><\/a> of<\/span> spokespeople<\/span><\/a> for the three contenders saying that they\u2019re happy to build all their boats in Australia, that eyeball twitch comes back.<\/span><\/p>\n Of course they\u2019re happy. I\u2019d be ecstatic if a government wanted to spend $50 billion with my company too. The Commonwealth is spending billions of taxpayer dollars for them to be happy about whatever and wherever they\u2019re told to build. You want it made in Adelaide, painted teal and made with<\/span> unobtanium<\/span><\/a>; Yes, Minister.<\/span><\/p>\n And they\u2019re <\/span>all<\/span><\/i> paper boats. Each option will be an evolution of a boat that each of the contenders already builds. Neither the Soryu, the Barracuda nor the Type 214 in their current forms are what the Royal Australian Navy wants or needs, thus the Australianised designs being put forward.<\/span><\/p>\n Any submarine engineer worth talking to will explain it\u2019s not as easy as simply doubling the circumference of the hull, taking out one bit and sticking another bit in or replacing lead acid batteries with lithium ion batteries. If submarines were that easy, every sea-faring nation would have them. They aren\u2019t, so they don\u2019t.<\/span><\/p>\n Defence Secretary<\/span> Dennis Richardson<\/span><\/a> has made it abundantly clear in his usual blunt style that he hasn\u2019t met representatives of any of the contenders, as then he would have to meet with them all. I can understand his reticence to become part of a marketing and engagement plan when he will have access to tender quality information from the program office instead.<\/span><\/p>\n The information vacuum created by a lack of detailed information from government and Defence is feeding upon itself. There were high hopes that the<\/span> 2016 Defence White Paper<\/span><\/a>, Defence Industry Policy Statement, and Integrated Investment Plan would fill the void. If anything, they have created more questions than answers. Where\u2019s the national shipbuilding plan? Where\u2019s the detailed website to support the IIP? What defence capabilities do you want to keep sovereign control over in a meaningful way?<\/span><\/p>\n