{"id":26443,"date":"2016-05-06T06:00:03","date_gmt":"2016-05-05T20:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=26443"},"modified":"2016-05-05T16:37:15","modified_gmt":"2016-05-05T06:37:15","slug":"making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"Making sense of the government&#8217;s defence industry policy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-26446\" title=\"Image courtesy of Flickr user Ben Watkin.\" src=\"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/236089266_d2de20aae0_z.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"481\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/236089266_d2de20aae0_z.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/236089266_d2de20aae0_z-205x154.jpg 205w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/>I\u2019ve been trying to understand the government\u2019s policy on defence industry. Having read the recent<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.defence.gov.au\/whitepaper\/Docs\/2016-Defence-Industry-Policy-Statement.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Defence Industry Policy Statement<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (DIPS) it seemed straightforward, but then I looked closely at the Prime Minister\u2019s recent announcement about submarines. Unless I\u2019m missing something, it looks like we have a fundamentally new policy even as the ink dries on the old one.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The 2016 DIPS is an unsurprising document. Like most government glossies, it talks up its big-ticket \u2018announcables\u2019. Specifically, $1.6 billion over ten years to establish:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">a Centre for Defence Industry Capability (CDIC) \u2018to drive the strategic partnership with Defence, involve industry in governance of the industry programs and provide a range of business and skilling services\u2019;<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">a Defence Innovation Hub \u2018to undertake collaborative innovation activities from initial concept, through prototyping and testing to introduction into service\u2019; and,<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">a Next Generations Technologies Fund \u00a0\u2018to invest in strategic technologies that have the potential to deliver game-changing capabilities\u2019.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The first two initiatives will be funded entirely by redirecting $870 million from existing programs. While there\u2019s some relabelling afoot, the joint defence industry CDIC is a new concept. The remaining $730 million for the technology fund will come from Defence\u2019s investment program. On the scale of defence spending, $73 million a year is a significant but not over-the-top investment in new technology.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So much for feeding the technology chickens; there are two other aspects to defence industry policy that are much more important. The first is ensuring that the ADF has access to the industry capabilities it needs. To this end, the existing Priority and Strategic Industry Capability framework will be replaced by a Sovereign Industrial Capability Assessment Framework \u2018to improve the identification and management of the sovereign industrial capabilities that develop and support our ADF capabilities\u2019. In addition, industry has been recognised as a Fundamental Input to Capability with the goal of driving \u2018more formal consideration of industry impacts through the early stages of the capability development life cycle\u2019. Responsibility for doing so will fall on the Capability Managers (a.k.a the service chiefs and the Vice Chief of the Defence Force) who will be assisted by the CDIC.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The test of this new approach will come with the new Defence Industrial Capability Plan, promised for 2017, with sovereign industrial capabilities identified through a \u2018collaborative process between Defence and the CDIC\u2019. Past attempts to identify key defence industry capabilities have succumbed to special pleading by incumbents in a case of \u2018we have to do what we do because it\u2019s what we do\u2019. The stronger role of industry in the new process can only increase the influence of existing firms.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The other critical question for defence industry policy is how much preference will be given to local suppliers. In the 1980s and 90s we had explicit programs, such as the Australian Industry Involvement scheme, that favoured local suppliers irrespective of cost. More recently, however, governments have taken a more economically rational approach that saw equipment purchased off-the-shelf from overseas while creating opportunities for local firms to bid competitively into global supply chains.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The new DIPS maintains the existing overarching approach to defence procurement. That is, apart from sovereign requirements, decisions will \u2018seek to achieve the best value for money\u2019 with consideration of \u2018opportunities to maximise internationally competitive Australian industry involvement\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Thus, in terms of what matters, the new DIPS reflects continuity. There\u2019s no changed preference for local suppliers, and the arrangements for managing sovereign industry capabilities aren\u2019t markedly different to the old ones for priority\/strategic industry capabilities. If there has been a noteworthy change, it\u2019s probably the extra $73 million a year to invest in \u2018game-changing technologies\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">But defence industry policy is a slippery beast. It\u2019s always possible to hide a preference for local suppliers behind a fig leaf of preserving sovereign capability. Moreover, if firms bidding for defence contracts think there\u2019s an advantage in offering high local content, they\u2019ll happily do so and pass on the costs. For these reasons, the government\u2019s actual procurement decisions, and how it explains those decisions, are every bit as important as its declared policy. Which brings us to the submarine announcement.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When asked about local content in the submarine program,<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.pm.gov.au\/media\/2016-04-26\/doorstop-minister-defence-marise-payne-minister-industry-christopher-pyne-and-chief\" target=\"_blank\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">the Prime minister said<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2018I am determined that every dollar we spend on defence procurement as far as possible should be spent in Australia, and our commitment to that is precisely for the reasons that Marise and I and Christopher and the Vice-Admiral have spoken about. Because when we invest in Australian industry and jobs, Australian technology, we are strengthening our whole economy.\u2019<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Apart from expressing an unqualified preference for local suppliers in stark contradiction to the DIPS, the Prime Minister stressed the economic benefits of doing so. It wasn\u2019t an isolated mention; the same point is made at three other points during the announcement. Yet, the DIPS says absolutely nothing\u2014not a single mention\u2014about using defence procurement to build a stronger economy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It\u2019s not that there\u2019s an iron-clad strategic argument for building submarines in Australia, otherwise the government wouldn\u2019t have asked for offshore and hybrid options from the contenders. Rather, a judgement has been made that the cost premium for local production, which the<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.skynews.com.au\/news\/top-stories\/2016\/04\/27\/creation-of-3000-jobs-after-dcns-sub-contract.html\" target=\"_blank\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">government concedes<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> exists, is outweighed by economic and other benefits. That might be the case, but it\u2019s not reassuring that the government refuses to disclose the cost premium or to release the<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/parlinfo.aph.gov.au\/parlInfo\/download\/committees\/estimate\/ccd356c8-c0d3-4c37-8141-45a7eee302e9\/toc_pdf\/Foreign%20Affairs,%20Defence%20and%20Trade%20Legislation%20Committee_2016_03_03_4242_Official.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf#search=%22committees\/estimate\/ccd356c8-c0d3-4c37-8141-45a7eee302e9\/0000%22\" target=\"_blank\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">economic impact report<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> it commissioned on the submarines (at a cost of $387,000). If it\u2019s such a good deal, why are we being kept in the dark?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There\u2019s no denying that there were political factors behind the submarine decision, but that doesn\u2019t mean that there hasn\u2019t been an important change in policy; it merely explains why. Mindful of what the Prime Minister said in Adelaide, future bidders for defence contracts will be packing in as much local content as they can, with the risks borne by the ADF and the costs by taxpayers.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I\u2019ve been trying to understand the government\u2019s policy on defence industry. Having read the recent Defence Industry Policy Statement (DIPS) it seemed straightforward, but then I looked closely at the Prime Minister\u2019s recent announcement about &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":26446,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[126,1636,413],"class_list":["post-26443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-defence-industry","tag-defence-white-paper-2016","tag-procurement"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v19.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Making sense of the government&#039;s defence industry policy | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Making sense of the government&#039;s defence industry policy | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I\u2019ve been trying to understand the government\u2019s policy on defence industry. Having read the recent Defence Industry Policy Statement (DIPS) it seemed straightforward, but then I looked closely at the Prime Minister\u2019s recent announcement about ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-05-05T20:00:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-05T06:37:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/236089266_d2de20aae0_z.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"376\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Mark Thomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Mark Thomson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI&#039;s analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/236089266_d2de20aae0_z.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/236089266_d2de20aae0_z.jpg\",\"width\":500,\"height\":376},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/\",\"name\":\"Making sense of the government's defence industry policy | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-05-05T20:00:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-05T06:37:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/cea5301d66288d1e898acb13e48f40cd\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Making sense of the government&#8217;s defence industry policy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/cea5301d66288d1e898acb13e48f40cd\",\"name\":\"Mark Thomson\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bd29fe5d57ace7a0cb6fea66808c7e20?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bd29fe5d57ace7a0cb6fea66808c7e20?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Mark Thomson\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/mark-thomson\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Making sense of the government's defence industry policy | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Making sense of the government's defence industry policy | The Strategist","og_description":"I\u2019ve been trying to understand the government\u2019s policy on defence industry. Having read the recent Defence Industry Policy Statement (DIPS) it seemed straightforward, but then I looked closely at the Prime Minister\u2019s recent announcement about ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2016-05-05T20:00:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-05T06:37:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":500,"height":376,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/236089266_d2de20aae0_z.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Mark Thomson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Mark Thomson","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI&#039;s analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/236089266_d2de20aae0_z.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/236089266_d2de20aae0_z.jpg","width":500,"height":376},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/","name":"Making sense of the government's defence industry policy | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2016-05-05T20:00:03+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-05T06:37:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/cea5301d66288d1e898acb13e48f40cd"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/making-sense-of-the-governments-defence-industry-policy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Making sense of the government&#8217;s defence industry policy"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/cea5301d66288d1e898acb13e48f40cd","name":"Mark Thomson","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bd29fe5d57ace7a0cb6fea66808c7e20?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bd29fe5d57ace7a0cb6fea66808c7e20?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Mark Thomson"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/mark-thomson\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26443"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26443"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26443\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26447,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26443\/revisions\/26447"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26446"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}