{"id":27155,"date":"2016-06-15T12:30:20","date_gmt":"2016-06-15T02:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=27155"},"modified":"2016-06-15T11:17:21","modified_gmt":"2016-06-15T01:17:21","slug":"obamas-bitter-afghan-legacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/obamas-bitter-afghan-legacy\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama\u2019s bitter Afghan legacy"},"content":{"rendered":"
Nearly 15 years after its launch, the United States\u2019 war in Afghanistan is still raging, making it the longest war in American history. Nowadays, the war is barely on the world\u2019s radar, with only dramatic developments, like America\u2019s recent drone-strike assassination of Afghan Taliban Chief Akhtar Mohammad Mansour, getting airtime. But Afghans<\/span> continue to lose<\/span><\/a> their friends, neighbours, and children to conflict, as they have since the 1979 Soviet invasion, which triggered the refugee exodus that brought the parents of Omar Mateen, the killer of 49 people in a nightclub in Orlando, to the US.<\/span><\/p>\n America\u2019s invasion, launched by former President George W. Bush in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terror attacks, was intended to dismantle Al Qaeda and remove the Taliban from power, thereby ensuring that Afghanistan would no longer serve as a safe base of operations for extremists. With those goals ostensibly accomplished, Bush\u2019s successor, Barack Obama, reduced troop levels in the country, even<\/span> declaring<\/span><\/a> a year and a half ago that the war was \u2018coming to a responsible conclusion.\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n But, with a resurgent Taliban stepping up attacks, the war has raged on, exacting staggering costs in blood and treasure. One key reason is Pakistan, which has harboured the Afghan Taliban\u2019s command and control, while pretending to be a US ally.<\/span><\/p>\n If there were any doubts about Pakistan\u2019s<\/span> duplicity<\/span><\/a>, they should have been eliminated in 2011, when Osama bin Laden was killed in a military garrison town near the country\u2019s capital. Yet, five years later, Pakistan still has not revealed who helped bin Laden hide for all those years. Meanwhile, the Obama administration has continued to shower the country with billions of dollars in aid.<\/span><\/p>\n The assassination of Mansour on Pakistan\u2019s territory, near its border with Iran and Afghanistan, has exposed, yet again, the deceitfulness of Pakistani officials, who have repeatedly denied sheltering Taliban leaders. Like the raid by US Navy SEALs that killed bin Laden, Mansour\u2019s assassination required the US to violate the sovereignty of a country that, as one of the largest recipients of American aid, should have been supporting the effort. The question is whether the US will acknowledge the obvious lesson this time and change course.<\/span><\/p>\n While Mansour\u2019s killing may be, as Obama<\/span> put it<\/span><\/a>, \u2018an important milestone\u2019 in the effort to bring peace to Afghanistan, it also exposed America\u2019s policy failures under the Obama administration, rooted in the desire not to confront either Pakistan or even the Taliban too strongly.<\/span> Obama\u2019s objective was to preserve the option of reaching a Faustian bargain with the Taliban\u2014a power-sharing arrangement to underpin a peace deal\u2014facilitated by the Pakistani military. That is why the US has not branded the Afghan Taliban\u2014much less <\/span>Pakistan\u2019s rogue intelligence agency, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI)\u2014<\/span>a<\/span> terrorist organization<\/span><\/a>, and instead has<\/span> engaged<\/span><\/a> in semantic jugglery.<\/span><\/p>\n This approach goes beyond rhetoric. America took almost 15 years to carry out its first drone strike in Pakistan\u2019s sprawling Balochistan province, even though the Afghan Taliban leadership established its command-and-control structure there almost immediately after the US military intervention ousted it from Afghanistan. Instead, the US concentrated its drone strikes in Pakistan\u2019s Waziristan region, allowing the Taliban leaders to remain ensconced.<\/span><\/p>\n The US has even made direct overtures to the Taliban, in order to promote negotiations aimed at securing peace through a power-sharing arrangement. It allowed the Taliban to set up a <\/span>de facto<\/span><\/i> diplomatic mission in Doha, Qatar, in 2013. A year later, it traded five senior Taliban leaders who had been jailed at Guant\u00e1namo Bay for a captured US Army sergeant.<\/span><\/p>\n What the US did not know was that the Taliban\u2019s founder, Mullah Mohammed Omar, died in<\/span> 2013<\/span><\/a> in a hospital in the Pakistani city of Karachi. Omar\u2019s death was kept<\/span> secret<\/span><\/a> for more than two years, during which time ISI <\/span>claimed to be facilitating contacts with him.<\/span><\/p>\n Finally, last July, Mansour was installed as the Taliban\u2019s new leader\u2014<\/span>and he was not interested in peace talks. It was Mansour\u2019s intransigence that spurred the US to change its tactics. Instead of using carrots to secure Taliban support for a peace deal, the Obama administration is now using very large sticks.<\/span><\/p>\n But even if this approach manages to bring the Taliban to the negotiating table, it will probably not be enough to secure a<\/span> lasting peace deal. If the US is to succeed at ending the war in Afghanistan, it must do more than change tactics; it must rethink its fundamental strategy.<\/span><\/p>\n The reality is that the<\/span> medieval<\/span><\/a> Taliban will neither be defeated nor seek peace until their Pakistani sanctuaries are eliminated. No counterterrorism campaign has ever succeeded in a country when the militants have found refuge in another. While Obama<\/span> recognizes<\/span><\/a> the imperative of eliminating terrorist sanctuaries, he has failed to do what is needed.<\/span><\/p>\n Simply put, bribing Pakistan\u2019s military will not work. Over the last 14 years, the US has given Pakistan more than $33 billion in<\/span> aid<\/span><\/a> and armed it with lethal weapons,<\/span> ranging<\/span><\/a> from F-16s and P-3C Orion maritime aircraft to Harpoon anti-ship missiles and TOW anti-armour missiles. And yet Pakistan continues to provide the Afghan Taliban a safe haven within its borders.<\/span><\/p>\n A better approach would be to link aid disbursement to concrete Pakistani action against militants, while officially classifying ISI as a terrorist entity. Such a move would send a strong signal to Pakistan\u2019s military\u2014which views the Taliban and other militant groups as useful proxies and<\/span> force multipliers<\/span><\/a> vis-\u00e0-vis Afghanistan and India\u2014that it can no longer hunt with the hounds and run with the foxes.<\/span><\/p>\n