{"id":27804,"date":"2016-07-21T13:00:08","date_gmt":"2016-07-21T03:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=27804"},"modified":"2018-10-30T09:25:45","modified_gmt":"2018-10-29T22:25:45","slug":"the-three-brexiteers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-three-brexiteers\/","title":{"rendered":"The Three Brexiteers"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
Any hopes that the swiftly-engineered coronation of Theresa May meant the Brits were going soft on Brexit have been squashed by the instant elevation of a trio of hardened eurosceptics\u2014Boris Johnson, Liam Fox and David Davis. With three Brexiteers running the Foreign Office, the new Ministry of Trade and London\u2019s Brexit negotiations, the UK Prime Minister\u2019s intentions are clear: there\u2019s no turning back.<\/span><\/p>\n The key appointment isn\u2019t Johnson\u2019s, but<\/span> Davis<\/span><\/a>\u2019; now officially \u2018Secretary of State for Leaving the European Union\u2019. Just three days before his appointment, this 2005 Tory leadership contender<\/span> published<\/span><\/a> a prescient strategy for Brexit, which should be compulsory reading in foreign affairs ministries. It\u2019s a full-throated exposition of the Brexiteers\u2019 global free-trade manifesto, it pitches UK as the new go-getter on the world stage, and it fires a warning shot straight across the EU\u2019s bow.<\/span><\/p>\n Critically, Davis\u2019 appointment looks like nixing the soft-Brexit option, which would try to fudge UK\u2019s exit and leave UK essentially inside the EU Single Market. Instead, EU leaders will face someone who isn\u2019t in a rush, believes he holds the best negotiating cards, and won\u2019t sign up to anything resembling the<\/span> \u2018Norway Option\u2019<\/span><\/a> for UK\u2019s future role in Europe.<\/span><\/p>\n Two key elements stand out immediately: first, Davis\u2019 insistence on an immigration system than allows UK to control numbers; second, his insistence that UK must halt then reverse EU-derived market and product regulation. These aren\u2019t negotiating points, but a new vision for how the political economy of post-Brexit UK will work.<\/span> To Davis<\/span><\/a>, lower migration means higher wage rates for \u2018\u2026 the great British industrial working classes [who] voted overwhelmingly for Brexit,\u2019 and less regulation means faster economic growth.<\/span><\/p>\n Neither of these two objectives are compatible with membership of the<\/span> European Economic Area<\/span><\/a> (EEA). And while Davis\u2019 stated goal is \u2018tariff free access to the Single Market\u2019, he, like Andrea Leadsom, isn\u2019t afraid to have his bluff called by EU. Davis makes clear that UK can calmly contemplate trading with EU on World Trade Organisation (WTO) terms by using customs duties on EU imports to indirectly assist industry.<\/span><\/p>\n In any case, if push really came to shove, UK industry would do comparatively well out of reverting to WTO rule on its EU trade. With big deficits across its four-biggest EU trading categories\u2014vehicles (-\u00a328.5 billion), mechanical & machinery (-\u00a310.5 billion), electrical equipment (-\u00a310.2 billion) and pharmaceuticals (-\u00a36.5 billion)\u2014even the hint of tariffs will see industrial investment surging back into UK. May\u2019s government has a strong hand to play, and her Brexit minister knows it.<\/span><\/p>\n So what do these appointments mean for the rest of the world? The first point is that UK is likely to become outward looking very quickly. Countries like China, India, Canada, Australia and New Zealand will be receiving calls from Liam Fox\u2019s new Trade Ministry asking how quickly they can put together trade delegations\u2014and in the case of latter three, how quickly they can loan the UK the negotiators themselves. Malcolm Turnbull has already<\/span> indicated<\/span><\/a> Australia\u2019s willingness to \u201cget moving on [trade talks] quickly.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Incidentally, the US probably won\u2019t be at the front of the trade-agreement queue. That\u2019s not out of<\/span> pique<\/span><\/a>, but simply because the US is already the UK\u2019s<\/span> biggest single<\/span><\/a> trade partner, generating surpluses of \u00a310 billion per year in goods, and a whopping \u00a35.8 billion per quarter in services. The UK won\u2019t disturb that trade relationship in a hurry, and certainly not until its trade teams have gained experience.<\/span><\/p>\n For countries like Australia, however, the opportunity is there for the taking, in particular in agriculture. Unwinding the subsidies and protections that form part of the<\/span> Common Agricultural Policy<\/span><\/a> will be excruciating, but it will happen. Unlike EEA countries, the UK has a long history of preferencing cheap food over country lifestyles, from the 1906 \u2018<\/span>Cheap Loaf\u2019<\/span><\/a> election to the 1846<\/span> Repeal of the Corn Laws<\/span><\/a>. Freed from the EU\u2019s high agricultural tariff rates\u2014where averages range between<\/span> 8% and 18%,<\/span><\/a> and often reach dizzying heights\u2014UK has plenty to offer antipodean wine, beef, grain and dairy exporters.<\/span><\/p>\n The second take-away is that UK\u2019s economic prospects have more pluses than might appear. With policy in the hands of free-traders, UK business will anticipate greater access to world markets, as fast as the UK can deliver. Global foreign direct investment that once flowed seamlessly past UK to continental Europe will have to think again, at least until the UK\u2019s divorce comes through. And with Sterling settling at around 14% lower against its 2015 dollar average, exporters have an immediate adrenalin shot.<\/span><\/p>\n