{"id":27832,"date":"2016-07-25T06:00:02","date_gmt":"2016-07-24T20:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=27832"},"modified":"2016-07-25T00:34:32","modified_gmt":"2016-07-24T14:34:32","slug":"oz-strategists-paul-dibb","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/oz-strategists-paul-dibb\/","title":{"rendered":"Oz strategists: Paul Dibb"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
Starting as a geographer, Paul Dibb became\u00a0one of Australia\u2019s great strategists.<\/span><\/p>\n The discipline of geography is vital to the Dibb understanding of power, strategy and defence planning. For Dibb, geography disciplines strategy in the same way that you’re not discussing defence until you’re talking dollars.<\/span><\/p>\n In one of my first radio interviews with Paul<\/span>\u2014<\/span>35 years ago<\/span>\u2014<\/span>on the Soviet Union and the Baltic states, he sat with the atlas in his lap, summoning thoughts via his eyes and hands on the map.<\/span><\/p>\n Maps matter in the Dibb universe. And his understanding of Australia\u2019s geography has profoundly shaped strategy. See Dibb\u2019s key map representing \u2018Australia\u2019s regional security interests\u2019 from the Dibb Report, the 1986<\/span> Review of Australia\u2019s Defence Capabilities.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n This map has been the terrain for wars that have raged through Canberra for decades. The arguments can ascend towards the arcane, but big decisions and dollars and careers are in play.<\/span><\/p>\n In the conceptualising and understanding of Australian defence, Paul Dibb has been as important as the best defence ministers of his time. That means his impact has been more enduring than a lot of recent defence ministers.<\/span><\/p>\n Dibb is accused of geographic determinism. Others mean this as an insult. He embraces geography as the tool that orders much else, enabling Australia to tell the difference between broad interests and vital interests. Strategic geography is the iron discipline.<\/span><\/p>\n Key Dibb ideas (drawing strongly on his 1986 report):<\/span><\/p>\n Canberra\u2019s rolling Dibb wars are gathered in one volume, in the fine ANU tradition of honouring the vertical man rather than the horizontal man. The essays in honour of Paul Dibb, \u2018Geography, Power, Strategy & Defence\u2019 can be found for free\u00a0<\/span>here<\/span><\/a> and all the battles are recounted.<\/span><\/p>\n For Army, Dibb was a swear word. The counter-arguments were many: Dibb\u2019s regionalism versus globalisation or Dibb\u2019s geography-based defence of Australia versus the Army\u2019s expeditionary tradition of going far afield in support of big allies. And what had Dibb\u2019s geographic obsession to say of 9\/11 and the George W. \u2018war on terrorism\u2019?<\/span><\/p>\n As Geoff Barker writes, the Dibb view is widely criticised \u2018by those who support the creation of heavily armoured Australian expeditionary defence forces capable of deploying to distant theatres and aggressively supporting the US in contingency planning for global war.\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n Kim Beazley says Dibb was a lightning rod for \u2018brutal\u2019 debates, but he made a significant contribution to Australia’s national defence: \u2018His legacy remains real. It endures.\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n One other bit of geography. Paul Dibb comes from a mining village in Yorkshire. In the definition and discovery of the strategic meaning of Oz geography, Captain<\/span> James Cook<\/span><\/a> \u00a0is the most important Yorkshireman; Dr P. Dibb, AO, is second.<\/span><\/p>\n\n