{"id":27893,"date":"2016-07-27T06:00:04","date_gmt":"2016-07-26T20:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=27893"},"modified":"2016-07-26T13:16:30","modified_gmt":"2016-07-26T03:16:30","slug":"civil-society-terrorism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/civil-society-terrorism\/","title":{"rendered":"Civil society against terrorism"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
After the terror attacks in Paris last November\u2014a carefully coordinated series of assaults carried out by multiple attackers, resulting in 130 deaths\u2014there was intense pain and fear, but also a spirit of unity and resilience. By contrast, since the Bastille Day massacre in Nice\u2014where an attacker, having received help from five men better described as criminals than as radical Islamists, barreled a truck into a crowd, killing 84 people, many of them children\u2014the dominant feelings seem to be impotence and anger.<\/span><\/p>\n The French are now frustrated and anxious. They are used to some semblance of security in their cities, which have long been bastions of knowledge and art, not sites of relentless terror. They want to feel safe again\u2014whatever it takes. These feelings are entirely understandable, but they don\u2019t necessarily contribute to effective decision-making.<\/span><\/p>\n The ‘whatever it takes’ is the problem. If people feel that their leaders are failing to protect them, they may turn to more radical alternatives; already, populist and even overtly racist political parties are gaining traction in France and elsewhere. Urged on by such forces, people may even decide to take the law into their own hands.<\/span><\/p>\n But the authorities already have a lot on their plate. Trying to protect a population from terrorist attacks while upholding the rule of law is, after all, a very difficult task. Individuals, particularly those with mental disorders and a broad interest in violence, can become radicalized quickly, as occurred with the Nice attacker. They may not have committed any crimes, nor established actual ties to terrorist groups, before launching a major attack. Given this, the French authorities can provide no guarantee against further attacks.<\/span><\/p>\n This is not to say that the authorities should not be pushed to improve their prevention and response tactics. There is plenty that can and must be done to strengthen security in France and elsewhere. But the ultimatum that some French are now implicitly presenting\u2014guarantee absolute security or watch us cast aside the rule of law and basic principles of openness and equality\u2014does more harm than good.<\/span><\/p>\n The French, like all people, deserve to feel safe walking down the street, going out to dinner, enjoying a concert, celebrating a national holiday, and just living their lives. The question is how to restore that sense of security at a time when the risk of a terrorist attack cannot be fully eliminated.<\/span><\/p>\n The answer lies with civil society. Ordinary citizens should become more alert to the signs of radicalization, and more educated on how to respond. People should be encouraged to report the possible radicalization of those close to them to the relevant authorities, whether psychiatric professionals or the police.<\/span><\/p>\n The goal is not to revive McCarthyism, with people making unsubstantiated accusations against neighbors and friends. Rather, it is to create channels through which people who recognize radical or violent leanings in someone they know can report their concerns. Beyond giving law enforcement a chance to prevent a serious attack, such contributions from civil society could help to reinforce citizens\u2019 willingness to leave anti-terror operations and policies to the authorities.<\/span><\/p>\n