{"id":27898,"date":"2016-07-27T14:30:27","date_gmt":"2016-07-27T04:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=27898"},"modified":"2016-07-26T13:51:05","modified_gmt":"2016-07-26T03:51:05","slug":"deterrence-cyberspace-different-domain-different-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/deterrence-cyberspace-different-domain-different-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"Deterrence in cyberspace: different domain, different rules"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Image<\/p>\n

Cyberspace pervades everyday life. Our growing reliance on networks has increased the vulnerability of Australia\u2019s national security, economy and society to malicious cyber actions. As a result, there\u2019s a need to build trust and confidence in cyberspace, and the infrastructure and institutions that it enables and supports.<\/span><\/p>\n

Deterrence policies and capabilities are often invoked as a means to create this stability. Australia\u2019s recent<\/span> Cyber Security Strategy<\/span><\/a>, released in April 2016, stated that \u2018Australia\u2019s defensive and offensive cyber capabilities enable us to deter and respond to the threat of cyber attack\u2019. In launching the Strategy, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull further<\/span> emphasised<\/span><\/a> that \u2018acknowledging this offensive capability, adds a level of deterrence\u2019. This rhetorical trend is also evident in other international cyber strategies including those of our major allies and partners.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, there are pit falls in that approach to cybersecurity. In our report, <\/span>Deterrence in Cyberspace, <\/span><\/i>released today<\/span>, <\/span><\/i>we explore those issues and provide recommendations for policymakers to address stability and security in cyberspace.<\/span><\/p>\n

The use of deterrence to mitigate security threats is based on an assumption that states are rational, and make decisions based on cost-benefit assessments. On that assumption, one can deter a challenger by increasing the perceived costs of their action (deterrence by punishment) or decreasing the expected benefit (deterrence by denial).<\/span><\/p>\n

However, threatening punishment is unlikely to deter malicious behaviour in cyberspace, for several reasons:<\/span><\/p>\n