{"id":28139,"date":"2016-08-12T11:00:52","date_gmt":"2016-08-12T01:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=28139"},"modified":"2016-08-12T12:03:55","modified_gmt":"2016-08-12T02:03:55","slug":"forgotten-actor-australias-counterterrorism-plans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/forgotten-actor-australias-counterterrorism-plans\/","title":{"rendered":"The forgotten actor in Australia\u2019s counterterrorism plans"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n Malcolm Turnbull has requested that Australia\u2019s counterterrorism agencies develop a strategy to prevent rapidly radicalised terrorists from carrying out Nice-style attacks in public areas. Senior sources have told The Australian<\/em><\/a> that the Prime Minister is particularly concerned about an attack that uses a vehicle as a weapon, which could cause devastating casualties.<\/p>\n Prime Minister Turnbull has directed counterterrorism coordinator Greg Moriarty to quickly identify lessons for Australia arising from the Bastille Day attack in Nice. In particular, Moriarty will advise government on how vulnerable Australia\u2019s public areas are, and how authorities can protect open areas where large numbers congregate. Given the history of mass-casualty terrorist attacks on soft targets , it\u2019s absolutely critical Australia looks to protect such venues and spaces.<\/p>\n But our record in this area is mixed: it’s not clear that we’ve got a nationally consistent approach to safeguarding mass gatherings, despite the publication five years ago<\/a> (PDF) of national guidelines by the National Counter-Terrorism Committee.<\/p>\n Mass gathering protection is fundamentally focused on counterterrorism and public safety. As the public\u2019s vulnerability at such events is high, the level of residual risk to places of mass gatherings\u2014such as sporting events and entertainment precincts\u2014is more often much higher than other infrastructure, such as power stations, transport or water facilities. Compared to infrastructure protection, it\u2019s probably fair to say that protecting mass gatherings has been the area least amenable to national leadership.<\/p>\n Some jurisdictions \u00a0have seen the problem simply as one of community policing and working with those responsible for occupational health and safety issues.<\/p>\n We need a nationally consistent approach when it comes to information sharing and pooling of knowledge between business and governments at all levels on this issue. It’s helpful that we have a Mass Gatherings Advisory Group<\/a> (MGAG) that sits under the Australian New Zealand Counter\u2013Terrorism Committee, and the Mass Gatherings Business Advisory Group, that feeds into the MGAG.<\/p>\n But the forgotten actor here is local government: when it comes to consequence management, resilience lives locally, so the importance of local government shouldn’t be overlooked.<\/p>\n Australia has about 560 local government bodies<\/a>\u2014and their responsibilities go well beyond the traditional functions of rates, roads and rubbish. While the states have the primary responsibility for most emergencies, it\u2019s at the local level where responders will be first on the scene.<\/p>\n Local government can promote the importance of security at places of mass gathering within their communities. It can also promote a nationally consistent approach to protecting places of mass gathering at the local level.<\/p>\n The Nice attack showed that it’s not always capital cities that are the location of attacks. When you get out of Australia’s major cities, local government is really the primary governance actor in many of our regional areas. For instance, they’re heavily involved in approvals for major events, such as festivals, sports carnivals and working with police, contractors and the private security sector. They’re often responsible for road closures and CCTV in areas where there’s public safety risks.<\/p>\n Local government is the level of government closest to where the population lives and works. It’s responsible for the provision or coordination of local resources. There\u2019s little doubt that terrorist attacks will occur in local government areas and will have a direct social, economic, psychological and cultural impact on that local area.<\/p>\n It\u2019s unclear what involvement local government believes it currently has in counterterrorism planning, prevention and response or what role the federal government sees for local government in counterterrorism planning, prevention and response.\u00a0Local government isn\u2019t mentioned in the most recent COAG national counter terrorism strategy<\/a> (PDF), nor in the guidelines on the protection of places of mass gathering from terrorism.<\/p>\n