{"id":28532,"date":"2016-09-12T11:00:39","date_gmt":"2016-09-12T01:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=28532"},"modified":"2016-09-08T11:50:27","modified_gmt":"2016-09-08T01:50:27","slug":"comes-natural-disaster-resilience-lets-not-short-change-mitigation-efforts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/comes-natural-disaster-resilience-lets-not-short-change-mitigation-efforts\/","title":{"rendered":"When it comes to natural disaster resilience, let’s not short-change mitigation efforts"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
Touring flood-affected Tasmania in June this year, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull warned that natural disasters will become more severe as climate change worsens.<\/p>\n
He emphasised<\/a> the need for greater mitigation measures: ‘we have to be very alert to natural disasters and\u2026 the importance to make a greater commitment right across Australia to ensuring that we have the measures in place to mitigate the impact of natural disasters’.<\/p>\n The importance of mitigation as a key element of a long-term plan for how we prepare for natural disasters was my key message to over 2000 representatives of Australia’s emergency management industry at the Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council (AFAC) conference in Brisbane recently<\/a>.<\/p>\n I addressed several challenges. Betterment\u2014that’s rebuilding an asset to a more disaster-resilient standard\u2014is rarely undertaken in Australia. It\u2019s our practice to rebuild damaged infrastructure to its original state after disaster hits, rather making choices that might involve making our roads higher, bridges stronger, relocating rail lines and even, in some areas, duplicating electricity lines.<\/p>\n The key finding of the Productivity Commission\u2019s December 2014 report on natural disaster<\/a> funding arrangements was that 97% of disaster funding is spent after a disaster and only 3% goes toward mitigation and preparedness.<\/p>\n That equation needs to be rebalanced. The economic costs of rebuilding communities is shared by all Australians when Commonwealth funds are dispersed for recovery.<\/p>\n The Commission\u2019s report made some very sensible suggestions as to why we should be boosting investment in disaster prevention: our economy won\u2019t suffer as much damage in a disaster, we can unlock productivity gains, and importantly, homeowners and businesses should pay less for insurance as their risk drops.<\/p>\n Investing in a range of measures, such as flood mitigation infrastructure and programs that strengthen homes in cyclone prone regions, will protect life and property, save taxpayer dollars and grow the economy.<\/p>\n The Commission\u2019s central recommendation was that the federal government significantly increase its mitigation funding to $200 million a year.<\/p>\n That would be a smart investment. The onus is now on the Turnbull government to act on the Commission\u2019s final report. The government\u2019s only action to date has been to refer findings to the states<\/a> for consultation.<\/p>\n