{"id":2944,"date":"2012-12-11T11:00:45","date_gmt":"2012-12-11T01:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=2944"},"modified":"2012-12-12T08:42:00","modified_gmt":"2012-12-11T22:42:00","slug":"getting-carried-away-britains-new-aircraft-carriers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/getting-carried-away-britains-new-aircraft-carriers\/","title":{"rendered":"Getting carried away: Britain’s new aircraft carriers"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"A<\/a><\/figure>\n

In last Wednesday\u2019s Autumn Statement, the UK\u2019s Chancellor George Osborne has clung, all white knuckles, to austerity<\/a> with a commitment that would make Calvin proud. But as Osborne tries to sell painful belt-tightening to the British people, across Whitehall the Ministry of Defence is making at least one large spend which seems hard to justify\u2014the new Queen Elizabeth class carriers.<\/p>\n

Britain\u2019s Carrier Strike capability (the carriers, and the planes to operate from them) will be expensive. The estimate released before April\u2019s decision to revert to the Short Take-Off Vertical Landing version of the Joint Strike Fighter was at least<\/a> \u00a36.2 billion (AUD$9.5 billion). At more than 65,000 tonnes\u2014almost three times the displacement of the Illustrious class they\u2019ll replace and the largest ships the Royal Navy has ever operated\u2014these are formidable pieces of hardware. As such, they will be symbols of national pride for a country that has naval traditions deeply embedded in its psyche. The problem is that they are unlikely to deliver a strategic benefit that justifies the price tag, no matter how impressive they look. (A fact that hasn\u2019t gone unnoticed by Britain\u2019s comedians<\/a>.)<\/p>\n

Like any element of force structure, the strategic value of the carriers rests on the situations in which they could be usefully deployed. And that\u2019s the problem\u2014it\u2019s hard to find many of those. Carrier deployment would only be the right option for the UK in situations which get a tick next to each of the following criteria:<\/p>\n