{"id":29564,"date":"2016-11-16T14:30:22","date_gmt":"2016-11-16T03:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=29564"},"modified":"2016-11-16T13:43:03","modified_gmt":"2016-11-16T02:43:03","slug":"shock-recalibrating-president-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shock-recalibrating-president-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"After the shock: recalibrating for President Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
It was hard to overstate the shock in Washington and here in New York the day after the US election. But now it\u2019s time for sober analysis of Trump\u2019s possible foreign and defence policy, and it\u2019s difficult to know where to begin. While Trump has made statements anathema to the foreign and defence policy establishment, he has offered little in the way of detailed policy. He is also known to have said privately\u2014and his advisers have assured many\u2014that his ideas are more \u2018guideposts\u2019 than blueprints<\/a>.<\/p>\n So it\u2019s unclear what his foreign and defence policy will look like. Given his business background, many issues may well be negotiable, as we are already seeing on healthcare<\/a> reform. Trump comes from the deal-making world of putting forth far-reaching ambit claims as an opening position, then moving closer to the middle. This trait could account for some of his more radical campaign pronouncements, such as some of his immigration proposals<\/a>. He could also do this as President, which would be a profound departure from the precisely-worded positions of traditional foreign policy. A compounding variable is the importance of face to this President-elect. The world will need to recalibrate how to conduct affairs of state with the US.<\/p>\n Still, some of Trump\u2019s ideas are more baked in than others, including on trade and alliances. He\u2019s long held a transactional view of alliances and believed the US pays too much for allies\u2019 security\u2014a view that resonated with his supporters (and even President Obama had complained about freeriding<\/a>). Allies will almost certainly be expected to contribute more to their own and regional security. President Trump will likely have a narrower conception of America\u2019s national interest than his predecessors.<\/p>\n While Trump has proven it possible to win an election being resolutely off piste and with a small group of advisers, it\u2019s harder to govern that way: many more people need to be drawn in to craft an agenda and run the government. The fact his candidacy was so light on detail means his appointments are even more consequential than usual. But many Republican foreign policy experts disavowed Trump in open letters earlier this year. There is, for instance, a lack of senior Asia hands among the current Trump cohort who could give the region a steady policy focus without distraction from domestic, Middle Eastern and European imperatives.<\/p>\n A few may now step forward to serve, often out of a desire to keep the country on an even keel. But with a hastily-assembled team fleshing out detail on the fly and choosing between often contradictory positions, the world should prepare for policy lurches rather than steady policy roll out.<\/p>\n