{"id":29643,"date":"2016-11-22T14:30:53","date_gmt":"2016-11-22T03:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=29643"},"modified":"2016-11-22T12:42:22","modified_gmt":"2016-11-22T01:42:22","slug":"indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/","title":{"rendered":"The Indo-Pacific: talking about it doesn\u2019t make it real"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

It\u2019s easy to see why the Indo-Pacific concept is so popular in both Canberra and Washington. Managing China\u2019s rise would be much easier if East Asia and South Asia really do coalesce to form a single integrated strategic system, because in that system India and China would almost certainly be primary strategic rivals. India would therefore hopefully function as a counterweight to China, balancing and limiting its growing power, helping America to persuade or compel China to drop its challenge to the US-led regional order and restoring Pax Americana<\/em>.<\/p>\n

But just because strategic rivalry between China and India might suit us doesn\u2019t mean it\u2019s going to happen, and just talking about an Indo-Pacific strategic system doesn\u2019t make it real. We need to look more closely at whether a single Indo-Pacific system really will emerge across the Indian and Western Pacific oceans.<\/p>\n

Andrew Phillips offers some key reasons<\/a> to doubt that the Indo-Pacific can or will function as a single system, but I think there\u2019s another one that deserves attention. It concerns the choices that India and China each have to make about their future relations with one another.<\/p>\n

Why the focus on choices? Because our concept of \u2018strategic system\u2019 is something of an abstraction. A strategic system is simply the product of the aggregate of choices that each country makes about the countries it focuses on strategically. Countries don\u2019t become strategic rivals because they\u2019re part of the same system: they\u2019re part of the same system because they choose to be strategic rivals. There will be an Indo-Pacific strategic system if India and China choose to be primary rivals, and there won\u2019t be if they don\u2019t.<\/p>\n

Sometimes those choices are forced on countries by geography, but not always. Japan and China can hardly avoid primary engagement with one another strategically. But geography doesn\u2019t compel India and China to engage strategically the same way. They have a wider range of choices.<\/p>\n

That might seem surprising, because India and China share a long and contested land border. But it\u2019s perhaps the most militarily impermeable land border in the world. It\u2019s impossible for either country to project land forces over the Himalayas on the scale that would be needed to have any strategic impact on the other. It stands as a barrier between them, not unlike a major ocean. As a result, India and China relate to one another strategically mostly as maritime powers\u2014as the expression \u2018Indo-Pacific\u2019 tacitly implies.<\/p>\n

That means they do have choices about how directly they challenge one another\u2019s core strategic interests. Of course two such powerful states are going to be rivals to some degree and on some issues. But their rivalry won\u2019t create a single Indo-Pacific strategic system\u2014and help us manage China\u2019s rise\u2014unless it engages their core strategic interests.<\/p>\n

My hunch is that they won\u2019t contest one another\u2019s core interests, become primary strategic rivals and create an Indo-Pacific strategic system unless one or both seek to contest the other\u2019s primary position in their respective ocean approaches. In other words, India would have to seek a major strategic position in the Western Pacific, or China would have to do so in the Indian Ocean, or both.<\/p>\n

I think it\u2019s quite unlikely that either will seek to do that. First, because each would find it very hard to project and sustain strategically significant maritime power into waters dominated by the land-based sea-denial capabilities of the other. They\u2019d each face the kind of A2AD challenges that America faces today in the Western Pacific.<\/p>\n

And second, because it\u2019s not clear why they would want to try in the first place. Neither side needs to dominate the other\u2019s sea-space into order to achieve their key objectives. Each will recognise the other as a formidable adversary. Why would either take on such a country as a primary rival if they don\u2019t have to?<\/p>\n

Some will argue that China at least has no choice but to become a major meantime power in the Indian Ocean to protect its sea lines of communication there. I don\u2019t see the vulnerability. Since the Napoleonic Wars, no major power has sought to interdict the trade of another major power except in a World War. That\u2019s globalisation and interdependence at work. China\u2019s sea-borne trade, like everyone else\u2019s, is protected by the mutual dependence that we all have on trade. It doesn\u2019t need to challenge India in the Indian Ocean to defend it.<\/p>\n

Of course it\u2019s possible that one or both countries might mistakenly launch a costly strategic contest that they could and should avoid. But we can\u2019t bet on that. It\u2019s more likely that they\u2019ll tacitly agree to stay out of one another\u2019s regions. In that case, and judging, as I do, that the US-led order in Asia doesn\u2019t endure, we\u2019re likely to see separate Indian Ocean and Western Pacific strategic systems dominated by India and China, and separated by the line running from Myanmar through Malaysia and Indonesia down to Australia.<\/p>\n

If that happens, Australia will be in an interesting position on the boundary between the spheres of influence of two great powers. That will offer up both risks and opportunities. Our policymakers and analysts should spend their time better exploring those risks and opportunities and what we can do about them, rather than assuming that India will allow itself to be played as a card in America\u2019s contest with China.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It\u2019s easy to see why the Indo-Pacific concept is so popular in both Canberra and Washington. Managing China\u2019s rise would be much easier if East Asia and South Asia really do coalesce to form a …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":29644,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[143,17,56,142,549],"class_list":["post-29643","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-asia-pacific","tag-australia","tag-indo-pacific","tag-regional-security","tag-strategic-policy"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe Indo-Pacific: talking about it doesn\u2019t make it real | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Indo-Pacific: talking about it doesn\u2019t make it real | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"It\u2019s easy to see why the Indo-Pacific concept is so popular in both Canberra and Washington. Managing China\u2019s rise would be much easier if East Asia and South Asia really do coalesce to form a ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-11-22T03:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-22T01:42:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/2366663964_349eb757ee_z.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"428\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hugh White\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hugh White\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/2366663964_349eb757ee_z.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/2366663964_349eb757ee_z.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":428},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/\",\"name\":\"The Indo-Pacific: talking about it doesn\u2019t make it real | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-22T03:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-22T01:42:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/16c5d4163e19210aec96b521303f308a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Indo-Pacific: talking about it doesn\u2019t make it real\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/16c5d4163e19210aec96b521303f308a\",\"name\":\"Hugh White\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d50fc19efe542c3d09a829c31ee300a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d50fc19efe542c3d09a829c31ee300a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hugh White\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/hugh-white\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Indo-Pacific: talking about it doesn\u2019t make it real | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Indo-Pacific: talking about it doesn\u2019t make it real | The Strategist","og_description":"It\u2019s easy to see why the Indo-Pacific concept is so popular in both Canberra and Washington. Managing China\u2019s rise would be much easier if East Asia and South Asia really do coalesce to form a ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2016-11-22T03:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-22T01:42:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":428,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/2366663964_349eb757ee_z.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Hugh White","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hugh White","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/2366663964_349eb757ee_z.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/2366663964_349eb757ee_z.jpg","width":640,"height":428},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/","name":"The Indo-Pacific: talking about it doesn\u2019t make it real | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2016-11-22T03:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-22T01:42:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/16c5d4163e19210aec96b521303f308a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/indo-pacific-talking-doesnt-make-real\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Indo-Pacific: talking about it doesn\u2019t make it real"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/16c5d4163e19210aec96b521303f308a","name":"Hugh White","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d50fc19efe542c3d09a829c31ee300a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d50fc19efe542c3d09a829c31ee300a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hugh White"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/hugh-white\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29643"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29643"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29643\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29646,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29643\/revisions\/29646"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29644"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}