{"id":30323,"date":"2017-01-30T06:00:32","date_gmt":"2017-01-29T19:00:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=30323"},"modified":"2017-01-27T15:52:04","modified_gmt":"2017-01-27T04:52:04","slug":"oz-policy-essential-friend-feeling-not-great-powerful","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/oz-policy-essential-friend-feeling-not-great-powerful\/","title":{"rendered":"Oz policy for an essential friend feeling not so great and powerful"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Image<\/p>\n

Australia is writing a Foreign Policy White Paper\u2014 a \u2018philosophical framework<\/a> to guide Australia\u2019s engagement, regardless of international events\u2019\u2014then along comes Donald Trump.<\/p>\n

An important bit of policy thinking has run into the unthinkable\u2014as in, what does he think? And what Trump thinks becomes starker by the moment.<\/p>\n

The third ever Oz Foreign White Paper<\/a> is to be born in the first year of the Trump presidency\/drama\/soap opera, to \u2018outline<\/a> Australia\u2019s most important principles and interests for engaging with the world and working with allies and partners in the decade ahead\u2019.<\/p>\n

In the spirit of international optimism and hope that\u2019s so widespread these days, we must congratulate the DFAT White Paper toilers on their great good luck.<\/p>\n

Nobody can now doubt the need for Australia to think long and hard about its international interests, and to speak plainly about priorities and principles. This is an unusually fraught time for predictions, but at least we should articulate clear aims. Come the moment, come the White Paper.<\/p>\n

Policy ideas can be given a real shake during days of shift and shock. The DFAT toilers are blessed to live in fascinating times, tasked to peer out a decade to guess where all these rockets will go and where they\u2019ll land.<\/p>\n

Trump tears at comfortable platitudes and terrorises old certainties. His presence on stage demands that Australia produce a policy document that performs as advertised. The White Paper web site lists a host of wonderful questions<\/a>. Yet nothing will sharpen this process like the questions posed by the new President.<\/p>\n

Trump simplifies the White Paper\u2019s rhetoric about the US. No nuance for Donald, none for us. We will shovel on the bilateral love and the loyalty, in order to get as close as possible. The words won\u2019t disguise the quaking uncertainty but, by gosh and by golly, they\u2019ll be lovely words. The more we fear flux, the louder will be the praise for the US\u2014especially the alliance.<\/p>\n

The expression of alliance love and commitment will be even more heartfelt than the 2016 Defence White Paper. The deeply traditional bit of the Foreign White Paper will have lots of stuff about the US as vital and indispensible to the world and Asian orders. Expect simple Trumpian language about the US as huge and important\u2014and, a small departure from Trump orthodoxy, still as great as ever.<\/p>\n

Australia wants the alliance to be Trump-proof. That\u2019s Kim Beazley\u2019s \u2018deep state\u2019<\/a> vision of the 21st Century alliance as \u2018a seamless interconnection\u2019 of Oz\u2013US military and intelligence that can \u2018endure through potentially sharp shifts in the orientation of future administrations.\u2019 The sharp shift has arrived and the stress test begins.<\/p>\n

The dissonance in the White Paper will be between the bilateral affirmation and regional visions. How to get some semblance of alignment between Australia\u2019s bilateral embrace of the US (based on tradition and history and alliance and power) and the Trump-driven need to think afresh about what faces the Indo\u2013Pacific? Luckily the politics of policy documents decrees that all propositions needn\u2019t be consistent; it\u2019s just another way to spell diplomacy.<\/p>\n

Bilaterally, Australia will step even closer to the US and hope for the best from the American system, if not from Trump. In the words of the previous DFAT secretary Peter Varghese<\/a>, the hope-for-the-best option \u2018is not as delusional as it may sound. The US has not yet lost strategic predominance and who can say for certain that it is inevitable?\u2019<\/p>\n

We aim to \u2018stay on the American bandwagon\u2019, in Tom Switzer\u2019s<\/a> phrase, \u2018but not sign onto every Trump initiative\u2019. So hope for the best in the bilateral dimension and plan for the worst when pondering Trump\u2019s regional impacts.<\/p>\n

The inauguration speech<\/a> crystallised what the worst sounds like. Trump is:<\/p>\n