{"id":31060,"date":"2017-03-27T06:00:29","date_gmt":"2017-03-26T19:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=31060"},"modified":"2017-03-27T15:52:07","modified_gmt":"2017-03-27T04:52:07","slug":"big-oz-bets-asia-part-two","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/big-oz-bets-asia-part-two\/","title":{"rendered":"Big Oz bets on Asia (part two)"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
The descriptor \u2018Asia\u2019 attempts to identify so much that it delivers sparse meaning. So making a series of big bets on Asia will help define the many tasks and pressures confronting the Foreign Policy White Paper<\/a>. The Asia bets flow from the need to Trump-proof<\/a> the alliance<\/a>. The previous column outlined Australian bets<\/a> on Japan stepping up as an independent strategic leader in Asia and on Australia seeking membership of ASEAN. Now for further bets on Indonesia and India (with China on the table next week).<\/p>\n These big punts are an Oz version of Pascal\u2019s Wager<\/a>, living to secure infinite gains (heaven) and avoid infinite losses (hell). Australia must wager that the emerging Asian order can achieve some levels of rationality, cohesion and peace\u2014and not send us to hell. Indonesia is a prime example of the uncertainties that bedevil Australia\u2019s Asia bets. Name two neighbouring states with less in common. Maybe Australia and Papua New Guinea come close. Indonesia can direct Australia\u2019s regional dreams or dominate its nightmares. Just as Papua New Guinea shapes the way Australia thinks about the South Pacific, Indonesia frames Australia\u2019s view of Southeast Asia.<\/p>\n Australia and Indonesia make a disparate pair, destined to discomfort, elevating a bit of common pragmatism to a guiding principle: we must live together though we are ever apart. The Secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Frances Adamson<\/a>, frames the Indonesia bet in the White Paper: \u2018A key question for Australian diplomacy is what influence we will have in Indonesia as it grows in stature?\u2019<\/p>\n Her answer:<\/p>\n \u2018As Indonesia reaches its potential as a top-ten or even top-five economy, with strategic weight to match, we want Indonesia to look to Australia as a reliable source of acute judgements and sensitive advice.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n In this bilateral relationship, the power meter keeps shifting Jakarta\u2019s way. The problem for Oz is a 1960s Jakarta jest that still resonates: \u2018Australia is like your appendix, you only think about it when it hurts.\u2019 In the 20th century, the relationship was defined by differences. This century, Australia must seek equality and partnership with an ever-more powerful Indonesia. Our mindset must change.<\/p>\n As on most things Oz\u2013Indonesia, the late Jamie Mackie<\/a> is a reliable source. Here\u2019s a ten-point guide<\/a> drawing on many years listening to Jamie, as well as the study he wrote (a decade old, yet as fresh as tomorrow): \u2018Australia and Indonesia: Current problems, future prospects\u2019<\/a>.<\/p>\n A central Mackie thought:<\/p>\n \u2018We should endeavour to ensure at all costs that our broader regional and global policies diverge from Indonesia\u2019s as little as possible\u2014and ideally should follow essentially convergent trajectories.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Continually measuring Australia\u2019s choices against Indonesian regional policy is a distinctly new way to steer Canberra\u2019s mindset, and will constitute one of our big bets. Such an alignment will feed into the slow shift that would see Australia and New Zealand eventually join ASEAN<\/a>.<\/p>\n Echoes of what Australia needs with Indonesia are to be found in the completely different relationship with India. There\u2019s certainly some overlap, for instance with organisations like the\u00a0Indian Ocean Rim Association – \u00a0Malcolm Turnbull attended it’s first summit<\/a>\u00a0in Jakarta earlier this month.<\/p>\n