{"id":31347,"date":"2017-04-18T06:00:38","date_gmt":"2017-04-17T20:00:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=31347"},"modified":"2017-04-13T12:50:30","modified_gmt":"2017-04-13T02:50:30","slug":"us-alliance-heavyweight-bout-malcolm-fraser-versus-bruce-grant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-alliance-heavyweight-bout-malcolm-fraser-versus-bruce-grant\/","title":{"rendered":"US alliance heavyweight bout: Malcolm Fraser versus Bruce Grant"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
How does an independent Australia make its way in Asia? And can Australia have an Asian future while holding tight to the alliance with its great and powerful friend?<\/p>\n
The \u2018great and powerful\u2019 reference speaks the truth that the alliance questions once directed at Britain recur in the relationship with the US.<\/p>\n
The aches and arguments about identity, interest and geography have pushed and pulled at Oz since it became a nation in 1901. My understanding of the emotions of the aches and the intensity of the argument owes much to the journalist and public intellectual Bruce Grant (nine of his books are on my shelves).<\/p>\n
At the age of 92, Grant has distilled a life devoted to thinking about Australia\u2019s world in a memoir, \u2018Subtle Moments: Scenes on a Life\u2019s Journey.\u2019<\/a> My review of the book for Inside Story<\/a> describes it as a coming of age story about a man and his country.<\/p>\n One Grant story that didn\u2019t get into the review makes a perfect yarn for The Strategist. It\u2019s his account of a heavyweight bout with the former Prime Minister, Malcolm Fraser, about whether Australia can have a future in Asia while maintaining the US alliance. Grant answered \u2018Yes\u2019 while Fraser answered \u2018No\u2019.<\/p>\n Start with a form guide for the two champs.<\/p>\n Malcolm Fraser\u2019s final geopolitical gift to Oz before his death was his 2014 book \u2018Dangerous Allies\u2019<\/a>, which made him the first Oz PM to argue for armed neutrality, not alliance.<\/a> Fraser wasn\u2019t isolationist; he wanted Australia to have a full Asian future. But to have that future, he wrote, would mean escaping our cage as a \u2018strategic captive\u2019 of the US. He advocated the end of the US alliance and closure of Pine Gap<\/a>, seeing America and Japan as more of a threat to Australia than China.<\/p>\n The man who ranks behind only Menzies and Howard in his tenure as a Liberal PM had produced a radical iconoclast\u2019s lament, a provoking and passionate attack on the orthodoxies of Australian strategy. For the first time in our history as a nation, Australia had a Prime Minister\u00a0(granted, an ex-PM) arguing\u00a0for an end to our addiction to great and powerful protectors.<\/p>\n