{"id":31754,"date":"2017-05-10T14:30:39","date_gmt":"2017-05-10T04:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=31754"},"modified":"2017-05-09T14:00:35","modified_gmt":"2017-05-09T04:00:35","slug":"putins-russian-roulette-afghanistan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putins-russian-roulette-afghanistan\/","title":{"rendered":"Putin\u2019s Russian roulette in Afghanistan"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
The recent Taliban attack on an Afghan army post<\/a> outside Mazar-i-Sharif in northern Afghanistan\u2014the deadliest-ever by the Taliban on a military base, killing some 150 recruits\u2014underscores the terrorist group\u2019s growing strength more than 15 years after they were ousted from power. The attack confirms yet again that Afghanistan still has a major security problem, and it\u2019s not about to be resolved.<\/p>\n There are still some 13,500 NATO troops which are part of the Resolute Support Mission<\/a> which mentors and trains the Afghan security forces. An additional 1,500 US troops are involved in counterterrorism operations, hunting down al-Qaeda and Islamic State terrorists.<\/p>\n However, even with these troops still in place and the US having spent some $1\u00a0trillion in war and reconstruction since 2001, the Taliban controls more territory today than it has since being ousted from power in 2001. According to US Central Command<\/a>, the Afghan government controls less than 60% of the territory, the Taliban about 10% and the remainder is contested.<\/p>\n Unfortunately, the situation could get worse.<\/p>\n General John Nicholson, the top US Commander in Afghanistan, stated<\/a> at a recent Congressional hearing that the Russians were providing military support to the Taliban. Russia has vehemently refuted<\/a> those accusations, insisting that Moscow\u2019s interaction with the Taliban is limited to convincing them to join negotiations. The Taliban has also rejected<\/a> those claims but no one believes them.<\/p>\n Notwithstanding those denials, Moscow has nevertheless been engaging the group<\/a>, believing that a strong relationship with the Taliban is essential for maintaining political stability in Afghanistan. In December 2015 President Putin\u2019s special representative to Afghanistan, Zamir Kabulov, acknowledged<\/a> that \u2018Taliban interests objectively coincide with ours\u2019.<\/p>\n Russian authorities claim<\/a> that the Taliban is the only bulwark against the greater threat, the Islamic State in Khorasan, as IS is known in Afghanistan and Pakistan (ISIS-K). However, there\u2019s no evidence to support the claim that ISIS-K is a credible threat. Compared to the Taliban, which number in the thousands or tens of thousands<\/a>, ISIS-K remains an insignificant force. Even at its height in 2015, ISIS-K was estimated to only have about 600 to 800 fighters<\/a>. The Islamic State will have been further weakened with the recent announcement<\/a> by US forces in Afghanistan that its leader, Abdul Hasib, had been killed by Afghan and US forces in late April.<\/p>\n Russia potentially arming the Taliban further complicates an already intractable situation and, as General Nicholson stated<\/a> recently, \u2018is not the best way forward for a peaceful reconciliation\u2019 in Afghanistan. But that will hardly deter President Putin from deepening Russia\u2019s relationship with the Taliban if he decides it\u2019s in Russia\u2019s interests.<\/p>\n President Trump has asked National Security Advisor H. R. McMaster to review US strategy in Afghanistan. General Nicholson has recommended<\/a> that the US military commitment in Afghanistan be increased by some 3,000 troops. While the Trump administration hasn\u2019t indicated whether it will support such a recommendation, a majority of those residing in the Pentagon\u2019s upper echelons support an increase in troop levels. The review should be finalised soon.<\/p>\n Kabul\u2019s neighbours will have mixed feelings about Russia\u2019s deepening involvement in Afghanistan. Iran, which has also been accused of arming<\/a> and providing battlefield advice to the Taliban, will welcome Russia. In a continuation of their anti-Western strategic alliance in Syria, Moscow and Tehran have been working together to accelerate the US withdrawal <\/a>from Afghanistan.<\/p>\n On the other hand, China won\u2019t be pleased. Moscow\u2019s increased meddling complicates Beijing\u2019s drive to increase its presence in Central Asia, including in Afghanistan, especially through its multi-faceted \u2018One Belt, One Road\u2019 project. Moreover, the Taliban has links with the Uighur-dominated East Turkestan Islamic Movement which regularly attacks Chinese authorities in western China. But Moscow isn\u2019t about to cede that strategic space\u2014Russia\u2019s backyard since the 19th century\u2014to China.<\/p>\n India, which traditionally supports Afghanistan\u2019s non-Pushtun ethnic groups, also won\u2019t welcome Russia\u2019s increased activity in Afghanistan, particularly its support for the Pushtun-dominated Taliban. But what should really worry the Indians is Moscow\u2019s increasing cosiness with Islamabad<\/a>, particularly in the military sphere, and what that will mean for the future of India\u2019s long-standing bilateral relationship with Russia.<\/p>\n