{"id":320,"date":"2012-07-24T14:49:43","date_gmt":"2012-07-24T04:49:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=320"},"modified":"2012-07-26T13:52:15","modified_gmt":"2012-07-26T03:52:15","slug":"reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/","title":{"rendered":"Reader response: risk, threat and insurance"},"content":{"rendered":"

Paul Monk raises<\/a> an important issue about that slippery word \u2018threat\u2019 and its place in defence policy. I don\u2019t think he quite gets it right, but nor do I agree completely with Rod Lyon\u2019s objections<\/a>. It is an important debate, because it goes right to the foundations of what defence policy is about: if we can\u2019t get this clear, we have little hope of getting the policy itself right. So by way of saying \u2018welcome\u2019 to The Strategist<\/em>, here is my take:<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s start with Paul\u2019s basic point, which I think is right. Defence policymakers often assume that the only place to begin is with a threat, to which defence capability then provides a response. That leads to muddle and embarrassment, because often there isn\u2019t a clear threat to respond to, so they find themselves either conjuring one from the air, or deciding we don\u2019t need armed forces after all. In Paul\u2019s nice phrase, \u2018hyperbole at one extreme and lazy skepticism at the other\u2019.<\/p>\n

The problem of course is that we do not just build forces to deal with evident current threats. We also, and more often, build them to deal with possible future ones. How do we capture that idea of possible future threats? Paul\u2019s solution is to invoke the idea of defence capability as insurance against threats, rather than a direct response to them. It\u2019s a step in the right direction, because it goes a little way towards capturing the idea of future threats that are not yet evident.<\/p>\n

But as Rod points out, it doesn\u2019t really solve our problem in identifying threats\u2014just pushes the problem into the future. My way of approaching this problem is a little different. This is going to seem a little semantic, but bear with me. It hinges on the distinction between \u2018risk\u2019 and \u2018threat\u2019. We often use these words as synonyms, but their meanings are in fact quite different. Look them up in the Little Oxford Dictionary and you will see what I mean. \u2018Risk\u2019 means \u2018chance of bad consequences\u2019 whereas \u2018threat\u2019 means \u2018indication of coming evil\u2019.<\/p>\n

You can see where this leads. I think defence policy\u2014for a country like Australia\u2014is about risks not threats. That means it is not about responding to dangers we can see today, but about preparing against the possibility that dangers might arise in future.<\/p>\n

How does this help? Well it directs our attention to the central importance of identifying risks as the foundation of defence policy. How we do this is way too big a subject for a blog post, so let me just illustrate how it can work by sketching the concept of risk gets us out of the \u2018China Threat\u2019 net that entangled the 2009 White Paper. China\u2019s growing power does not threatenAustralia, WP09 could have said, but it does increase Australia\u2019s strategic risks by overturning the US-led order which has been so central to minimizing those risks over the past 40 years.<\/p>\n

And of course risk is what insurance is really all about.<\/p>\n

Hugh White is professor of strategic studies at ANU and a visiting fellow at the Lowy Institute.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Paul Monk raises an important issue about that slippery word \u2018threat\u2019 and its place in defence policy. I don\u2019t think he quite gets it right, but nor do I agree completely with Rod Lyon\u2019s objections. …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[17,1425,21],"class_list":["post-320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-defence-white-paper-2013","tag-australia","tag-defence-white-paper-2013","tag-strategy-2"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nReader response: risk, threat and insurance | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reader response: risk, threat and insurance | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Paul Monk raises an important issue about that slippery word \u2018threat\u2019 and its place in defence policy. I don\u2019t think he quite gets it right, but nor do I agree completely with Rod Lyon\u2019s objections. ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-07-24T04:49:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-07-26T03:52:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hugh White\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hugh White\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/\",\"name\":\"Reader response: risk, threat and insurance | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-07-24T04:49:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-07-26T03:52:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/16c5d4163e19210aec96b521303f308a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reader response: risk, threat and insurance\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/16c5d4163e19210aec96b521303f308a\",\"name\":\"Hugh White\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d50fc19efe542c3d09a829c31ee300a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d50fc19efe542c3d09a829c31ee300a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hugh White\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/hugh-white\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Reader response: risk, threat and insurance | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Reader response: risk, threat and insurance | The Strategist","og_description":"Paul Monk raises an important issue about that slippery word \u2018threat\u2019 and its place in defence policy. I don\u2019t think he quite gets it right, but nor do I agree completely with Rod Lyon\u2019s objections. ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2012-07-24T04:49:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-07-26T03:52:15+00:00","author":"Hugh White","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hugh White","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/","name":"Reader response: risk, threat and insurance | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-07-24T04:49:43+00:00","dateModified":"2012-07-26T03:52:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/16c5d4163e19210aec96b521303f308a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reader-response-risk-threat-and-insurance\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Reader response: risk, threat and insurance"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/16c5d4163e19210aec96b521303f308a","name":"Hugh White","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d50fc19efe542c3d09a829c31ee300a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d50fc19efe542c3d09a829c31ee300a4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hugh White"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/hugh-white\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=320"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":337,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320\/revisions\/337"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}