{"id":32232,"date":"2017-06-03T23:41:59","date_gmt":"2017-06-03T13:41:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=32232"},"modified":"2017-06-04T23:01:06","modified_gmt":"2017-06-04T13:01:06","slug":"deal-steel-us-asia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/deal-steel-us-asia\/","title":{"rendered":"The deal and steel of the US in Asia"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

An Asia that doubted the strength and commitment of the US pivot now confronts a new White House songbook. The tune is \u2018America First\u2019. The words are, \u2018Let\u2019s make a deal!\u2019 And Asia can\u2019t yet discern if the line that rhymes with \u2018deal\u2019 is spelled \u2018steel\u2019 or \u2018steal\u2019.<\/p>\n

The US Secretary of Defense, James Mattis, is one of the straight men fronting the glitzy new show in the White House, promising steadfast American support for the security system it has built and maintained. His performance at the Shangri-La dialogue was an utterly familiar one\u2014to promise that America still loves Asia and ain\u2019t going anywhere. Sing it loud and sing it strong. Since the end of the Vietnam War, it has been among the most requested song-and-dance routines in the whole repertoire. The trouble now is that the audience is having trouble believing it.<\/p>\n

While Gaelic may have 40 words relating to seaweed<\/a>, Asia easily has as many formulations of \u2018South China Sea\u2019. Mattis belted out a rousing rendition that came straight out of the old pivot\/rebalance play-list. \u2018Artificial island construction and indisputable militarization of facilities on features in international waters undermine regional stability,\u2019 Mattis said. The US opposed countries \u2018militarizing artificial islands and enforcing excessive maritime claims unsupported by international law\u2019. The US could not and would not accept \u2018unilateral, coercive changes to the status quo\u2019.<\/p>\n

According to the good Secretary, the scope and effect of China\u2019s construction in the South China Sea differs from other claimants in key ways:<\/p>\n