{"id":32605,"date":"2017-06-28T11:00:30","date_gmt":"2017-06-28T01:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=32605"},"modified":"2017-06-27T22:58:02","modified_gmt":"2017-06-27T12:58:02","slug":"debating-rules-order-peace-asia-pacific","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/debating-rules-order-peace-asia-pacific\/","title":{"rendered":"Debating \u2018rules\u2019, \u2018order\u2019 and \u2018peace\u2019 in the Asia\u2013Pacific"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
Concepts such as \u2018rules\u2019, \u2018order\u2019 and \u2018peace\u2019 are often bandied<\/a> about<\/a> in dialogue among Asia\u2013Pacific countries, but the differing interpretations of those words have resulted in countries talking past each other, rather than to each other.<\/p>\n On the Korean peninsula, for instance, North and South Korea clearly have different ideas about peace and stability in their immediate neighbourhood. For South Korea, peace and stability on the peninsula are anchored in its alliance with the US, as well as North Korea\u2019s denuclearisation. On the contrary, North Korea argues that South Korea\u2019s strategy, including its joint military exercises with the US, is responsible for instability on the peninsula. From Pyongyang\u2019s perspective, it\u2019s necessary to have a strong nuclear deterrent and powerful conventional military forces to prevent war from breaking out. Evidently, both sides want the same end-goal but have different ideas on what \u2018peace\u2019 and \u2018stability\u2019 on the Korean peninsula mean.<\/p>\n The notion of a \u2018rules-based regional order\u2019 faces a similar challenge. During his speech at the recent Shangri-La Dialogue, US Secretary of Defense James Mattis highlighted<\/a> the US\u2019s \u2018deep and abiding commitment to reinforcing the rules-based international order\u2019. This order, according to Mattis, is constituted by \u2018equal respect for international law\u2019 and \u2018freedom of navigation and overflight\u2019, and is rooted in institutions such as the UN, ASEAN and the World Bank. Reaffirming that the prevailing rules-based order is built upon US presence in the region, the Australian<\/a> and Japanese defence ministers<\/a> added that regional countries had all reaped the benefits of the existing regional order. In response, the Chinese delegation leader, Lieutenant General He Lei, stated <\/a>that China is, in fact, \u2018a country that abides by, supports and defends international and regional rules\u2019.<\/p>\n