{"id":34607,"date":"2017-10-05T14:30:49","date_gmt":"2017-10-05T03:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=34607"},"modified":"2017-10-05T10:50:36","modified_gmt":"2017-10-04T23:50:36","slug":"apple-face-id-and-privacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/apple-face-id-and-privacy\/","title":{"rendered":"Apple, Face ID and privacy"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

I\u2019ve seen a number of crazy<\/a> media <\/a>pieces arguing that Apple\u2019s Face ID technology has privacy implications and will enable government mass surveillance.<\/p>\n

I disagree, and I think there\u2019s a more sensible way to think about Face ID, phones and privacy.<\/p>\n

Smartphones contain a great deal of personal information that is worth protecting, but because they\u2019re so portable they\u2019re often lost or stolen. Ideally, a phone would work only for its legitimate owner and no one else.<\/p>\n

Fundamentally, the problem that PINs, Touch ID and Face ID are trying to solve is whether you are the phone\u2019s owner.<\/p>\n

Teaching an inanimate object how to recognise someone is a difficult problem. So in the smartphone world we\u2019ve relied on proxies for identity:<\/p>\n