{"id":34758,"date":"2017-10-12T11:00:37","date_gmt":"2017-10-12T00:00:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=34758"},"modified":"2017-10-12T09:18:27","modified_gmt":"2017-10-11T22:18:27","slug":"a-new-front-in-asias-water-war","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/","title":{"rendered":"A new front in Asia\u2019s water war"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

China has long regarded fresh water as a strategic weapon\u2014one that the country\u2019s leaders have no compunction about wielding to advance their foreign-policy goals. After years of using its chokehold<\/a> on almost every major transnational river system in Asia to manipulate water flows themselves, China is now withholding data on upstream flows to put pressure on downstream countries, particularly India.<\/span><\/p>\n

For decades, China has been dragging its neighbours into high-stakes games of geopolitical poker over water-related issues. Thanks to <\/span>its forcible annexation of Tibet and other non-Han Chinese ethnic homelands\u2014territories that comprise some 60% of its landmass\u2014China is the world\u2019s unrivaled hydro-hegemon. It is the source of cross-border riparian flows to more countries than any other state.<\/span><\/p>\n

In recent years, China has worked hard to exploit that status to increase its leverage over its neighbours, relentlessly building upstream dams on international rivers. China is now home to more dams than the rest of the world combined, and the construction continues, leaving downstream neighbours\u2014especially the vulnerable lower Mekong basin states, Nepal, and Kazakhstan\u2014essentially at China\u2019s mercy.<\/span><\/p>\n

So far, China has refused to enter into a water-sharing treaty with a single country. It does, however, share some hydrological and meteorological <\/span>data\u2014essential to enable downstream countries to foresee and plan for floods, thereby protecting lives and reducing material losses.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Yet, this year, China decided to withhold such data from India, undermining the efficacy of India\u2019s flood early-warning systems\u2014during Asia\u2019s summer monsoon season, no less. As a result, despite below-normal monsoon rains this year in India\u2019s northeast, through which the Brahmaputra River flows after leaving Tibet and before entering Bangladesh, the region faced unprecedented flooding, with <\/span>devastating consequences<\/span><\/a>, especially in Assam state.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

China\u2019s decision to withhold crucial data is not only cruel; it also breaches the country\u2019s international obligations. China is one of just three countries that voted against the 1997 <\/span>United Nations Watercourse Convention<\/span><\/a>, which called for the regular exchange of hydrological and other data between co-basin states. But <\/span>China did enter into a five-year bilateral <\/span>accord<\/span><\/a>, which expires next year, requiring it to transfer to India hydrological and meteorological data daily from three Brahmaputra-monitoring stations in Tibet during the risky flood season, from 15 May to 15 October. A similar agreement, reached in 2015, covers the Sutlej, another flood-prone river. Both accords arose after flash floods linked <\/span>to suspected discharges from Chinese projects in Tibet repeatedly ravaged India\u2019s Arunachal and Himachal states.<\/span><\/p>\n

Unlike some other countries, which offer hydrological data to their downstream counterparts for free, China does so only for a price. (The Watercourse Convention would have required that no charges be levied, unless the data or information was \u2018not readily available\u2019\u2014a rule that may also have contributed to China\u2019s \u2018no\u2019 vote.)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

But it was a price India was willing to pay. And this year, as always, India sent the agreed amount.<\/span> Yet it received no data, with the Chinese foreign ministry <\/span>claiming<\/span><\/a> after almost four months that upstream stations were being \u2018upgraded\u2019 or \u2018renovated\u2019. That claim was spurious: China did supply data on the Brahmaputra to Bangladesh<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Three weeks earlier, the state-controlled newspaper Global Times<\/i> offered a more plausible explanation for China\u2019s failure to deliver the promised data to India: the data transfer had been intentionally halted<\/a>, owing to India\u2019s supposed infringement on Chinese territorial sovereignty in a dispute over the remote Himalayan region of Doklam. For much of the summer, that dispute took the form of a <\/span>border standoff<\/span><\/a> where Bhutan, Tibet, and the Indian state of Sikkim meet.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

But even before the dispute flared in mid-June, China was seething over India\u2019s boycott of its 14\u201315 May <\/span>summit<\/span><\/a> promoting the much-vaunted \u2018Belt and Road\u2019 initiative. The denial of data apparently began as an attempt to punish India for <\/span>condemning<\/span><\/a> China\u2019s massive cross-border infrastructure agenda as <\/span>an opaque, neocolonial enterprise. China\u2019s desire to punish India was then reinforced by the Doklam standoff.<\/span><\/p>\n

For China, it seems, international agreements stop being binding when they are no longer politically convenient. This reading is reinforced by China\u2019s violations<\/a> of its 1984 pact with the United Kingdom, under which China gained sovereignty over Hong Kong in 1997. China claims that the agreement, based on the formula \u2018one country, two systems\u2019, had lost \u2018practical significance\u2019 over the last 20 years.<\/span><\/p>\n

Were the roles reversed, a downstream China would have stridently accused an upstream India of exacerbating flood-related death and destruction by breaching its international obligations. But just as China has unilaterally and aggressively asserted its territorial and maritime claims in Asia, it is using the reengineering of cross-border riparian flows and denial of hydrological data to deepen its regional power.<\/span><\/p>\n

In fact, China\u2019s cutoff of water data, despite the likely impact on vulnerable civilian communities, sets a dangerous precedent of indifference to humanitarian considerations. It also highlights how China is fashioning unconventional tools of coercive diplomacy, whose instruments already range from informally boycotting goods from a targeted country to halting strategic exports (such as of rare-earth minerals) and suspending Chinese tourist travel.<\/span><\/p>\n

Now, by seizing control over water\u2014a resource vital to millions of lives and livelihoods\u2014China can hold another country hostage without firing a single shot. In a water-stressed Asia, taming China\u2019s hegemonic ambition is now the biggest strategic challenge.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

China has long regarded fresh water as a strategic weapon\u2014one that the country\u2019s leaders have no compunction about wielding to advance their foreign-policy goals. After years of using its chokehold on almost every major transnational …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":482,"featured_media":34760,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1841,52,2045,282],"class_list":["post-34758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-central-asia","tag-china","tag-hydro-hegemony","tag-water"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nA new front in Asia\u2019s water war | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A new front in Asia\u2019s water war | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"China has long regarded fresh water as a strategic weapon\u2014one that the country\u2019s leaders have no compunction about wielding to advance their foreign-policy goals. After years of using its chokehold on almost every major transnational ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-10-12T00:00:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-11T22:18:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/water-2693696_640.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"426\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Brahma Chellaney\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Brahma Chellaney\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/water-2693696_640.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/water-2693696_640.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":426},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/\",\"name\":\"A new front in Asia\u2019s water war | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-12T00:00:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-11T22:18:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/de93656772fd3940ede5d6ca24b86124\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A new front in Asia\u2019s water war\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/de93656772fd3940ede5d6ca24b86124\",\"name\":\"Brahma Chellaney\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fd617a464df31dc4b7d841dc248c299d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fd617a464df31dc4b7d841dc248c299d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Brahma Chellaney\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/brahma-chellaney\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A new front in Asia\u2019s water war | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A new front in Asia\u2019s water war | The Strategist","og_description":"China has long regarded fresh water as a strategic weapon\u2014one that the country\u2019s leaders have no compunction about wielding to advance their foreign-policy goals. After years of using its chokehold on almost every major transnational ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2017-10-12T00:00:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-11T22:18:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":426,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/water-2693696_640.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Brahma Chellaney","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Brahma Chellaney","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/water-2693696_640.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/water-2693696_640.jpg","width":640,"height":426},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/","name":"A new front in Asia\u2019s water war | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2017-10-12T00:00:37+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-11T22:18:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/de93656772fd3940ede5d6ca24b86124"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-front-in-asias-water-war\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A new front in Asia\u2019s water war"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/de93656772fd3940ede5d6ca24b86124","name":"Brahma Chellaney","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fd617a464df31dc4b7d841dc248c299d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fd617a464df31dc4b7d841dc248c299d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Brahma Chellaney"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/brahma-chellaney\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34758"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/482"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34758"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34758\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34768,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34758\/revisions\/34768"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34760"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34758"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34758"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34758"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}