{"id":34783,"date":"2017-10-13T06:00:02","date_gmt":"2017-10-12T19:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=34783"},"modified":"2017-10-12T16:42:16","modified_gmt":"2017-10-12T05:42:16","slug":"elections-at-the-un-australias-approach","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/elections-at-the-un-australias-approach\/","title":{"rendered":"Elections at the UN: Australia\u2019s approach"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/figure>\n

Australia is poised to be elected to the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) when the General Assembly meets on 16 October. Until recently, Australia, Spain and France were locked in a tight contest for two of the three available seats. However, in a demonstration of how hard these races can be, France announced<\/a> in July 2017 that it would postpone its candidacy to the next term (2021\u20132023). It\u2019s now almost a fait accompli that Australia and Spain will be elected by the UN membership. It\u2019s a significant role\u2014we\u2019ll have the opportunity to make a valuable contribution to the work of the pre-eminent intergovernmental body overseeing the protection and promotion of global human rights. In doing so, we can promote our own interests and build influence as a global player.<\/p>\n

Our HRC candidacy presents a timely opportunity to consider the value of serving on UN intergovernmental bodies and Australia\u2019s rationale for and approach in regularly putting itself forward as a candidate. My paper<\/a>, released today by ASPI, does just that. It also offers the following recommendations for the Australian government to strengthen Australia\u2019s engagement in UN electoral processes:<\/p>\n