{"id":36742,"date":"2018-01-15T14:30:32","date_gmt":"2018-01-15T03:30:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=36742"},"modified":"2018-01-15T13:56:48","modified_gmt":"2018-01-15T02:56:48","slug":"us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/","title":{"rendered":"The US Nuclear Posture Review: projections from a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Late last week, a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft<\/a> of the Trump administration\u2019s forthcoming Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) was leaked to the Huffington Post<\/em>. While it would be wrong to treat that draft as the final text\u2014after all, that\u2019s what pre-decisional means\u2014I\u2019d venture the following projections based on the dominant themes in the leaked copy.<\/p>\n

First, this NPR will bring to a close a period of recent history when US nuclear policy turned on a belief that Washington\u2019s own restraint would induce others to follow in the same direction. Instead, we\u2019ll see a return to US nuclear activism, driven in part by a bedrock truth: nuclear weapons are going to be around for the long term. Closely related to that, the period in which Washington flirted with the idea that nuclear weapons might soon have a sole purpose\u2014deterring others\u2019 use of nuclear weapons\u2014has also ended. US nuclear clout will increasingly be brought to bear against a wider range of strategic threats\u2014not because the threshold is being lowered, but because a greater range of threats can now cross the threshold.<\/p>\n

Second, the 2018 NPR will be powerfully shaped by a deteriorating strategic environment, just as the Obama administration\u2019s 2010 NPR was similarly shaped by an improving one. Russian, Chinese and North Korean behaviour over recent years means that the new NPR must re-emphasise the traditional roles of deterrence and assurance that US nuclear weapons usually play in global and regional relations. Moreover, great-power relations have already settled into a renewed contest in swaggering, to which the US cannot feign indifference.<\/p>\n

Third, and of direct relevance to US allies such as Australia, the NPR will mark a determined US effort to re-energise extended nuclear deterrence. The best indicator of that is the language used in the leaked copy. The term \u2018extended nuclear deterrence\u2019 never appears in Obama\u2019s NPR; instead we got \u2018extended deterrence\u2019, the second adjective having been surreptitiously smuggled away. The forthcoming NPR returns the adjective to its rightful place\u2014and makes plain that US allies seek nuclear assurance in more disquieting times. Allied capitals should expect franker discussions with Washington about improving the nuclear umbrellas in their neighbourhoods.<\/p>\n

Fourth, Trump\u2019s NPR will likely mark the return of the US navy to the extended nuclear deterrence mission. The idea of fitting a small number of Trident submarine-launched ballistic missiles with low-yield warheads, and\u2014longer term\u2014building and deploying a new sea-launched cruise missile to replace the now-retired Tomahawks, suggests a more active profile for the navy at the theatre and tactical levels. That change will be felt, and welcomed, most strongly in the Asia\u2013Pacific, for the simple reason that the maritime domain constitutes a larger portion of the strategic environment there than it does in Europe or the Middle East.<\/p>\n

Fifth, the NPR will lend greater import to efforts to build bipartisanship within the US in relation to its nuclear modernisation program. The leaked draft paints that as a \u2018just in time\u2019 project and the final NPR will likely retain that sense of urgency in its language. But the US mainstream seems unable to agree even on the basic shape of the future arsenal\u2014including the need to retain a triad. A lot of work remains to be done here, whatever the NPR might say.<\/p>\n

Sixth\u2014as Jon Wolfsthal, the former special assistant to Obama for arms control and non-proliferation, observed on Twitter a week ago\u2014it\u2019s hard to find President Trump\u2019s personal imprint on the pre-decisional draft. Rather, the text reflects views typically found in the Pentagon, US Strategic Command, and the nuclear weapons laboratories. If that holds true for the final document, some will conclude that the nuclear bureaucracy has simply out-manoeuvered the inexperienced new Trump administration. But it\u2019s also possible that this administration\u2019s giving the views of people like Keith Payne<\/a> and Elbridge Colby<\/a> a more sympathetic hearing than they would have had in yesteryear\u2014and that policy itself has shifted, not simply the relative balance of influence within the administration.<\/p>\n

Hopefully, many of those issues will be the subject of greater public debate once the NPR proper hits the streets. But early discussion of the pre-decisional draft has been sideswiped by an old canard: that it\u2019s dangerous to make nuclear weapons \u2018more usable\u2019<\/a>, because doing so increases the chances of nuclear war. Critics of the leaked text have taken exception to a proposal to build more flexible, low-yield nuclear weapons, believing that such forces are more likely to be used in crises. I don\u2019t think that\u2019s right. Greater usability doesn\u2019t equate to greater likelihood of use. Decisions to resort to nuclear force\u2014even in the form of limited strikes\u2014aren\u2019t generated by the shape of one\u2019s arsenal; they arise from deliberate choice.<\/p>\n

Why do more options for limited strikes matter? Because if deterrence fails, we want it to fail in small packages. Doing so maximises the prospects for war termination and negotiated settlements. Moreover, the attractiveness of failure in small packages actually goes up in a multipolar environment, because of the need to deter on multiple fronts.<\/p>\n

The forthcoming NPR is going to be important, for allies as well as the US. We should expect to see some signals that the US is reprioritising its nuclear arsenal and adjusting its doctrine and capabilities to meet the challenges of 2018.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Late last week, a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft of the Trump administration\u2019s forthcoming Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) was leaked to the Huffington Post. While it would be wrong to treat that draft as the final text\u2014after all, …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":36744,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[547,116,935],"class_list":["post-36742","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-low-yield-nuclear-weapons","tag-nuclear-deterrence","tag-nuclear-policy"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe US Nuclear Posture Review: projections from a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The US Nuclear Posture Review: projections from a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Late last week, a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft of the Trump administration\u2019s forthcoming Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) was leaked to the Huffington Post. While it would be wrong to treat that draft as the final text\u2014after all, ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-01-15T03:30:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-15T02:56:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/634px-Peacekeeper-missile-testing.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"634\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"480\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Rod Lyon\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Rod Lyon\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/634px-Peacekeeper-missile-testing.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/634px-Peacekeeper-missile-testing.jpg\",\"width\":634,\"height\":480},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/\",\"name\":\"The US Nuclear Posture Review: projections from a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-01-15T03:30:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-15T02:56:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9b94d45f61c61c15e3313f55e2c145bd\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The US Nuclear Posture Review: projections from a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9b94d45f61c61c15e3313f55e2c145bd\",\"name\":\"Rod Lyon\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9090df27d0a103459ebfc0282858e8c1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9090df27d0a103459ebfc0282858e8c1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Rod Lyon\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/rod-lyon\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The US Nuclear Posture Review: projections from a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The US Nuclear Posture Review: projections from a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft | The Strategist","og_description":"Late last week, a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft of the Trump administration\u2019s forthcoming Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) was leaked to the Huffington Post. While it would be wrong to treat that draft as the final text\u2014after all, ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2018-01-15T03:30:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-15T02:56:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":634,"height":480,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/634px-Peacekeeper-missile-testing.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Rod Lyon","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Rod Lyon","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/634px-Peacekeeper-missile-testing.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/634px-Peacekeeper-missile-testing.jpg","width":634,"height":480},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/","name":"The US Nuclear Posture Review: projections from a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2018-01-15T03:30:32+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-15T02:56:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9b94d45f61c61c15e3313f55e2c145bd"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-nuclear-posture-review-projections-pre-decisional-draft\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The US Nuclear Posture Review: projections from a \u2018pre-decisional\u2019 draft"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9b94d45f61c61c15e3313f55e2c145bd","name":"Rod Lyon","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9090df27d0a103459ebfc0282858e8c1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9090df27d0a103459ebfc0282858e8c1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Rod Lyon"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/rod-lyon\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36742"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36742"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36742\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36746,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36742\/revisions\/36746"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36744"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36742"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36742"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36742"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}