{"id":38101,"date":"2018-03-24T06:00:17","date_gmt":"2018-03-23T19:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=38101"},"modified":"2020-01-21T15:17:55","modified_gmt":"2020-01-21T04:17:55","slug":"china-responsible-stakeholder-optimism-laced-frustration-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/china-responsible-stakeholder-optimism-laced-frustration-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"China as a responsible stakeholder: optimism laced with frustration (part 1)"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Dealing with China since its accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001 has been a case of dewy-eyed optimism laced with frustration. The US reaction to this is starting to be clear under President Donald Trump, but what about the rest of us?<\/p>\n

The key idea driving trade diplomacy with Beijing from 2001 to now has been former US Secretary of State Bob Zoellick\u2019s responsible stakeholder concept. The two big ideas under this concept are:<\/p>\n