Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security<\/a>.<\/p>\nThis key committee cannot be allowed to become politicised as has its equivalent in the US. The members of the joint committee have, through many difficult investigations, earned a reputation as the informed and trusted representatives of the Australian-on-the-street when it comes to intelligence and security matters. The committee must maintain that standard.<\/p>\n
Any system of parliamentary oversight is going to have its occasional strains, but this friction is likely to be compounded when the need for secrecy is at odds with core Australian values. Thus, it\u2019s imperative that the MPs on the Joint Committee do not seek to gain political advantage by abandoning proper procedures or engaging in bipartisanship tomfoolery as has happened in the US.<\/p>\n
To assist in both the oversight and the management of Australia\u2019s restructured intelligence community, the joint committee should encourage Parliament to empower the director general in two specific areas that were not well-defined in the 2017 Independent Intelligence Review. The first is budget authority. As our colleagues in the US discovered when their Office of National Intelligence was formed after the 9\/11 attacks, its ability to coordinate the activities of the US national intelligence community was, initially, more vision than reality.<\/p>\n
At its inception, the Office of National Intelligence had little to no authority to get the US intelligence community to do anything that was not specifically directed in legislation or presidential order. Even then, some agencies just ignored the directives. Eventually, through Congressional legislation, plus the dogged determination and personal rectitude of the past two directors\u2014Jim Clapper and Mike McConnell\u2014the US Director of Intelligence was eventually given budget authority.<\/p>\n
That, more than any other authority, is what enables the Director of Intelligence to loosely manage this federation of the willing. The Office of National Intelligence is still a work in progress, but its success so far was achieved because the Director of Intelligence could manage intelligence community resources, rather than its 17 members having a shared vision!<\/p>\n
Giving Australia\u2019s director-general budget authority doesn\u2019t mean he dictates the day-to-day business of intelligence community operations. That\u2019s the job of the agency leaders. However, the director-general, working with the joint committee, will be the focal point for the planning, programming and budgeting of Australian resources to conduct security activities\u2014operational support, analysis, research and development, or intelligence architecture improvements.<\/p>\n
In this way, the oversight of intelligence activities will be even more accountable to Australian taxpayers. This will also help avoid duplication of effort and ensure that funding is targeted to national intelligence objectives based on the national strategy.<\/p>\n
A second major measure to enhance oversight and cooperation would be the establishment of a National Requirements Management Office under the director-general\u2019s leadership. The 2017 review recommended that the Office of National Assessments be expanded to support the director-general. I believe these additional resources should be used to validate and synchronise the nation\u2019s intelligence requirements, which in turn would be the basis for developing strategies to fill gaps in Australia\u2019s strategic knowledge.<\/p>\n
Such an office would foster greater collaboration and integration within the community, and provide the director-general and the joint committee a fuller appreciation of strategic requirements weighted against intelligence community capabilities. It would also link Australia\u2019s collection agencies with the all-source assessment agencies, not just in Australia, but with our Five Eye and regional partners too.<\/p>\n
The global community is fraying and Australia\u2019s institutions are under a tenacious siege from within and afar. Fortunately, the establishment of the Director-General for National Intelligence\u2019s office, overseen by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security, means there\u2019s connective tissue between the Australian people and those charged with safeguarding their freedoms.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
There are crucial lessons for Australia in the way Republican and Democrat members of the US congressional committee that oversees the intelligence agencies have played politics with the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016\u00a0presidential …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":771,"featured_media":38173,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[343,495],"class_list":["post-38172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australian-intelligence-community","tag-oversight"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
The US Russia investigation memos\u2014lessons for Australia | The Strategist<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n