{"id":38290,"date":"2018-04-04T13:12:26","date_gmt":"2018-04-04T03:12:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=38290"},"modified":"2018-04-04T13:20:07","modified_gmt":"2018-04-04T03:20:07","slug":"finding-men-ae1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/finding-men-ae1\/","title":{"rendered":"Finding the men of AE1"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

On 20 December 2017 shortly after 10\u00a0am, the coral encrusted bow and forward hydroplanes of AE1<\/em> appeared on the display, relaying images from a video camera suspended from the search vessel\u00a0Fugro Equator<\/a><\/em>, hovering more than 300\u00a0metres above. The resting place of the 35\u00a0British, Australian and New Zealand crewmembers had been found, 103\u00a0years after the loss of the Royal Australian Navy submarine.<\/p>\n

My earlier article, \u2018What happened to HMAS AE1<\/em>?<\/a>\u2019, set out the background to the acquisition of Australia\u2019s first submarines, HMAS AE1<\/em> and AE2<\/em>, including the circumstances leading up to AE1<\/em>\u2019s loss.<\/p>\n

A multi-beam echo sounder search off the Duke of York Islands in November 2015 had cleared the inshore waters down to 200\u00a0metres with a very high level of confidence that if AE1<\/em> had been there, it would have been found. The absence of the wreck weighed heavily against our preferred scenario for the loss: if the submarine had been lost following a grounding on the fringing reefs, then we would have expected to find her nearby.<\/p>\n

We returned to the original research material with a critical eye and presented our findings to a workshop held at the Australian National Maritime Museum<\/a> (ANMM) in December 2016. The workshop strengthened our conviction and focus on the few \u2018facts\u2019 in what was otherwise a series of negative clues.<\/p>\n