{"id":40501,"date":"2018-07-10T06:00:30","date_gmt":"2018-07-09T20:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=40501"},"modified":"2018-07-09T17:56:50","modified_gmt":"2018-07-09T07:56:50","slug":"national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/","title":{"rendered":"National security: the public debate and the end of ‘just trust us’"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Last week, Australian Signals Directorate Director-General Mike Burgess gave an on-the-record speech<\/a> to ASPI\u2019s artificial intelligence and national security masterclass. Following his speech, he took some tough questions from the media <\/a>and the audience.<\/p>\n

Public speeches by Australian security and intelligence chiefs are rare. Too rare. The website of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service, for example, very appropriately uses the singular \u2018speech<\/a>\u2019 to capture the one time, six years ago, when a former director-general spoke to the Australian public.<\/p>\n

A lot has changed since 2012 when we last heard from a director-general of ASIS. We are living in a time of global uncertainty where the rules-based international order isn\u2019t what it once was. Our most important security alliances and economic relationships face fresh, often unexpected, challenges and pressures<\/a>, many of which we aren\u2019t well prepared for<\/a>. And technology and cyberspace<\/a> have helped create new threats<\/a>, while also breathing life<\/a> into old threats<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Has there ever been a more important time for this rarity to end?<\/p>\n

This limited public engagement is more than just a neglect of\u2014or indifference to\u2014public communications. It has actually created problems for Australia at a time when our place in the world is under strain. It means, for example, that people are understandably sceptical when \u2018national security concerns\u2019 are cited to explain the latest international stance or policy position.<\/p>\n

What does \u2018national security concerns\u2019 really mean when it\u2019s said by one of our politicians or senior public servants? And does it mean the same thing every time it\u2019s used by the government?<\/p>\n

The Australian Financial Review<\/em>\u2019s Angus Grigg touched on this tension recently in \u2018Can we trust the spies on China\u2019s Huawei?<\/a>\u2019<\/u>:<\/p>\n

This refusal to divulge the details of Huawei\u2019s alleged miss-steps, beyond the umbrella term of \u2018national security concerns\u2019, has been grudgingly accepted over the past six years.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But we shouldn\u2019t have to grudgingly accept anything. If our national security agencies have evidence that is being used to underpin policy decisions\u2014and that information can be shared without revealing sources, methods and access\u2014then the government needs to work harder to get that information into the public domain (for example, by being more strategic with public messaging or releasing redacted\/unclassified versions of reports).<\/p>\n

Parts of the Australian intelligence and security community won\u2019t like taking on more of this responsibility, and it won\u2019t be easy. Ministers will have to empower senior officials to speak more freely and frequently. But ministers can\u2019t shy away from this. After all, ensuring the public are as informed as possible about national security threats is in their interests. More importantly, it\u2019s squarely within Australia\u2019s interests.<\/p>\n

Getting<\/a> more<\/a> information<\/a> out<\/a> into<\/a> the<\/a> public<\/a> domain<\/a> will<\/a> also<\/a> require<\/a> a cultural<\/a> shift<\/a> in how<\/a> Australia\u2019s<\/a> security<\/a> and<\/a> intelligence<\/a> agencies<\/a> have<\/a> traditionally<\/a> seen<\/a> their<\/a> place<\/a> within<\/a> government<\/a>. But<\/a> it\u2019s a<\/a> cultural<\/a> shift<\/a> that\u2019s<\/a> long<\/a> overdue<\/a>, and<\/a> one<\/a> that<\/a> is<\/a> already<\/a> underway<\/a> in other<\/a> countries<\/a> around<\/a> the<\/a> world<\/a> (see<\/a> every<\/a> hyperlink<\/a> in this<\/a> paragraph<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Why is this so important? Because the \u2018just trust us\u2019 line is getting tired.<\/p>\n

Having senior intelligence and security officials speak more freely and frequently will help inform, it will help build confidence and it will help foster public trust.<\/p>\n

As my colleague Tom Uren wrote recently, some stories need to actually be told<\/a>.<\/p>\n

If the Australian government expects us to get on board with national security decisions, it\u2019s going to have to be more proactive about getting out into the public domain to explain some of these issues, and the various tensions that colour them. But it\u2019s not just the Australian government that must shoulder more responsibility for better informing public discourse on foreign policy and international security issues. Australia\u2019s academics, think-tankers and journalists already play a vital role, but they, too, must become more proactive.<\/p>\n

For example, there\u2019s nothing more important to Australia\u2019s future prosperity than understanding and navigating China\u2019s rise, and Australia needs to invest in understanding its political, security and economic implications. As things stand, can we really say Australia is producing enough high-quality, relevant, timely and inquisitive research and reporting that helps us all understand this phenomenon? And understand it from a range of different perspectives?<\/p>\n

One major problem is that at a time when we need them the most<\/a>, our media outlets are retreating from reporting on the world<\/a> and retreating from getting Australian reporting to the world<\/a>. It\u2019s no secret that Australia\u2019s most talented journalists working on international, security and China-focused issues are already swamped trying to cover their expanding patches with precious few resources. In such an environment, important stories will of course be missed. Or, too often, they\u2019re \u2018covered\u2019 by republishing American reporting (which leaves us wondering: what does this mean for Australia?).<\/p>\n

On the research front, do we really have enough analysis coming out of our think tanks, universities and NGOs? Research undertaken by an assortment of specialists who bring different expertise to the tables? Specialists with a deep knowledge of the Chinese Communist Party and its structure; a proficiency in Chinese languages; and a strong understanding of China\u2019s legal system, the lessons to be learned from history, and the current reforms undergoing in the People\u2019s Liberation Army or the changing shape of China\u2019s economy.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m going to say no.<\/p>\n

Perhaps I\u2019m saying \u2018no\u2019 because I\u2019m greedy\u2014I want more. And I want more from all disciplines. Democracy and decision-making are improved by better information and more informed debate, from diverse perspectives.<\/p>\n

As \u2018just trust us\u2019 continues to hold less and less weight, we need to think carefully about, when it\u2019s eventually ousted for good, what replaces it. We do not need more poorly informed research and reporting, valueless talking points or \u2018whataboutism<\/a>\u2019. What we do need is more evidenced arguments, high-quality investigative reporting, policy-relevant research and analytical depth.<\/p>\n

If we want to navigate Australia\u2019s changing place in the world from the best position possible, we should all be working together\u2014across government, media, industry and civil society\u2014to avoid what we don\u2019t need and encourage bucketloads of what we do need. Adding a \u2018speeches<\/u>\u2019<\/strong> tab to the barren websites of our various intelligence agencies would be a good place to start.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Last week, Australian Signals Directorate Director-General Mike Burgess gave an on-the-record speech to ASPI\u2019s artificial intelligence and national security masterclass. Following his speech, he took some tough questions from the media and the audience. Public …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":691,"featured_media":40508,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[391,730,301],"class_list":["post-40501","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-cyber","tag-media","tag-national-security-2"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nNational security: the public debate and the end of 'just trust us' | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"National security: the public debate and the end of 'just trust us' | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Last week, Australian Signals Directorate Director-General Mike Burgess gave an on-the-record speech to ASPI\u2019s artificial intelligence and national security masterclass. Following his speech, he took some tough questions from the media and the audience. Public ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-09T20:00:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-09T07:56:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/ASDmikeburgess1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"722\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"454\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Danielle Cave\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Danielle Cave\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/ASDmikeburgess1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/ASDmikeburgess1.jpg\",\"width\":722,\"height\":454},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/\",\"name\":\"National security: the public debate and the end of 'just trust us' | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-09T20:00:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-09T07:56:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/1730ec525f034baa16dd911fea57775f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"National security: the public debate and the end of ‘just trust us’\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/1730ec525f034baa16dd911fea57775f\",\"name\":\"Danielle Cave\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0eb0eb0ac065aaf45b63a5b7a87b53d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0eb0eb0ac065aaf45b63a5b7a87b53d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Danielle Cave\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/danielle-cave\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"National security: the public debate and the end of 'just trust us' | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"National security: the public debate and the end of 'just trust us' | The Strategist","og_description":"Last week, Australian Signals Directorate Director-General Mike Burgess gave an on-the-record speech to ASPI\u2019s artificial intelligence and national security masterclass. Following his speech, he took some tough questions from the media and the audience. Public ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2018-07-09T20:00:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-09T07:56:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":722,"height":454,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/ASDmikeburgess1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Danielle Cave","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Danielle Cave","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/ASDmikeburgess1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/ASDmikeburgess1.jpg","width":722,"height":454},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/","name":"National security: the public debate and the end of 'just trust us' | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2018-07-09T20:00:30+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-09T07:56:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/1730ec525f034baa16dd911fea57775f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/national-security-the-public-debate-and-the-end-of-just-trust-us\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"National security: the public debate and the end of ‘just trust us’"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/1730ec525f034baa16dd911fea57775f","name":"Danielle Cave","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0eb0eb0ac065aaf45b63a5b7a87b53d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0eb0eb0ac065aaf45b63a5b7a87b53d7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Danielle Cave"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/danielle-cave\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40501"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/691"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40501"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40501\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40512,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40501\/revisions\/40512"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40508"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}