{"id":47338,"date":"2019-05-06T11:00:43","date_gmt":"2019-05-06T01:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=47338"},"modified":"2019-05-06T10:32:29","modified_gmt":"2019-05-06T00:32:29","slug":"washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/","title":{"rendered":"Washington\u2019s Pacific islands strategy shouldn\u2019t focus solely on China"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

China\u2019s influence in the Pacific creates a paradox for the formation of US policy towards Pacific island nations. If Washington focuses only on China\u2019s involvement in the Pacific, it risks alienating the islands. Yet without mention of China, many US policymakers will remain uninformed and uninterested. The challenge the US faces is to develop a Pacific islands policy aimed at checking Chinese influence, while not making that the obvious and exclusive goal.<\/p>\n

The solution is to address the needs of Pacific island states, advancing both their interests and those of the US and its allies.<\/p>\n

China\u2019s involvement in the Pacific has nudged Washington to pay closer attention. It has also created a problem for the US, reflected in House resolution 1157<\/a> (2018), with the long-winded title \u2018<\/em>Reaffirming the strong commitment of the United States to the countries and territories of the Pacific islands region\u2019<\/em>. It gives voice to the longstanding and deep link between Pacific islanders and the US, and echoes the 2018 Boe Declaration<\/a> on climate change and human security.<\/p>\n

The resolution, however, goes on to express concerns over China\u2019s increased influence in the Pacific region, the threat of expanded Chinese military involvement and the placement of acoustic sensors on the ocean bottom near Guam and Yap. Australian and New Zealand diplomats, in keeping with their countries\u2019 \u2018step-up<\/a>\u2019 and \u2018reset<\/a>\u2019 programs, worked to ensure that the resolution didn\u2019t focus exclusively China. They succeeded in having language inserted that reflected the broader regional concerns of climate change and human security.<\/p>\n

These same tensions were echoed at the recent Pacific Islands Roundtable<\/a>, hosted by Georgetown University\u2019s Center for Australian, New Zealand and Pacific Studies.<\/p>\n

The US hasn\u2019t been indifferent to the needs of Pacific island nations, but its attention has been episodic at best. Since 2017 there has been an uptick of interest. In April 2017, early in the Trump administration, Vice President Mike Pence stopped in American Samoa after his visit to Asia and Australia. Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke attended the 2018 Pacific Islands Forum leaders\u2019 meeting.<\/p>\n

Then, at the November 2018 APEC leaders\u2019 meeting in Port Moresby, the US, Japan, Australia and New Zealand agreed to collaborate on a project to provide electricity to 70% of Papua New Guinea. The US, PNG and Australia also announced that they\u2019d upgrade the naval base on Manus Island. In the same month, the US National Security Council created the role of director of Oceania and Indo-Pacific security; in years past, the Pacific had been folded into the Asia directorship.<\/p>\n

History has in some ways complicated US relations in the Pacific. Hawaii and the territories of Guam and American Samoa came under US control well before World War II, whereas the Northern Marianas Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands and Palau trace their US connections to the post-war era. Micronesia, the Marshall Islands and Palau are \u2018freely associated states\u2019 that were part of the Pacific trust territory governed by the US after World War II.<\/p>\n

Three federal departments (State, Defense and Interior) share primary responsibility for the Pacific territories and freely associated states. In addition, the lion\u2019s share of US aid in the Pacific goes to the freely associated states. Even with these deep links, the US nevertheless has trouble focusing on the Pacific islands. A former US official who covered the Asia\u2013Pacific cynically observed that, in an average work week, they got attention late on Friday afternoons.<\/p>\n

Australia and New Zealand have both taken steps to elevate Washington\u2019s consideration of the Pacific islands. Australia has a diplomat as lead on the islands at its embassy in Washington. In December 2018 New Zealand\u2019s foreign minister, Winston Peters, gave a speech<\/a> in Washington urging the US to do more in the region.<\/p>\n

The Pacific islands diplomatic community is small and not well resourced to undertake the heavy lifting required in Washington. Many of the diplomatic missions reside in New York and are jointly accredited to both the UN and Washington. Nonetheless, some representatives have had very long service. Palau\u2019s ambassador, Hersey Kyota<\/a>, for example, has been in Washington since 1997. So, while not having large outposts in the US, some of these diplomats have a deep understanding of the ways of Washington.<\/p>\n

Diplomats from nations throughout the Pacific ask that the US not see the islands as a bulwark against China, but rather as partners in addressing the needs of the people of the Pacific.<\/p>\n

As one Pacific diplomat observed, \u2018We\u2019re not just flyover states, there are people living there.\u2019<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

China\u2019s influence in the Pacific creates a paradox for the formation of US policy towards Pacific island nations. If Washington focuses only on China\u2019s involvement in the Pacific, it risks alienating the islands. Yet without …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":949,"featured_media":47343,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[52,294,2160,2070],"class_list":["post-47338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-china","tag-diplomacy","tag-pacific-islands","tag-us-foreign-policy"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nWashington\u2019s Pacific islands strategy shouldn\u2019t focus solely on China | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Washington\u2019s Pacific islands strategy shouldn\u2019t focus solely on China | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"China\u2019s influence in the Pacific creates a paradox for the formation of US policy towards Pacific island nations. If Washington focuses only on China\u2019s involvement in the Pacific, it risks alienating the islands. Yet without ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-06T01:00:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-06T00:32:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Marshall-Islands-2019-e1557101604528.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"700\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"479\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Alan Tidwell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Alan Tidwell\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Marshall-Islands-2019-e1557101604528.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Marshall-Islands-2019-e1557101604528.jpg\",\"width\":700,\"height\":479},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/\",\"name\":\"Washington\u2019s Pacific islands strategy shouldn\u2019t focus solely on China | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-06T01:00:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-06T00:32:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9502b9e1f1c83664c15a3fcd8c75a813\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Washington\u2019s Pacific islands strategy shouldn\u2019t focus solely on China\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9502b9e1f1c83664c15a3fcd8c75a813\",\"name\":\"Alan Tidwell\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8a56131b9c3a73664152bcb5ffe8f9f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8a56131b9c3a73664152bcb5ffe8f9f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Alan Tidwell\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/alan-tidwell\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Washington\u2019s Pacific islands strategy shouldn\u2019t focus solely on China | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Washington\u2019s Pacific islands strategy shouldn\u2019t focus solely on China | The Strategist","og_description":"China\u2019s influence in the Pacific creates a paradox for the formation of US policy towards Pacific island nations. If Washington focuses only on China\u2019s involvement in the Pacific, it risks alienating the islands. Yet without ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2019-05-06T01:00:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-06T00:32:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":700,"height":479,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Marshall-Islands-2019-e1557101604528.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Alan Tidwell","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Alan Tidwell","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Marshall-Islands-2019-e1557101604528.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Marshall-Islands-2019-e1557101604528.jpg","width":700,"height":479},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/","name":"Washington\u2019s Pacific islands strategy shouldn\u2019t focus solely on China | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-05-06T01:00:43+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-06T00:32:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9502b9e1f1c83664c15a3fcd8c75a813"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/washingtons-pacific-islands-strategy-shouldnt-focus-solely-on-china\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Washington\u2019s Pacific islands strategy shouldn\u2019t focus solely on China"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9502b9e1f1c83664c15a3fcd8c75a813","name":"Alan Tidwell","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8a56131b9c3a73664152bcb5ffe8f9f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8a56131b9c3a73664152bcb5ffe8f9f9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Alan Tidwell"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/alan-tidwell\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47338"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/949"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47338"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47338\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47349,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47338\/revisions\/47349"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/47343"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}