{"id":48157,"date":"2019-06-08T06:00:47","date_gmt":"2019-06-07T20:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=48157"},"modified":"2019-06-07T17:31:07","modified_gmt":"2019-06-07T07:31:07","slug":"clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"Clarity and consistency needed in Australia\u2019s China policy"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

When the People\u2019s Liberation Army Navy flotilla berthed in Sydney in front of an adoring crowd of Chinese Australians, you can be sure that the timing and look of the event had been planned in every detail.<\/p>\n

Right down to the professionally painted welcome signs, nothing is left to chance in the way the Chinese Communist Party commands the PLA Navy. The ships did not arrive off Sydney\u2019s Heads by accident and the party would clearly get the diversionary value of making China\u2019s biggest naval port call to Australia on the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre.<\/p>\n

The visit reinforces the CCP\u2019s domestic message that China is now a global military power. As the more strident of the party\u2019s English-language newspapers, the Global Times<\/em>, wrote recently<\/a>: \u2018A strong Chinese navy is the guarantee for peace and stability of the South China Sea and even the whole world.\u2019<\/p>\n

When the Australian navy make port visits, the intent is to promote goodwill: ships are open for inspection and visitors are hosted by smiling sailors. By contrast, and as the Australian<\/em> recorded, the PLA vessels were guarded by heavily armed crew looking more like special forces soldiers on an operation. The ships were off limits to all but the most trusted local backers, with the usual blackout applied to Australian media.<\/p>\n

Beijing\u2019s message to us is about projecting power, turning the spotlight away from a time when the PLA was mobilised to kill thousands of Chinese students. To quote the Global Times<\/em> again: \u2018It reminds us Chinese of the necessity and urgency to strengthen Chinese naval forces \u2026 We Chinese only need to keep calm. It is certain that China will hold more initiatives in its offshore area.\u2019<\/p>\n

That was the party\u2019s propaganda purpose behind the visit, but Australians should be asking what our objectives were in hosting it. Who in Canberra thought it was a good idea to allow the ships to arrive on the Tiananmen anniversary? One version is that an arrival date hadn\u2019t been agreed and the ships just turned up.<\/p>\n

Whatever the reality, the PLA Navy presence pressured our politicians into muting their comments about the massacre. In Honiara, Scott Morrison would not answer questions on the anniversary and said the foreign minister would express the government\u2019s views. A 47-word media release<\/a> from Marise Payne timidly noted the anniversary without saying who ordered the guns to be turned on the students.<\/p>\n

The statement expressed the gentlest of concerns about \u2018continuing constraints on freedom of association, expression and political participation in China\u2019 as though the problem here is a bit of constitutional trimming rather than the behaviour of an authoritarian dictatorship.<\/p>\n

Australia\u2019s willingness to look the other way in the face of an increasingly assertive China has been evident since Xi Jinping came to power in 2012. At one level it\u2019s understandable. During the years of China\u2019s so-called \u2018peaceful rise\u2019 it seemed possible that, while the Chinese economy grew, we could get rich without compromising our national security interests.<\/p>\n

That time has passed. Australian governments now must handle a more complicated relationship with Beijing, where our fundamental differences of national interest cannot be papered over. Our reflex instinct to tolerate Beijing\u2019s bad behaviour will damage us. If China\u2019s leaders conclude that Australia will tolerate any slight, no one should be surprised if their ill-disguised disregard of us continues.<\/p>\n

Many times, Australian governments have chosen to overlook Chinese hostile and damaging behaviour, based on public service advice that turning the other cheek will save our economy from Beijing\u2019s \u2018punishment\u2019.<\/p>\n

In the cyber realm, China is a sophisticated and persistent aggressor seeking to steal intellectual property from Australia\u2019s universities and businesses while gathering intelligence on government and political secrets.<\/p>\n

Trying to persuade Beijing to limit this wholesale cyber theft, Australia held its first (and, so far, only) \u2018Australia\u2013China High-Level Security Dialogue\u2019 in April 2017. In a joint statement<\/a>, both countries \u2018agreed not to conduct or support cyber-enabled theft of intellectual property, trade secrets or confidential business information with the intent of obtaining competitive advantage\u2019.<\/p>\n

The senior Chinese official at the meeting, Meng Jianzhu, was told how much Australian agencies knew about Chinese cyber hacking in the hope that \u2018naming and shaming\u2019 might improve behaviour.<\/p>\n

Of course, the spying has only gotten worse. China has been outed as comprehensively infiltrating the Australian National University\u2019s IT network. There have been public revelations about \u2018sophisticated state actors\u2019 using cyber means to attack the Australian parliament, the headquarters of the Liberal, Labor and National parties and, just this week, the ANU for a second time.<\/p>\n

The \u2018sophisticated state actor\u2019 is China\u2019s Ministry of State Security. The Australian government won\u2019t say that because of the fear of Beijing\u2019s punishment.<\/p>\n

A second example is China\u2019s annexation of the South China Sea and construction of three large airbases on reclaimed land. In 2016, our government, lacking confidence in the Obama administration\u2019s willingness to oppose China\u2019s illegal annexation, decided not to conduct freedom-of-navigation operations near any \u2018contested feature\u2019.<\/p>\n

Julie Bishop said<\/a> in March 2018, \u2018What we won\u2019t do is unilaterally provoke an increase in tensions\u2019 by sailing too close to the islands. Astonishingly, this reversed the onus of responsibility for destabilising the region.<\/p>\n

If the aim was to prompt an improvement in Chinese behaviour, Australia\u2019s softly, softly approach has achieved the opposite. The Global Times<\/em> editorialised<\/a> in 2015 that \u2018it would be a shame if one day a plane fell from the sky and it happened to be Australian\u2019, and only a few days ago an Australian helicopter operating in the South China Sea was \u2018lased\u2019<\/a> from a so-called Chinese fishing vessel.<\/p>\n

Lasing is a hostile act designed to damage pilots\u2019 optic nerves. The Australian Defence Force chose not to publicly reveal the incident, saying instead<\/a> that its Chinese counterparts \u2018were friendly, they were professional and said g\u2019day\u2019.<\/p>\n

So, Chinese paramilitary units on one day commit a hostile act against an Australian helicopter in international airspace and, far from objecting to such unacceptable and highly risky behaviour, Australia\u2019s response is to welcome the PLA Navy into Sydney Harbour.<\/p>\n

Only a few days after Morrison revealed that Australia\u2019s political parties had been hacked by a sophisticated state actor, our Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade announced that substantially increased funding would be provided for \u2018a new and innovative National Foundation for Australia\u2013China Relations\u2019. A breathless media release claimed that, \u2018This new initiative reflects the Australian Government\u2019s commitment to a constructive relationship with China, founded on shared interests, mutual benefit and mutual respect.\u2019<\/p>\n

\u2018Mutual respect\u2019? Is DFAT serious?<\/p>\n

But the list of slights and Australian non-responses goes on. In January, an Australian-Chinese national, Yang Hengjun, was detained without charge by Chinese state security police. Days later, a five-line Foreign Affairs statement<\/a> said that officials were \u2018seeking to clarify the nature of this detention\u2019, but that\u2019s the limit of what was said publicly. Contrast that with the loud ministerial interventions and prime ministerial photo opportunities for Hakeem al-Araibi, the Australian footballer detained by Thai authorities.<\/p>\n

And finally there\u2019s the Chinese company Huawei. Last August, the Australian government took the right decision to exclude from the 5G network<\/a> any companies \u2018who are likely to be subject to extrajudicial directions from a foreign government that conflict with Australian law\u2019.<\/p>\n

That decision, which has received bipartisan support, effectively excludes Huawei from Australia\u2019s future 5G network. Huawei\u2019s response<\/a> was to claim that the decision was \u2018politically motivated, not the result of a fact-based, transparent, or equitable decision-making process.\u2019<\/p>\n

In May, Huawei invited some Australian organisations (not ASPI) on an all-expenses-paid visit to China. Huawei\u2019s chairman, John Lord, explains: \u2018As your organisation is often called on by the media and government to comment or provide advice about the Australia\u2013China relationship, Huawei wishes to invite you or a colleague to join an Australian Think Tank study tour to refresh or broaden your understanding of our largest trading partner.\u2019<\/p>\n

The visit proposes extensive briefings with Australian diplomatic staff in Guangdong, Shanghai and Beijing. So, here we have one part of government, Foreign Affairs, supporting the efforts of Huawei to influence Australian institutions \u2018that comment or provide advice\u2019 to other parts of government about policy decisions already taken.<\/p>\n

The Morrison government must get its thinking on China into coherent shape. Silence in the face of bad behaviour from the PLA or intelligence agencies only encourages more bad behaviour. Naive attempts to curry favour by funding activities in the name of \u2018mutual benefit and mutual respect\u2019 fool no one.<\/p>\n

Having considered every other option first, ultimately our government will need to behave a bit more like China\u2014by strongly promoting our national interests, speaking plainly in defence of our core values, and explaining our strategic priorities to the Australian public.<\/p>\n

In the unlikely event that Beijing does respond by punishing an Australian government, our leaders will have the consolation of having behaved according to the values that we claim inform our foreign policy. That won\u2019t be unpopular domestically.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When the People\u2019s Liberation Army Navy flotilla berthed in Sydney in front of an adoring crowd of Chinese Australians, you can be sure that the timing and look of the event had been planned in …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":48160,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2212,1383,2138,1414],"class_list":["post-48157","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australia-china-relations","tag-ccp","tag-cybersecurity","tag-pla"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nClarity and consistency needed in Australia\u2019s China policy | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Clarity and consistency needed in Australia\u2019s China policy | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When the People\u2019s Liberation Army Navy flotilla berthed in Sydney in front of an adoring crowd of Chinese Australians, you can be sure that the timing and look of the event had been planned in ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-07T20:00:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-07T07:31:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/0706ships.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"518\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter Jennings\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter Jennings\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/0706ships.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/0706ships.jpg\",\"width\":800,\"height\":518},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/\",\"name\":\"Clarity and consistency needed in Australia\u2019s China policy | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-07T20:00:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-07T07:31:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Clarity and consistency needed in Australia\u2019s China policy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548\",\"name\":\"Peter Jennings\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Peter Jennings\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/peter-jennings\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Clarity and consistency needed in Australia\u2019s China policy | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Clarity and consistency needed in Australia\u2019s China policy | The Strategist","og_description":"When the People\u2019s Liberation Army Navy flotilla berthed in Sydney in front of an adoring crowd of Chinese Australians, you can be sure that the timing and look of the event had been planned in ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2019-06-07T20:00:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-07T07:31:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":518,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/0706ships.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Peter Jennings","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter Jennings","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/0706ships.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/0706ships.jpg","width":800,"height":518},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/","name":"Clarity and consistency needed in Australia\u2019s China policy | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-06-07T20:00:47+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-07T07:31:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/clarity-and-consistency-needed-in-australias-china-policy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Clarity and consistency needed in Australia\u2019s China policy"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548","name":"Peter Jennings","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Peter Jennings"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/peter-jennings\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48157"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48157"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48157\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48173,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48157\/revisions\/48173"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/48160"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}