{"id":48424,"date":"2019-06-19T15:15:55","date_gmt":"2019-06-19T05:15:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=48424"},"modified":"2019-06-19T16:16:21","modified_gmt":"2019-06-19T06:16:21","slug":"a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/","title":{"rendered":"A new DWP wouldn\u2019t be worth the white paper it\u2019s written on"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

On a five-year timetable<\/a>, we\u2019re due for another defence white paper (DWP) in 2021. The last one took the best part of two years to prepare, so starting one now would be about right. If the five-year timetable continues, Defence would spend fully 40% of its time in white paper mode, which would significantly eat into its ability to do other things\u2014like planning to deliver the capability initiatives from the previous one.<\/p>\n

I lean on the side of \u2018fewer but better\u2019 where major strategic policy documents are concerned, and the idea of defence white papers being produced on a five-year timetable makes little sense. For a start, they take much longer than that to play out\u2014we\u2019re only just getting around to the delivery of initiatives contained in DWP 2000<\/a>, in the form of the Hobart-class ships and the F-35.<\/p>\n

Instead, the timing for white papers should be driven by Australia\u2019s strategic circumstances and the broader strategic outlook, which don\u2019t change on nice, neat timescales. We didn\u2019t have a DWP between the first one in 1976 and the next in 1987<\/a> for the very good reason that not a lot was happening. That said, I think the changes we\u2019re seeing now, both in our immediate region and globally, mean that a new white paper actually is<\/em> needed.<\/p>\n

The assumption of continued US primacy that permeated DWP 2016 looked heroic at the time. It seems almost foolishly misplaced now.\u00a0While the Obama administration often disappointed the strategy community with its tepid responses to geopolitical challenges, those now seem like the good old days.<\/p>\n

Under the current administration, the caprice and bullishness of US foreign policy\u2014not to mention its unseemly embrace of autocrats\u2014seems as likely to precipitate a crisis as it is to resolve one. It\u2019s hard to say whether the rise of President Donald Trump is an aberration or a trend, but the past few US administrations haven\u2019t really inspired confidence in the longevity of US hegemony in any case. The obvious conclusion for America\u2019s friends and allies is that more self-sufficiency wouldn\u2019t go astray.<\/p>\n

DWP 2016 did get China right in the sense of identifying its potential to become an active revisionist. Where it probably got things wrong was in the timescale. Back then we were told that China could disrupt the strategic order sometime in the period out to 2035, which is a comfortable way off if you don\u2019t actually want to do anything quickly that entails force structure changes. But actions in the South China Sea in the past few years and the Chinese messaging at the recent Shangri-La Dialogue<\/a> suggest that we might not have that luxury. Meanwhile, our first Hunter-class frigate and Attack-class submarine will be doing their first sea trials around 2030, so it doesn\u2019t look like we have appropriate urgency.<\/p>\n

And then there\u2019s the matter of emerging technologies, some of which look like being, if not game-changing, at least game-extensively-modifying. The list includes swarming unmanned systems\u2014potentially autonomous ones\u2014\u2018artificial intelligence\u2019 (which in practice means machine-based expert decision-making), high-precision quantum sensors, and hypersonic weapon systems. Individually, any of those could be disruptive of current force structures. Collectively, they could change the face of warfare as we know it. Yet the Australian Defence Force outlined in DWP\u00a02016 would be readily recognisable to defence planners in the Menzies government.<\/p>\n

Consistent with all that is the first of two takeaway points from my talk at ASPI\u2019s \u2018War in 2025\u2019 conference last week:<\/p>\n

Australia desperately needs a new defence white paper.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Less obvious was the second point:<\/p>\n

There is no point in embarking on a new defence white paper.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In the light of everything I\u2019ve just said, you might well wonder why I don\u2019t think it\u2019s worth producing another defence white paper. The answer is that I don\u2019t believe that the system that would be asked to produce it has the courage or imagination required to significantly change direction.<\/p>\n

A DWP breaks down into four major sections: an essay about our strategic circumstances, an essay about our military strategy, an outline of a future force structure, and a budget. The first of those is the easiest to modify and the least significant in practice. Our future security won\u2019t be guaranteed by a nicely crafted assessment of China\u2019s strategic intentions. If we\u2019re serious about meeting the challenges we face, we need to take a hard look at the military strategy and especially the force structure.<\/p>\n

Neither of those is likely to happen. The sunk cost and institutional fondness for the current ADF structure, combined with the industrial landscape and its associated politics, will see to that. The mega-projects and the joint and \u2018balanced\u2019 ADF are for all practical purposes immutable. Even if the government was seized with urgency, after two years of staff effort and upward management from Defence the most likely outcome is that we would end up with the next few items on the ADF\u2019s wish list grafted onto the existing plan, with all the big-ticket items\u2014and their relaxed timescales\u2014unscathed. Plus \u00e7a change, plus c\u2019est la m\u00eame chose<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Whether we like it or not, if there was to be a war in 2025, or even 2035, it\u2019s going to be largely a \u2018come as you were before the 2016 white paper\u2019 affair for Australia. That might or might not be good enough, but I don\u2019t think DWP 2021 is likely to significantly change that.<\/p>\n

This article was adapted from a talk given at ASPI\u2019s \u2018War in 2025<\/a>\u2019 international conference on 14 June 2019.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On a five-year timetable, we\u2019re due for another defence white paper (DWP) in 2021. The last one took the best part of two years to prepare, so starting one now would be about right. If …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":48426,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[44,606,279,21],"class_list":["post-48424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australian-defence-force","tag-defence-white-paper","tag-force-structure","tag-strategy-2"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nA new DWP wouldn\u2019t be worth the white paper it\u2019s written on | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A new DWP wouldn\u2019t be worth the white paper it\u2019s written on | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On a five-year timetable, we\u2019re due for another defence white paper (DWP) in 2021. The last one took the best part of two years to prepare, so starting one now would be about right. If ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-06-19T05:15:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-06-19T06:16:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/5703519506_b091a256dd_z.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"427\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Andrew Davies\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Andrew Davies\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/5703519506_b091a256dd_z.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/5703519506_b091a256dd_z.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":427,\"caption\":\"On the South Bank during the 60th anniversary of the Festival of Britain.\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/\",\"name\":\"A new DWP wouldn\u2019t be worth the white paper it\u2019s written on | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-06-19T05:15:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-06-19T06:16:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/08a9125f7af3039520d264e965235a73\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A new DWP wouldn\u2019t be worth the white paper it\u2019s written on\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/08a9125f7af3039520d264e965235a73\",\"name\":\"Andrew Davies\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bbb47ebb41d4978346dbf2e1d21b992a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bbb47ebb41d4978346dbf2e1d21b992a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Andrew Davies\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/andrew-davies\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A new DWP wouldn\u2019t be worth the white paper it\u2019s written on | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A new DWP wouldn\u2019t be worth the white paper it\u2019s written on | The Strategist","og_description":"On a five-year timetable, we\u2019re due for another defence white paper (DWP) in 2021. The last one took the best part of two years to prepare, so starting one now would be about right. If ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2019-06-19T05:15:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-06-19T06:16:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":427,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/5703519506_b091a256dd_z.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Andrew Davies","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Andrew Davies","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/5703519506_b091a256dd_z.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/5703519506_b091a256dd_z.jpg","width":640,"height":427,"caption":"On the South Bank during the 60th anniversary of the Festival of Britain."},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/","name":"A new DWP wouldn\u2019t be worth the white paper it\u2019s written on | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-06-19T05:15:55+00:00","dateModified":"2019-06-19T06:16:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/08a9125f7af3039520d264e965235a73"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/a-new-dwp-wouldnt-be-worth-the-white-paper-its-written-on\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A new DWP wouldn\u2019t be worth the white paper it\u2019s written on"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/08a9125f7af3039520d264e965235a73","name":"Andrew Davies","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bbb47ebb41d4978346dbf2e1d21b992a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bbb47ebb41d4978346dbf2e1d21b992a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Andrew Davies"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/andrew-davies\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48424"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48424"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48424\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48431,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48424\/revisions\/48431"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/48426"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}