{"id":48895,"date":"2019-07-05T11:49:28","date_gmt":"2019-07-05T01:49:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=48895"},"modified":"2019-07-05T11:49:28","modified_gmt":"2019-07-05T01:49:28","slug":"why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Why we need a rethink of Australia\u2019s citizenship revocation law"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

The logic behind Australia\u2019s terrorism-related loss-of-citizenship provisions is meant to be brilliantly simple: if a person travels overseas to be a foreign fighter, and is a dual citizen, then under certain circumstances their Australian citizenship can be rescinded.<\/p>\n

Three key arguments have been provided to defend<\/a> the measure. First, citizenship revocation punishes those who have travelled to Iraq and Syria. Second, such legislation deters Australians who might consider travelling there. Third, it helps protect Australians from the threat of terror, as it means that those who went abroad can\u2019t return to Australia to commit terrorist acts.<\/p>\n

While this exclusionary approach might resonate with some Australians, there are serious flaws in those arguments.<\/p>\n

In the first instance, the measure applies a geographically limited conceptualisation of the terror threat. At best, citizenship-loss provisions mitigate the risk of terrorism in<\/em> Australia. However, as the tragedies of the 2002 Bali bombings, the 2017 London Bridge attack<\/a> and the 2019 Barcelona attack<\/a> illustrated, terrorism threatens Australians and Australian interests (a key aspect in the legislation) beyond our shores. We must remember that Australians love to travel\u2014in 2018<\/a>, 10.5\u00a0million of us travelled overseas.<\/p>\n

The citizenship revocation measure amounts to a de\u00a0facto terrorist exiling program for foreign fighters who have dual citizenship or are entitled to another citizenship. At best, this \u2018you\u2019re banned\u2019 approach displaces rather than mitigates the threat. Arguably, many of those who lose their citizenship will simply look for a new \u2018safe haven\u2019. If, as is so often pointed out, terrorism is a global threat, then citizenship-loss provisions, on their own, do little to mitigate the global risk of terror attacks. In fact, they compound it.<\/p>\n

Banning people such as New Zealander Mark Taylor, who had lived in Australia for 25\u00a0years before heading to Syria, or teenage Islamic State \u2018bride\u2019 Zaynab Sharrouf, from returning to Australia is counterproductive. Those individuals are small players in the IS story. In contrast, their effective deradicalisation would have great strategic value in the struggle to undermine the IS narrative.<\/p>\n

Bryant Neal Vi\u00f1as<\/a>, al-Qaeda\u2019s first American foreign fighter, has campaigned against Islamic radicalism since being released from prison. He also reviewed countless pieces of information, leading US prosecutors to describe<\/a> him as the \u2018single most valuable cooperating witness\u2019 about al-Qaeda activities.<\/p>\n

The threat from someone who believes in the ideas of IS or al-Qaeda isn\u2019t mitigated by their loss of citizenship. Exiling them simply means that our security services will need to devote different resources to keep track of them wherever they may be. Alternatively, if their return to Australia can be managed, a range of security, legislative and community-based measures can be applied to mitigate the risk that they might pose.<\/p>\n

While it remains true that individual journeys to violent extremism are uniquely personal, the best methods for disengagement and deradicalisation are still being found. The evidence base and empirical data on deradicalisation continue to grow rapidly. Over the past two decades, Australian authorities have accumulated a great deal of experience in countering violent extremism and in deradicalisation. This has given rise to some promising tools, such as the Proactive Integrated Support Model, or PRISM, managed by Corrective Services NSW.<\/p>\n

Without ongoing supervision and wrap-around support services, the application of citizenship loss could result in known terrorist offenders being able to mount further attacks or engage in other nefarious activities in other countries. In many cases, those who lose their Australian citizenship could and do end up in jurisdictions with insufficient legislation, resources or will to manage them. In contrast, the ongoing management of a terrorist offender in Australia, while resource intensive, is likely to have a far more lasting impact in mitigating global terrorism risks.<\/p>\n

Whereas there\u2019s hope that terrorists incarcerated in or returning to Australia may be deradicalised, there\u2019s little prospect of deradicalising those who end up in foreign jurisdictions due to citizenship loss. At best, there\u2019ll be an opportunity for closely managed community monitoring. Arguably, terrorism-related citizenship loss may mitigate short-term risk but increase global risk in the long term.<\/p>\n

Most terrorism narratives seek to establish in the minds of their current and potential members a sense of persecution, discrimination and isolation. The terrorist group offers a person a community, a place to belong and some greater purpose.<\/p>\n

The terrorism-related citizenship-loss provisions unintentionally support those narratives. If a person\u2019s citizenship can be cancelled, then surely their citizenship is worth \u2018less\u2019 than that of someone born in Australia. These circumstances can be easily crafted into a narrative that will resonate with people who already feel that they aren\u2019t a part of Australian society. So, while the legislative provisions may mitigate the risk from one terrorist, they might also contribute to the radicalisation of many more Australians.<\/p>\n

Earlier this year, Attorney-General Christian Porter referred the operation, effectiveness and implications of the terrorism-related citizenship-loss provisions in the Australian Citizenship Act 2007<\/em> for review by the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor, Dr James Renwick.<\/p>\n

Last week, Renwick held a public hearing for his review. In our submission<\/a> to the inquiry, Isaac Kfir and I argued that the logic behind these provisions is dangerously simplistic.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The logic behind Australia\u2019s terrorism-related loss-of-citizenship provisions is meant to be brilliantly simple: if a person travels overseas to be a foreign fighter, and is a dual citizen, then under certain circumstances their Australian citizenship …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":310,"featured_media":48898,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[17,1316,273,704,127],"class_list":["post-48895","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australia","tag-citizenship","tag-counterterrorism","tag-legislation","tag-terrorism"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nWhy we need a rethink of Australia\u2019s citizenship revocation law | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why we need a rethink of Australia\u2019s citizenship revocation law | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The logic behind Australia\u2019s terrorism-related loss-of-citizenship provisions is meant to be brilliantly simple: if a person travels overseas to be a foreign fighter, and is a dual citizen, then under certain circumstances their Australian citizenship ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-05T01:49:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/0507austdepart.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"716\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"John Coyne\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"John Coyne\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/0507austdepart.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/0507austdepart.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":716},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/\",\"name\":\"Why we need a rethink of Australia\u2019s citizenship revocation law | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-05T01:49:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-05T01:49:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/a67980596297e3db4ad0b3fde70aa778\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why we need a rethink of Australia\u2019s citizenship revocation law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/a67980596297e3db4ad0b3fde70aa778\",\"name\":\"John Coyne\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e84af569f04d25615d1447d4fe1908a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e84af569f04d25615d1447d4fe1908a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"John Coyne\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/john-coyne\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why we need a rethink of Australia\u2019s citizenship revocation law | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why we need a rethink of Australia\u2019s citizenship revocation law | The Strategist","og_description":"The logic behind Australia\u2019s terrorism-related loss-of-citizenship provisions is meant to be brilliantly simple: if a person travels overseas to be a foreign fighter, and is a dual citizen, then under certain circumstances their Australian citizenship ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2019-07-05T01:49:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":716,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/0507austdepart.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"John Coyne","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"John Coyne","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/0507austdepart.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/0507austdepart.jpg","width":1000,"height":716},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/","name":"Why we need a rethink of Australia\u2019s citizenship revocation law | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-07-05T01:49:28+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-05T01:49:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/a67980596297e3db4ad0b3fde70aa778"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/why-we-need-a-rethink-of-australias-citizenship-revocation-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why we need a rethink of Australia\u2019s citizenship revocation law"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/a67980596297e3db4ad0b3fde70aa778","name":"John Coyne","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e84af569f04d25615d1447d4fe1908a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e84af569f04d25615d1447d4fe1908a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"John Coyne"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/john-coyne\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48895"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/310"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48895"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48895\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48897,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48895\/revisions\/48897"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/48898"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48895"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48895"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48895"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}