{"id":49012,"date":"2019-07-11T11:12:13","date_gmt":"2019-07-11T01:12:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=49012"},"modified":"2019-07-11T11:12:13","modified_gmt":"2019-07-11T01:12:13","slug":"keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/","title":{"rendered":"Keeping up with conflict: weapons reviews and the laws of war"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

As the Geneva Conventions turn 70, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is changing its guide to how new weapons are reviewed. Here\u2019s why we need to pay attention.<\/p>\n

After witnessing the Battle of Solferino in 1859, one of the bloodiest battles<\/a> of the 19th century, the founder of the Red Cross wrote, \u2018If the new and frightful weapons of destruction which are now at the disposal of the nations seem destined to abridge the duration of future wars, it appears likely, on the other hand, that future battles will only become more and more murderous.\u2019<\/p>\n

In his reflection, Henry Dunant was right on one count and wrong on another. In 2019, shortened conflicts are not the experience<\/a> of the ICRC. At the same time, the emergence of new weapons due to rapid technological change urgently requires a humanitarian check. That check consists of barely five lines of text, forming Article 36<\/a> in the first additional protocol to the Geneva Conventions.<\/p>\n

Article\u00a036 obliges countries that are party to the protocol to assess the legality of new weapons, methods and means of warfare during development or acquisition. It seeks to prevent or reduce suffering by setting limits on warfare, whether using traditional, cyber, space or autonomous weapons. While many countries acknowledge their shared interest<\/a> in assessing the legality of new weapons, the practical steps in conducting such reviews are less well known.<\/p>\n

This is where the ICRC plays an active role, encouraging states to learn from each other on process and practice. In the light of rapidly developing weapons technologies, and with an update to the ICRC\u2019s guide<\/a> to legal reviews on the way, it\u2019s time to revisit Article 36.<\/p>\n

This crucial article limits the use of weapons that target indiscriminately or cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering. For this reason, it\u2019s seen as a useful stopgap in ensuring compliance with the laws of war. It\u2019s bolstered by other areas of that law stressing that conducting warfare is not without its limits. In particular, Article\u00a036 obliges parties to the protocol to conduct legal reviews during the study, development, acquisition or adoption of new weapons. The review applies to weapons in the widest sense of the word, as well as to how they\u2019re used.<\/p>\n

The ICRC holds that the obligation to review is an ongoing one. Should a previously cleared weapon be modified in a way that affects its use, the review process would be triggered once more. These legal reviews seek to determine whether the weapon is already specifically prohibited by any binding treaty or by customary international law. If not, it still needs to be held up against a number of other bodies of law.<\/p>\n

If the weapon isn\u2019t covered by treaty law, the ICRC holds that it needs to be considered in the light of a rule known as the \u2018Martens Clause<\/a>\u2019, which applies \u2018principles of humanity\u2019 and the \u2018dictates of public conscience\u2019 to the weapon in question. The scope of these reviews can require a significant amount of evidence to inform them, prompting further questions.<\/p>\n

While Article\u00a036 sets the obligation, it doesn\u2019t lay down a practical path for conducting legal reviews of new weapons. This lack of detail poses challenges of legal interpretation, but also of policy. Who should be responsible for the review? Who should participate? When will legal reviews occur? How will decisions be made and records kept? These practical questions are compounded by challenges arising from the environment in which the reviews operate.<\/p>\n

Rapid technological change is the clear example that underscores Article\u00a036\u2019s importance and challenges countries to keep up with new weapon capacities. But, as weapons become more sophisticated, the process of reviewing them becomes more complex\u2014and more expensive. Finding the evidence required for reviews (technical description, performance, health and environmental effects) can be resource intensive. Fewer than 20 countries worldwide are known to conduct legal reviews of new weapons. In the Asia\u2013Pacific region, only Australia and New Zealand are on the record as doing so.<\/p>\n

But considering what all these practical challenges amount to also provides the greatest incentive for countries to work together. Legal reviews are international obligations with the onus on individual countries to comply. They may vary in format or method from country to country, but cooperation and information sharing can render them less costly in resources and more effective in outcome. The ICRC is updating its guide to legal reviews to acknowledge these hurdles and to advance the conversation in lockstep with them.<\/p>\n

The discussion should focus on both the need for legal reviews of new weapons and the practical path towards them. The global community has come<\/a> together<\/a> for such conversations<\/a> before. The role of the ICRC in this space is to facilitate information sharing and to provide support and advice on weapons reviews. Its original 2006 legal review guide proposed types of weapons to include and empirical data and legal frameworks to consider, while recommending structures and formats.<\/p>\n

In conversation with countries, the ICRC also identified a body of best practice. Reviews should start as early as possible. They should be multidisciplinary in terms of those involved, giving evidence and adjudicating. Military lawyers should receive technical training in the systems that they\u2019re examining. Examining empirical evidence and the weapon\u2019s intended use is critical.<\/p>\n

In late 2018, the ICRC invited representatives from 13 countries for a three-day seminar<\/a> in Australia dedicated to discussing Article\u00a036 and the implications of new weapons. It provided an opportunity for countries in the region to learn from each other about emerging technologies and how to fulfil their obligations according to the laws of war.<\/p>\n

The seminar was designed to get countries talking, encouraging more engagement with legal reviews and the challenges posed by new weapons. Ahead of the release of the ICRC\u2019s updated guide to legal reviews, conversations like these aren\u2019t a bad place to start.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As the Geneva Conventions turn 70, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is changing its guide to how new weapons are reviewed. Here\u2019s why we need to pay attention. After witnessing the Battle …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":983,"featured_media":49015,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[493,332,239,67],"class_list":["post-49012","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-international-law","tag-technology","tag-warfare","tag-weapons"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nKeeping up with conflict: weapons reviews and the laws of war | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Keeping up with conflict: weapons reviews and the laws of war | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"As the Geneva Conventions turn 70, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is changing its guide to how new weapons are reviewed. Here\u2019s why we need to pay attention. After witnessing the Battle ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-11T01:12:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/1107laser.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"665\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Patrick Griffiths\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Patrick Griffiths\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/1107laser.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/1107laser.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":665,\"caption\":\"141116-N-PO203-042 ARABIAN GULF (Nov. 16, 2014) The Afloat Forward Staging Base (Interim) USS Ponce (ASB(I) 15) conducts an operational demonstration of the Office of Naval Research (ONR)-sponsored Laser Weapon System (LaWS) while deployed to the Arabian Gulf. (U.S. Navy photo by John F. Williams\/Released)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/\",\"name\":\"Keeping up with conflict: weapons reviews and the laws of war | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-11T01:12:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-11T01:12:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/08025f19d84978fd8ff0db9a71abb2d1\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Keeping up with conflict: weapons reviews and the laws of war\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/08025f19d84978fd8ff0db9a71abb2d1\",\"name\":\"Patrick Griffiths\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0004e91eb78ed16602f3ca10096c9fd8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0004e91eb78ed16602f3ca10096c9fd8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Patrick Griffiths\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/patrick-griffiths\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Keeping up with conflict: weapons reviews and the laws of war | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Keeping up with conflict: weapons reviews and the laws of war | The Strategist","og_description":"As the Geneva Conventions turn 70, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is changing its guide to how new weapons are reviewed. Here\u2019s why we need to pay attention. After witnessing the Battle ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2019-07-11T01:12:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":665,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/1107laser.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Patrick Griffiths","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Patrick Griffiths","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/1107laser.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/1107laser.jpg","width":1000,"height":665,"caption":"141116-N-PO203-042 ARABIAN GULF (Nov. 16, 2014) The Afloat Forward Staging Base (Interim) USS Ponce (ASB(I) 15) conducts an operational demonstration of the Office of Naval Research (ONR)-sponsored Laser Weapon System (LaWS) while deployed to the Arabian Gulf. (U.S. Navy photo by John F. Williams\/Released)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/","name":"Keeping up with conflict: weapons reviews and the laws of war | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-07-11T01:12:13+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-11T01:12:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/08025f19d84978fd8ff0db9a71abb2d1"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/keeping-up-with-conflict-weapons-reviews-and-the-laws-of-war\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Keeping up with conflict: weapons reviews and the laws of war"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/08025f19d84978fd8ff0db9a71abb2d1","name":"Patrick Griffiths","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0004e91eb78ed16602f3ca10096c9fd8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0004e91eb78ed16602f3ca10096c9fd8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Patrick Griffiths"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/patrick-griffiths\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49012"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/983"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49012"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49012\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49016,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49012\/revisions\/49016"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/49015"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49012"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}