{"id":49410,"date":"2019-07-27T06:00:10","date_gmt":"2019-07-26T20:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=49410"},"modified":"2019-07-29T09:24:45","modified_gmt":"2019-07-28T23:24:45","slug":"how-not-to-defend-australia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/","title":{"rendered":"How not to defend Australia"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Hugh White\u2019s How to defend Australia<\/em> is an elegant book but also something of a party trick: engagingly clever but not realistic. It will be essential reading for every national security master\u2019s degree by coursework program for years to come. And it\u2019s fundamentally wrong on just about every judgement it contains. Any government that tried to implement it would damn Australia to a form of global and regional irrelevance that would make New Zealand look like a security colossus. Many will enjoy White\u2019s homage to a rising China and eulogy for a declining United States, but there\u2019s not a lot of data to support either thesis.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ll set out here the seven biggest nots of White in the interests of further promoting sales of the English-language edition.<\/p>\n

China\u2019s rise is not unstoppable<\/strong><\/p>\n

In a book that slips and slides like an eel on a roller coaster, White is, in fact, clear and consistent in his view of China. Everything he writes \u2018hinges on the rise of China and how it changes the distribution of wealth and power in Asia\u2019 (page 9). China\u2019s rise is effectively unstoppable, and China is determined \u2018to take America\u2019s place as the leading power\u2019 in Asia (page 10). Resistance will be futile because \u2018the more strenuously America tries to contain China, the more likely war will become\u2019 (page 12). This is pretty much the guts of White\u2019s argument. Everything thereafter follows as a footnote to the iron laws of gravity.<\/p>\n

This is a lot to hang a book on, and one of the oddities of White\u2019s approach is that he spends no time trying to prove his China thesis. There is actually very little about China in the book beyond the observation that, as the legendary Andrew Marshall said, \u2018You know, China is really big.\u2019 Well, yes, but China is also a country which for the last century and a half has reliably imploded every generation to reshape its political system, usually at the cost of millions of Chinese lives.<\/p>\n

No one could dismiss the possibility that such an internal convulsion could happen again. Further, China is surrounded by a bunch of countries like Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, India, Russia and the US that are simply not going to roll over for a tummy rub while bowing to inevitable Chinese greatness.<\/p>\n

White might counter that anticipating a reversal in China\u2019s fortunes is hardly a strategy either. What if China keeps unstoppably rising? A lot depends on the type of great power China may become. I very much doubt that President Xi Jinping can sustain the plan to make China look like mid-1930s Germany. This is a comparison White explicitly rejects, but a closer look at the system of political and social control the Chinese Communist Party is building, matched with its assertive overseas behaviour, points to a deeply worrying trajectory.<\/p>\n

If China rules the world, it will be a planet where there\u2019s oppressive conformity, a highly efficient police state and an ugly ideology of power and superiority. White seems to imply that the likely global response to this will be acquiescence. That\u2019s a big judgement but a profoundly ahistorical one. Although the costs could be high, I doubt the world will let China get away with it. On the other hand, a China that\u2019s liberal, tolerant and democratic (like modern Germany, or Taiwan for that matter) may emerge some day and it\u2019s surely in the world\u2019s interests to push it in that direction.<\/p>\n

America\u2019s fall is not inevitable<\/strong><\/p>\n

The other side of this coin is the thesis that America is pretty much a busted flush. White is more opaque here: \u2018Of course, America shall remain a very powerful country \u2026 and it will retain important interests in Asia that it will seek to uphold\u2019 (page 15). But apart from that caveat the rest of the book would make you think that Uncle Sam had already checked out of Hotel Asia\u2013Pacific. In White\u2019s judgement there\u2019s simply no way that Australia could rely on such a clapped-out partner. Indeed, the only question worth pondering is whether America\u2019s slide down the strategic plug hole will be fast or somewhat slower.<\/p>\n

Well, tell that to the US Marines participating in Exercise Talisman Sabre who stormed Langham beach<\/a> last week in \u2018the largest Australian-led amphibious landing and offensive assault since the Second World War\u2019. There isn\u2019t a scintilla of evidence to support White\u2019s thesis and a great deal of observable data pointing to a powerful United States reinforcing its position in Asia. A booming economy, sprightly demographics, first-rate innovation, an immense capacity for reinvention and an instinct for alliance-building that even Donald Trump can\u2019t stifle forever\u2014these are all essential American qualities.<\/p>\n

Yes, America wants its allies to do more and is exasperated with security free-riding. But America is not in the Pacific to do Australia a favour. It\u2019s here because of its own strategic interests and has no more capacity to withdraw from the region than Tasmania can abandon Bass Strait.<\/p>\n

The real question is not whether America will cede security leadership in Asia but rather the manner of its engagement with the region. It must be said that Trump is doing more than Barack Obama did. We should be so lucky.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s not just about size<\/strong><\/p>\n

At base, White\u2019s unit of measurement for strategic importance is size. But size doesn\u2019t explain everything about strategic weight. Nor does it explain nothing about strategic weight. What matters is what countries do with their strategic weight. White\u2019s approach doesn\u2019t accept that subtlety. His is a world in which big fish eat small fish and that\u2019s all you need to know about China\u2014or, for that matter, India, Japan and Indonesia, all of which he thinks could threaten Australia.<\/p>\n

Likewise, White\u2019s size theorem consigns Australia to the tiddler category. He gloomily concludes, \u2018We could never hope to shape the major power balance in Northeast Asia or elsewhere independently\u2019 (page 85). But, in coalitions, Australia did just that in 1945 and 1953.<\/p>\n

Australia is not alone<\/strong><\/p>\n

The size fixation creates an oddly atomised world where states rocket around like differently sized billiard balls and smack into each other. There\u2019s no possibility for lasting or meaningful collaboration, no ability to align because of shared values or strategic outlook, and no acceptance that the world can evolve norms of behaviour that limit consumption of tiddlers by the big fish. Even for a grizzled strategic realist like me, White\u2019s world of dominance by size looks a bit cartoonish and not a reflection of the more complex reality.<\/p>\n

Perhaps this is what leads him to the book\u2019s most artificial point, when China and Australia square off into a conflict, mano a mano<\/em>. Hang on, where are all the other fish? They have fled the tank, leaving it to us with our 36 submarines and hundreds of combat aircraft to bat away at the opponent much like taking turns in a game of battleship.<\/p>\n

But Australia is not alone. We have always fought in concert with friends and allies. Almost always that fight has been to preserve an international system that represents more to our interests than the ability to patrol our maritime approaches. If we were ever to be in a world where China wanted to physically attack us, that would mean the entire global order had broken down. We would hardly be alone in wanting to resist a Chinese military advance.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s not the late 1980s<\/strong><\/p>\n

White\u2019s force structure proposals have been widely discussed, including in T<\/em>he Strategist<\/em><\/a>, so I won\u2019t deal with them in detail here, save to note that his conclusion that ultimately we have to fight at home and alone drives him down the track of a very 1980s-looking military. Thus we are back in the world of shaping an army to \u2018contain any adversary forces that make it ashore\u2019 (page 125). We apply \u2018highly offensive\u2019 tactical operations to disable enemy forces moving towards Australia, perhaps even attacking the bases from which they deploy.<\/p>\n

If this feels like a back-to-the-future scenario that\u2019s because it is. White trialled some of this thinking in the 1997 statement of Australia\u2019s strategic policy<\/a><\/em>. At the time, I was chief of staff to defence minister Ian McLachlan and we thought ourselves cluey strategists for arguing that \u2018our self-reliant posture may require us to undertake highly offensive operations in defence of our country\u2019. Back then, this wasn\u2019t intended to substitute for the US alliance or thorough-going efforts to work with neighbours to prevent maritime incursions.<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t think White succeeds in making the case for structuring the force for independent defence against maritime attack. It\u2019s no more persuasive now than it was a generation ago; in fact, it\u2019s less so, because it misses changes in technology such as the cyber threat to critical infrastructure and the use of grey-zone warfare by authoritarian regimes. The further forward we can start our defence efforts the better for the security of the continent.<\/p>\n

Just adding \u2018not\u2019 is not a way of not saying something<\/strong><\/p>\n

White is a master of advancing an argument by building the case for what something is not. Thus it is \u2018far from unlikely\u2019 that China will become the \u2018region\u2019s leading power\u2019 (page 38); \u2018strategic independence does not mean we would always stand by ourselves\u2019 (page 46); and when it comes to nuclear weapons, \u2018I neither predict \u2026 nor do I advocate \u2026 but the question is one we will not be able to avoid\u2019 (page 231). Not for nothing is White regarded as a gifted writer, but I puzzle over this reluctance to offer sharper, simpler judgements. An edifice is constructed but one wonders at the end of the day if White really buys this structure.<\/p>\n

Capitulation is not a strategy<\/strong><\/p>\n

Finishing How to defend Australia<\/em> I was left with the thought that White seems almost to have talked himself into thinking that it just can\u2019t be done. \u2018When we weigh the costs of independent defence \u2026 we might decide that the risks do not justify the costs. Rather than bear those costs we could elect to take our chances\u2019 (page 20). He hopes that China\u2019s leaders will learn that \u2018they would be better off exercising primacy with a light touch\u2019 and indeed \u2018the more we go along with Beijing, the lower our strategic risk will be\u2019 (page 41).<\/p>\n

White concludes that Christmas and Cocos Islands would be hard to defend and worries about \u2018emotive questions about how much we should be willing to pay to defend every part of our sovereign territory\u2019 (page 129). That strikes me as a particularly despairing judgement. White rightly worries about how a potential attacker might seek forward lodgements in places that would help enable attacks on Australia. But what a crestfallen judgement for a person who has spent his professional life in and around Australian defence policy. Will anyone heed White\u2019s call for reforming the defence organisation? He ends the book by saying it will probably take \u2018some tectonic event\u2019 for our leaders to realise that change is necessary. \u2018By then of course, it may be too late\u2019 (page 299).<\/p>\n

White\u2019s proposals about the alliance with the US, about relations with China and other countries, on force structure and on nuclear weapons are not the right strategies for Australia. He\u2019s most certainly right to worry about the capacities of senior policymakers to effect sweeping change and he\u2019s correct on the need to lift defence spending. The tectonic shock he anticipates isn\u2019t some future possibility but a current reality that is jolting Australia daily. I hope his overall pessimism is unfounded.<\/p>\n

All that said, don\u2019t not buy the book. You should engage with it, admire its lithe contours and work through its artifices until you have thought your way to a better strategic place about Australia\u2019s defence.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Hugh White\u2019s How to defend Australia is an elegant book but also something of a party trick: engagingly clever but not realistic. It will be essential reading for every national security master\u2019s degree by coursework …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":49411,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[131,52,1114,279],"class_list":["post-49410","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-anzus","tag-china","tag-defence","tag-force-structure","dinkus-defending-australia"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nHow not to defend Australia | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How not to defend Australia | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Hugh White\u2019s How to defend Australia is an elegant book but also something of a party trick: engagingly clever but not realistic. It will be essential reading for every national security master\u2019s degree by coursework ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-26T20:00:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-28T23:24:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2961819266_4ebc50cc38_z.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"420\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter Jennings\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter Jennings\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2961819266_4ebc50cc38_z.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2961819266_4ebc50cc38_z.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":420},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/\",\"name\":\"How not to defend Australia | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-26T20:00:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-28T23:24:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How not to defend Australia\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548\",\"name\":\"Peter Jennings\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Peter Jennings\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/peter-jennings\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How not to defend Australia | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How not to defend Australia | The Strategist","og_description":"Hugh White\u2019s How to defend Australia is an elegant book but also something of a party trick: engagingly clever but not realistic. It will be essential reading for every national security master\u2019s degree by coursework ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2019-07-26T20:00:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-28T23:24:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":420,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2961819266_4ebc50cc38_z.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Peter Jennings","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter Jennings","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2961819266_4ebc50cc38_z.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/2961819266_4ebc50cc38_z.jpg","width":640,"height":420},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/","name":"How not to defend Australia | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-07-26T20:00:10+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-28T23:24:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/how-not-to-defend-australia\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How not to defend Australia"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548","name":"Peter Jennings","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Peter Jennings"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/peter-jennings\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49410"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49410"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49410\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49425,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49410\/revisions\/49425"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/49411"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49410"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49410"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}