{"id":50471,"date":"2019-09-10T15:00:17","date_gmt":"2019-09-10T05:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=50471"},"modified":"2019-09-10T19:05:03","modified_gmt":"2019-09-10T09:05:03","slug":"kashmir-the-international-dimension","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/","title":{"rendered":"Kashmir: the international dimension"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

India\u2019s decision last month to revoke Kashmir\u2019s autonomy and statehood, break it into two union territories and merge them fully with the Indian union caught everyone unawares. The changes give effect to the Bharatiya Janata Party\u2019s vision of India<\/a> as one nation and one people under one constitution. Indians have reacted with jubilation (majority), concern at the lack of consultation and the military lockdown in Kashmir (many), and criticism of the threat to Kashmir\u2019s cultural identity, especially if India\u2019s sole Muslim-majority state\u2019s demographic balance<\/a> is altered (minority).<\/p>\n

India\u2019s protestations notwithstanding, Kashmir has been internationally recognised as disputed territory. The surprise development might cause immediate diplomatic ructions, but in time the integration of Kashmir will help consolidate the argument that the issue is purely internal. In the military skirmishes with Pakistan in February, the self-defeating neglect of public diplomacy<\/a> cost India dearly in the global coverage of the competing narratives. Learning from that, the government has decided to engage with the foreign media<\/a>, but its performance remains amateurish.<\/p>\n

From the beginning, Pakistan has taken the initiative on Kashmir and India has had to react. Suddenly Pakistan is in the unaccustomed position of reacting to India\u2019s audacious initiative. A rattled Prime Minister Imran Khan lashed out<\/a> in an over-the-top tweet on 25 August: \u2018India has been captured, as Germany had been captured by Nazis, by a fascist, racist Hindu Supremacist ideology and leadership.\u2019<\/p>\n

Muslims comprise more than 14% of Indians and Hindu and Muslim populations increased by 17% and 25%<\/a>, respectively, between 2001 and 2011. Hindus comprise under 2% of Pakistan\u2019s population, down from around 20% at independence. Indian diplomats have been bafflingly reticent in hammering home this telling statistic every time Pakistan raises the plight of Indian Muslims.<\/p>\n

Pakistan has downgraded its diplomatic ties and suspended trade with India, but has met with little success in courting global support. The use of state-sponsored terrorists has become a major liability for Pakistan in polite global society. India\u2019s military is more powerful and Prime Minister Narendra Modi\u2019s government raised the cost of sub-conventional hybrid warfare significantly by launching retaliatory missile strikes deep inside Pakistan in February. Ironically, writes Ayesha Siddiqa<\/a>, an expert on Pakistan\u2019s military, India\u2019s actions in Kashmir could help to change the governance balance in Pakistan by underlining the limited military options and the need for civilian-led diplomacy in countering India.<\/p>\n

China and Pakistan have extolled<\/a> their all-weather friendship as \u2018higher than the Himalayas, deeper than the deepest ocean, and sweeter than honey\u2019. China took the Kashmir problem to the UN Security Council <\/a>but failed to get traction from anyone else in the closed-door meeting. Its support for Pakistan was conditioned by caution in not wanting unfavourable attention directed towards its own significantly harsher treatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang.<\/p>\n

Amid the protracted anti-China protests in Hong Kong, Beijing would also want to retain freedom to act robustly there. So it was content to argue that the mere fact of placing the item on the Security Council\u2019s agenda was proof that the dispute was international and India has obligations to the world community. Its greater potential concern is likely to be Indian military preparations in Ladakh, which borders China directly.<\/p>\n

Pakistani-American scholar Adil Najam makes a plausible case for US mediation<\/a>. President Donald Trump had earlier offered to mediate<\/a> the Kashmir dispute, but India denied<\/a> that Modi had requested US arbitration. The imminence of a Pakistan-brokered US\u2013Taliban deal on Afghanistan affected India\u2019s Kashmir calculus. That gives Pakistan leverage in persuading the US to intercede in Kashmir and has raised the prospect of Afghanistan-origin insurgents and arms flooding into Kashmir after America\u2019s withdrawal.<\/p>\n

Trump and Modi met on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Biarritz, France. Modi\u2019s presence and Khan\u2019s absence were a telling indicator of the gulf in diplomatic heft. At the joint press conference, Trump said<\/a> he was good friends with both PMs, that \u2018they can manage it themselves\u2019 and that Modi feels he has the Kashmir situation under control.<\/p>\n

The foreign ministry of Bangladesh<\/a>, the third populous Muslim country on the subcontinent, said the matter was \u2018an internal issue of India\u2019. Russia washed its hands of the dispute<\/a> on the same argument. With the Gulf states, \u2018Pakistan is likely to interpret neutrality as an implicitly pro-Indian position<\/a>\u2019. The United Arab Emirates ambassador fully endorsed India\u2019s case<\/a>, saying the decision would \u2018improve social justice and security and confidence of the people in the local governance and will encourage further stability and peace\u2019. On 24 August, Modi received the UAE\u2019s highest civilian award<\/a> for boosting bilateral relations.<\/p>\n

As Kashmir\u2019s indigenous insurgency was captured by Islamists and the call for independence was displaced by the agenda to establish a Sharia-dominated state, the world lost interest in supporting the creation of a semi-independent Islamist enclave at the crossroads of Central and South Asia. The key to a successful Kashmir policy is a successful economic policy that lifts Kashmir\u2019s boat on the tide of India\u2019s prosperity. This is where the Modi government has fallen short. Its policy failures and timidity are now starting to decelerate growth<\/a>, hurt business and consumer confidence, deter investment and damage job prospects.<\/p>\n

The second potential problem for India is the spectre of mass civilian unrest, resurgent insurgency and Pakistan-sponsored asymmetric warfare that provokes a repressive crackdown, keeps Kashmir on the boil and draws international condemnation. Disaffection and distrust among Kashmiris have been rising alarmingly.<\/p>\n

Last year\u2019s report<\/a> by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on abuses in Kashmir was damning. It noted the effective impunity for deaths, disappearances, sexual offences and other abuses due to various laws that have \u2018created structures that obstruct the normal course of law, impede accountability and jeopardize the right to remedy for victims of human rights violations\u2019. The promises of development, investment, jobs and security might placate Kashmiris temporarily, but only delivery on the promises will help to restore normality.<\/p>\n

Barring a major unravelling of the internal security situation, world powers will remain preoccupied with major international issues like nuclear threats from North Korea and Iran, the possible collapse of the global nuclear order, Brexit, the China\u2013US trade war, and the Amazon fires and climate change. Few countries will waste political capital in pressuring India on Kashmir.<\/p>\n

If India succeeds in stabilising the internal situation, restoring normality and promoting economic growth and development, most countries will accept that Kashmir is an internal matter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

India\u2019s decision last month to revoke Kashmir\u2019s autonomy and statehood, break it into two union territories and merge them fully with the Indian union caught everyone unawares. The changes give effect to the Bharatiya Janata …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":555,"featured_media":50475,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[69,2315,251],"class_list":["post-50471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-india","tag-kashmir","tag-pakistan"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nKashmir: the international dimension | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kashmir: the international dimension | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"India\u2019s decision last month to revoke Kashmir\u2019s autonomy and statehood, break it into two union territories and merge them fully with the Indian union caught everyone unawares. The changes give effect to the Bharatiya Janata ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-10T05:00:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-10T09:05:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/GettyImages-1166922608.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ramesh Thakur\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ramesh Thakur\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/GettyImages-1166922608.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/GettyImages-1166922608.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":683,\"caption\":\"SRINAGAR, KASHMIR, INDIA - SEPTEMBER 09: A Kashmiri man reads a newspaper in front of closed shops covered with graffiti in the closed commercial hub of the city center during curfew like restrictions on September 09, 2019 in Srinagar, the summer capital of Indian administered Kashmir, India. Indian authorities have deployed thousands of government forces in Kashmir after India revoked articles 370 and 35A. The media are still facing a continued communications blackout as the blockade goes in to a second month. Article 35A of the Indian Constitution was an article that empowered the Jammu and Kashmir state's legislature to define permanent residents of the state and provided special rights and privileges to those permanent residents, also preventing non-locals from buying or owning property in the state. Prior to 1947, Jammu and Kashmir was a princely state under the British Empire. It was added to the Constitution through a Presidential Order. The Constitution Order 1954, (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) was issued by the President of India on 14 May, 1954 in accordance with Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, and with the concurrence of the Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir. Kashmir has been a state under siege, with both India and Pakistan laying claim to it. Human rights organizations say more than 80,000 have died in the two decade long conflict with the Indian government claiming the number as 42,000. (Photo by Yawar Nazir\/ Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/\",\"name\":\"Kashmir: the international dimension | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-10T05:00:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-10T09:05:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/574186be0185981dcff8086fc6885eab\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kashmir: the international dimension\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/574186be0185981dcff8086fc6885eab\",\"name\":\"Ramesh Thakur\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ebbc5476615a825e171bc25880ed22e1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ebbc5476615a825e171bc25880ed22e1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ramesh Thakur\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/ramesh-thakur\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kashmir: the international dimension | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kashmir: the international dimension | The Strategist","og_description":"India\u2019s decision last month to revoke Kashmir\u2019s autonomy and statehood, break it into two union territories and merge them fully with the Indian union caught everyone unawares. The changes give effect to the Bharatiya Janata ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2019-09-10T05:00:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-10T09:05:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/GettyImages-1166922608.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ramesh Thakur","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ramesh Thakur","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/GettyImages-1166922608.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/GettyImages-1166922608.jpg","width":1024,"height":683,"caption":"SRINAGAR, KASHMIR, INDIA - SEPTEMBER 09: A Kashmiri man reads a newspaper in front of closed shops covered with graffiti in the closed commercial hub of the city center during curfew like restrictions on September 09, 2019 in Srinagar, the summer capital of Indian administered Kashmir, India. Indian authorities have deployed thousands of government forces in Kashmir after India revoked articles 370 and 35A. The media are still facing a continued communications blackout as the blockade goes in to a second month. Article 35A of the Indian Constitution was an article that empowered the Jammu and Kashmir state's legislature to define permanent residents of the state and provided special rights and privileges to those permanent residents, also preventing non-locals from buying or owning property in the state. Prior to 1947, Jammu and Kashmir was a princely state under the British Empire. It was added to the Constitution through a Presidential Order. The Constitution Order 1954, (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) was issued by the President of India on 14 May, 1954 in accordance with Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, and with the concurrence of the Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir. Kashmir has been a state under siege, with both India and Pakistan laying claim to it. Human rights organizations say more than 80,000 have died in the two decade long conflict with the Indian government claiming the number as 42,000. (Photo by Yawar Nazir\/ Getty Images)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/","name":"Kashmir: the international dimension | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-09-10T05:00:17+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-10T09:05:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/574186be0185981dcff8086fc6885eab"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/kashmir-the-international-dimension\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kashmir: the international dimension"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/574186be0185981dcff8086fc6885eab","name":"Ramesh Thakur","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ebbc5476615a825e171bc25880ed22e1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ebbc5476615a825e171bc25880ed22e1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ramesh Thakur"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/ramesh-thakur\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50471"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/555"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50471"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50471\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50484,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50471\/revisions\/50484"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50475"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}