{"id":50541,"date":"2019-09-13T06:00:58","date_gmt":"2019-09-12T20:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=50541"},"modified":"2019-09-12T17:21:52","modified_gmt":"2019-09-12T07:21:52","slug":"australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia\u2019s nuclear-weapons debate: shifting the focus"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Australia\u2019s national security community is once again in the midst of a debate on whether or not Australia should acquire nuclear weapons. This latest round was initiated by the publication of Hugh White\u2019s new book, How to defend Australia<\/em><\/a>, which includes a chapter on the possibility of Australia developing a nuclear capability.<\/p>\n

Having a debate on the nation\u2019s future security is a good thing, even a necessary one, because it recognises that a reconsideration of national security is needed as Australia navigates a more dangerous and problematic era. While for many it\u2019s natural that nuclear weapons be included in such a discussion, it shouldn\u2019t take too long to dismiss them.<\/p>\n

There are two reasons why the discussion will be a brief one: the lack of wisdom in relying for security on weapons that can\u2019t be used, and their irrelevance to Australia\u2019s most pressing future security risk\u2014climate change.<\/p>\n

Every security thinker and military professional who supports Australia joining the nuclear club can do so only if they accept the following consequence: the result of a use of nuclear weapons would likely be the extermination of the human species, as well as many others. Some may counter that they\u2019ve been used before and, except for the victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, humanity has gone on to enjoy the greatest period of prosperity that it has ever had. It\u2019s easy to forget that the United States dropped only two bombs because it didn\u2019t have more. Today, that\u2019s not the case.<\/p>\n

Anyone who authorises a nuclear attack against another nuclear-armed state is deluding themselves if they think escalation will not result. Some nuclear-weapons states field thousands of these devices, each more powerful than those used in 1945, and the employment of even a small percentage would still trigger an extinction-level event. Those who were lucky to survive the initial blasts would eventually expire in the ensuing nuclear winter.<\/p>\n

It can be comforting to consider these weapons in the abstract, but once they\u2019re created the consequences of their use becomes real. Defence thinkers need to factor in what such weapons can do; otherwise, the current debate is nothing more than a game.<\/p>\n

The second reason for Australia to reject nuclear weapons is that they have no utility to address the most critical security risk facing Australia. White\u2019s book doesn\u2019t even give climate change a passing reference, and it has been largely absent from the current debate. Unfortunately, the discourse of security thinkers is dominated by analysis of the possibility and consequences of state-on-state conflict, with occasional mentions of non-state actors.<\/p>\n

Nation-states are human constructs. They are part of the made environment. But what many commentators too often overlook is that the made environment exists within a natural environment. For thousands of years the natural world has been relatively benign, which has allowed humanity to propagate and construct the civilisation that we know today.<\/p>\n

While defence thinkers may be comfortable talking about the shift in power that is underway in East Asia, they display less enthusiasm for discussing the security implications of climate change that is happening at the same time. Of the two, however, climate change is the far more significant threat, not just for Australia, but for all of humanity.<\/p>\n

The question to ask in the current debate, therefore, is what part nuclear weapons can play in mitigating the security risks of climate change. My sense is that nuclear weapons have no utility in such a scenario. In fact, the opportunity costs of investing in a nuclear capability would consume resources that Australia could allocate to capabilities that are more relevant.<\/p>\n

The best we can expect from the current episode of climate change is that the overall experience will be catastrophic for all of humanity. In part, this is a prediction, but it\u2019s one based on the fact that all prior climate change events that humanity has undergone have been catastrophic. This one is likely to be the same, especially as efforts to minimise its effects have been slow to gain traction.<\/p>\n

Past climate events suggest that many states will come under immense strain as climatic shifts disrupt their access to essential resources. Already-fragile states won\u2019t be able to bear the additional pressure and intra-state conflicts will likely hasten their collapse. As societal support structures such as public health fail, epidemics and famines will break out and mass migrations will occur. These societies will have to make hard decisions if any of their people are to survive. Many of these fragile states sit within Australia\u2019s primary area of interest and the Australian Defence Force may need to become involved.<\/p>\n

Nuclear weapons will offer no assistance in such a situation. Rather, what the ADF will need is more medical, engineering and strategic and tactical lift, for example, and the greater numbers of personnel essential to separate warring factions of a collapsing society. These capabilities and the means to get them to where they are needed should be the priority, not nuclear weapons.<\/p>\n

Defence thinkers can provide answers only to the questions they actually ask. The current debate has been robust and wide-ranging, but the proposals that have been made are derived from asking the wrong questions. A solution that includes the extermination of the species is not a useful one. Nor is one that offers little relevance to the main risk humanity faces. From the point of view of climate change and human survival, nuclear weapons are a non-starter. Instead, different questions need to be posed so that a more useful and relevant debate can be held.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Australia\u2019s national security community is once again in the midst of a debate on whether or not Australia should acquire nuclear weapons. This latest round was initiated by the publication of Hugh White\u2019s new book, …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":50543,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[44,17,283,356],"class_list":["post-50541","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australian-defence-force","tag-australia","tag-climate-change","tag-nuclear-weapons","dinkus-defending-australia"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAustralia\u2019s nuclear-weapons debate: shifting the focus | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Australia\u2019s nuclear-weapons debate: shifting the focus | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Australia\u2019s national security community is once again in the midst of a debate on whether or not Australia should acquire nuclear weapons. This latest round was initiated by the publication of Hugh White\u2019s new book, ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-12T20:00:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-12T07:21:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/20181010adf8246638_001-e1568272712802.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"900\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"506\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Albert Palazzo\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Albert Palazzo\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/20181010adf8246638_001-e1568272712802.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/20181010adf8246638_001-e1568272712802.jpg\",\"width\":900,\"height\":506,\"caption\":\"Royal Australian Navy sailor, Leading Seaman Imagery Specialist Jake Badior, documenting the damage in Palu following an earthquake and tsunami as part of Operation Indonesia Assist 2018. *** Local Caption *** The Australian Defence Force supported a whole of Australian Government effort to deliver humanitarian aid to Indonesia following an earthquake and tsunami that struck the island of Sulawesi on 28 September 2018. The relief included 'Family Kits' which contained kitchen items, a hygiene kit, bed nets, blankets and sleeping mats, a toolkit, and tarpaulins. A Royal Australian Air Force C-130 Hercules aircraft transported the first delivery of essential supplies on 4 October 2018. A Royal Australian Air Force C-17 Globemaster aircraft arrived in Balikpapan, Indonesia on 7 October 2018 with 16 further pallets of humanitarian aid supplies including tents and generators. Australia will deliver more humanitarian aid and continue to work closely with the Indonesian Government to help those affected by this tragedy. To date, Australia has committed over $10.25 million to support the Indonesian Government and humanitarian partners in the tsunami and earthquake relief response.\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/\",\"name\":\"Australia\u2019s nuclear-weapons debate: shifting the focus | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-09-12T20:00:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-12T07:21:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9c99dd8fa0c6f5d6c8bf39c7632994c2\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Australia\u2019s nuclear-weapons debate: shifting the focus\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9c99dd8fa0c6f5d6c8bf39c7632994c2\",\"name\":\"Albert Palazzo\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/46c0d5f0201461049fc621e3fbe0c139?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/46c0d5f0201461049fc621e3fbe0c139?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Albert Palazzo\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/albert-palazzo\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Australia\u2019s nuclear-weapons debate: shifting the focus | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Australia\u2019s nuclear-weapons debate: shifting the focus | The Strategist","og_description":"Australia\u2019s national security community is once again in the midst of a debate on whether or not Australia should acquire nuclear weapons. This latest round was initiated by the publication of Hugh White\u2019s new book, ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2019-09-12T20:00:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-12T07:21:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":900,"height":506,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/20181010adf8246638_001-e1568272712802.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Albert Palazzo","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Albert Palazzo","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/20181010adf8246638_001-e1568272712802.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/20181010adf8246638_001-e1568272712802.jpg","width":900,"height":506,"caption":"Royal Australian Navy sailor, Leading Seaman Imagery Specialist Jake Badior, documenting the damage in Palu following an earthquake and tsunami as part of Operation Indonesia Assist 2018. *** Local Caption *** The Australian Defence Force supported a whole of Australian Government effort to deliver humanitarian aid to Indonesia following an earthquake and tsunami that struck the island of Sulawesi on 28 September 2018. The relief included 'Family Kits' which contained kitchen items, a hygiene kit, bed nets, blankets and sleeping mats, a toolkit, and tarpaulins. A Royal Australian Air Force C-130 Hercules aircraft transported the first delivery of essential supplies on 4 October 2018. A Royal Australian Air Force C-17 Globemaster aircraft arrived in Balikpapan, Indonesia on 7 October 2018 with 16 further pallets of humanitarian aid supplies including tents and generators. Australia will deliver more humanitarian aid and continue to work closely with the Indonesian Government to help those affected by this tragedy. To date, Australia has committed over $10.25 million to support the Indonesian Government and humanitarian partners in the tsunami and earthquake relief response."},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/","name":"Australia\u2019s nuclear-weapons debate: shifting the focus | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-09-12T20:00:58+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-12T07:21:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9c99dd8fa0c6f5d6c8bf39c7632994c2"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-nuclear-weapons-debate-shifting-the-focus\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Australia\u2019s nuclear-weapons debate: shifting the focus"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9c99dd8fa0c6f5d6c8bf39c7632994c2","name":"Albert Palazzo","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/46c0d5f0201461049fc621e3fbe0c139?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/46c0d5f0201461049fc621e3fbe0c139?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Albert Palazzo"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/albert-palazzo\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50541"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50541"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50541\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50547,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50541\/revisions\/50547"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50543"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50541"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50541"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50541"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}