{"id":51080,"date":"2019-10-08T11:43:34","date_gmt":"2019-10-08T00:43:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=51080"},"modified":"2019-10-08T11:43:50","modified_gmt":"2019-10-08T00:43:50","slug":"australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia\u2019s new frigates will be fit for the future. Our submarines should be too"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

One of the pearls in my memory of working in a big bureaucracy showed how things that make sense inside it simply don\u2019t in the outside world. It\u2019s a corrosive dynamic that applies to how the Defence Department\u2019s decades-long megaprojects\u2014whether frigates, submarines or even armoured fighting vehicles\u2014are designed and implemented. And it must be addressed\u2014probably by external pressure and ministerial direction.<\/p>\n

I was returning to Defence after a couple of years in the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet and at the time had a pretty racy BlackBerry mobile, the latest version. Arriving back at Defence I was told to hand it over and take an older, chunkier model instead. When I asked why I couldn\u2019t keep the new phone from the same manufacturer, I was told, \u2018We don\u2019t use them here. Defence bought a job lot of this [chunky old] model a few years ago at a discount and we\u2019re giving them out until we\u2019ve got none left.\u2019<\/p>\n

After muttering about how if I went home to proudly tell my wife I\u2019d bought a decade\u2019s supply of mobiles for the family because I got 10% off, she\u2019d say something predictable and unsupportive, I took the phone. It did less, less well, than the one I gave up.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, this mindset of setting requirements today that don\u2019t make sense in the future seems to apply to how the Defence architects of the $79\u00a0billion future submarine project are working. In better news, the BAE designers of the Hunter-class future frigate seem to understand that, if the design is going to last beyond its early days in the 2030s, it needs to have large, inherent flexibility. This is to give the design some solid future-proofing to accommodate changes and capability additions that we don\u2019t even know about now.<\/p>\n

The nine frigates Australia will get for its $35\u00a0billion are to be equipped with the latest US Aegis combat system, missile launch cells and advanced passive and active sonars, and an acoustic array for underwater search, as well as an embarked anti-submarine helicopter and CEA\u2019s fabulous phased array radar. But that\u2019s all so 2019. Because the designers\u2014and the Royal Navy lead customer\u2014know that military technology\u2014along with civil technology with strong military applications\u2014is evolving so fast, they know these state-of-the-art systems by themselves, even upgraded, wouldn\u2019t guarantee the frigate\u2019s combat edge in the 2030s.<\/p>\n

So, unlike the two other frigate designs in the competition, BAE took a distinctive and smart approach to building flexibility into the core design of the frigate. This was smart because the painful history of large-scale redesigns of platforms to retrofit significant new capabilities fills the archives of various countries\u2019 auditors of big defence projects. It is much harder and much more costly to do a major redesign than to incorporate flexibility early on.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s why the Hunter-class frigate has a large multi-mission bay<\/a>. The integrated mission bay and hangar will be \u2018capable of supporting multiple helicopters, UUVs [unmanned underwater vehicles], boats, mission loads and disaster relief stores. A launcher can be provided for fixed-wing UAV [unmanned aerial vehicle] operation\u2019. The designers have allowed for the ship\u2019s systems to generate extra power for whatever is operated from the mission bay, and the ship\u2019s centre of gravity has been set to allow new systems to be carried in the bay without affecting overall ship performance.<\/p>\n

This means that the frigate is very likely to be able to launch, recover and operate with a wide range of types, sizes and configurations of armed and unarmed UAVs (drones), unmanned surface vessels and even unmanned underwater vessels. Some may well be launched from the missile cells near the bow.<\/p>\n

Turning to the Attack class, we\u2019re told it will be a \u2018regionally superior\u2019 submarine. It will evolve over the course of the build; the first of the 12 delivered sometime after 2035 will be quite different from the last one in 2054. And it will adapt to new technologies over this time. That all sounds great until you unpack what it doesn\u2019t say.<\/p>\n

We already know that a key element in the new submarine\u2019s design philosophy is to only have capabilities that are already \u2018proven at sea\u2019 in the design for the first boat. That has led to the program office staying with lead\u2013acid batteries, which have powered submarines since World War I, for now, even as other navies and even Naval Group, the submarine\u2019s designer, say that new battery types are ready for safe operation in its submarines already, let alone by the 2030s.<\/p>\n

Beyond this overall aversion to opportunity, though, in a briefing a couple of weeks ago to journalists, the program office confirmed that the future submarine would only be able to launch and recover UUVs that fit through its torpedo tubes or between the inner and outer hull skins.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s an incredible limitation on the sizes, shapes and numbers of unmanned underwater systems other than torpedoes that this weapon system costing $79\u00a0billion (ASPI\u2019s \u2018out-turned\u2019 dollars estimate) will be able to launch and recover.<\/p>\n

Interestingly, the Swedes have taken the design that became our navy\u2019s current Collins-class submarine and \u2018evolved\u2019 it by doing things like fitting a new section into the hull so it can launch missiles from large vertical tubes. And they\u2019re bidding to build an evolved \u2018Son of Collins\u2019 for the Dutch, with the first submarine to be launched in the late 2020s. Modularity is key to the Swedes\u2019 approach. They are using their existing Gotland-class submarines to trial modules they\u2019ll put into their new submarines.<\/p>\n

The big vertical launch tubes will allow the Swedish design to launch and recover lots of different configurations of missiles, UAVs and UUVs. And, if it turns out that missiles are less valuable than other unmanned systems, it\u2019ll be much easier to use this vertical launch space as a flexible launch bay than to try to contort weapons into torpedo-shaped items.<\/p>\n

On top of this, the Swedes are fitting air-independent propulsion to allow the submarine to operate without surfacing for long periods of time. They\u2019re also designing in a \u2018multi-mission portal<\/a>\u2019 next to the torpedo tubes in the nose of the boat which will be large enough for the launch and retrieval of diverse mission payloads, from special-forces divers to manned and unmanned vehicles. Sounds like the future-proofing approach being taken with Australia\u2019s frigates.<\/p>\n

It won\u2019t matter if the Attack class is \u2018regionally superior\u2019 in a submarine-against-submarine battle in the 2030s if the boats get found and sunk by novel UUVs operated by an adversary that\u2019s more imaginative with its submarine design than Australia is being.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s still time for the future submarine to really live up to its label. But it means thinking more imaginatively than any submarine program office that the big Defence bureaucracy seems able to put together.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s time to get some other ideas into the submarine program and into the design of the first boat. That\u2019s so that we don\u2019t end up with a high-risk project that does something worse than run over budget and schedule\u2014that produces a submarine and broader undersea capability program that is not \u2018regionally superior\u2019, and does so by design.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

One of the pearls in my memory of working in a big bureaucracy showed how things that make sense inside it simply don\u2019t in the outside world. It\u2019s a corrosive dynamic that applies to how …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":766,"featured_media":51086,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2436,2600,304],"class_list":["post-51080","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-attack-class","tag-hunter-class","tag-royal-australian-navy"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAustralia\u2019s new frigates will be fit for the future. Our submarines should be too | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Australia\u2019s new frigates will be fit for the future. Our submarines should be too | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"One of the pearls in my memory of working in a big bureaucracy showed how things that make sense inside it simply don\u2019t in the outside world. It\u2019s a corrosive dynamic that applies to how ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-10-08T00:43:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-10-08T00:43:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/submarine20810.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"746\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"497\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Michael Shoebridge\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Michael Shoebridge\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/submarine20810.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/submarine20810.jpg\",\"width\":746,\"height\":497},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/\",\"name\":\"Australia\u2019s new frigates will be fit for the future. Our submarines should be too | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-08T00:43:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-08T00:43:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/b7802124e14835ff19b5c244e962849f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Australia\u2019s new frigates will be fit for the future. Our submarines should be too\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/b7802124e14835ff19b5c244e962849f\",\"name\":\"Michael Shoebridge\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9ad669e65739d5a3f4bbc0e839d8a6b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9ad669e65739d5a3f4bbc0e839d8a6b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Michael Shoebridge\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/michael-shoebridge\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Australia\u2019s new frigates will be fit for the future. Our submarines should be too | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Australia\u2019s new frigates will be fit for the future. Our submarines should be too | The Strategist","og_description":"One of the pearls in my memory of working in a big bureaucracy showed how things that make sense inside it simply don\u2019t in the outside world. It\u2019s a corrosive dynamic that applies to how ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2019-10-08T00:43:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-10-08T00:43:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":746,"height":497,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/submarine20810.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Michael Shoebridge","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Michael Shoebridge","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/submarine20810.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/submarine20810.jpg","width":746,"height":497},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/","name":"Australia\u2019s new frigates will be fit for the future. Our submarines should be too | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-10-08T00:43:34+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-08T00:43:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/b7802124e14835ff19b5c244e962849f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-new-frigates-will-be-fit-for-the-future-our-submarines-should-be-too\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Australia\u2019s new frigates will be fit for the future. Our submarines should be too"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/b7802124e14835ff19b5c244e962849f","name":"Michael Shoebridge","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9ad669e65739d5a3f4bbc0e839d8a6b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9ad669e65739d5a3f4bbc0e839d8a6b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Michael Shoebridge"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/michael-shoebridge\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51080"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/766"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51080"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51080\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51087,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51080\/revisions\/51087"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51086"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51080"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51080"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51080"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}