{"id":51948,"date":"2019-11-18T06:00:16","date_gmt":"2019-11-17T19:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=51948"},"modified":"2019-11-17T20:35:35","modified_gmt":"2019-11-17T09:35:35","slug":"reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 1)"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Australia\u2019s Defence Department is a big beast that\u2019s hard to ride, much less steer.<\/p>\n

The complexities of kit, costs and strategy<\/a> have made it the most inquiry-prone animal in Canberra\u201450 reviews in five decades (35 significant reviews and many more supplementary reviews).<\/p>\n

As the most recent major report on the defence organisation\u2014the first principles review<\/a>\u2014noted in 2015: \u2018The sheer frequency of reviews over the past decade has meant that many were short-lived or simply overtaken by the next review. Often the recommended changes were not allowed to bed in before another review began.\u2019<\/p>\n

If any of the answers were simple or cheap, they\u2019d have been implemented long ago. The beast shifts slowly as reviews come and go.<\/p>\n

Arthur Tange\u2019s revolution<\/a> in 1973 started the long journey to transform the defence herd into a single beast and make the military tribes one. Tange\u2019s creation has a diarchic brain, with military and civilian sides; the creature spends a lot of energy just connecting its thoughts. After five decades of evolution, the habits and habitat of today\u2019s Russell Hill would still look rather familiar to Tange.<\/p>\n

The first principles review found that Defence\u2019s way of doing things was \u2018complicated, slow and inefficient in an environment which requires simplicity, greater agility and timely delivery. Waste, inefficiency and rework are palpable. Defence is suffering from a proliferation of structures, processes and systems with unclear accountabilities.\u2019<\/p>\n

Savour that recurring lament of reviews through the decades.<\/p>\n

Reviews happen for many reasons. Oppositions pledge to overhaul Defence as one of their promises to remake Canberra; and if they win power, a review is a promise that can be kept.<\/p>\n

Governments usually order reviews to tackle a bothersome headache or damp a crisis. After some time in office, though, they might reach for an all-purpose shake-up to express frustration, even anger<\/a>, at the cost and complexity of the creature.<\/p>\n

Defence white papers and strategic reviews are a special genre, a form of self-analysis using a geopolitical crystal ball and an equipment wish list. The beast tries to explain itself to government (and itself) while looking out from Russell at what\u2019s happening in other parts of the jungle.<\/p>\n

In line with the big beast metaphor, Peter Jennings channelled his inner naturalist to describe the lifecycle of a defence review as though it were a gnu or wildebeest<\/a> roaming the grasslands. Under wonderful punny headlines \u2018nothing Gnu here\u2019<\/a> and \u2018no Gnus is good news\u2019<\/a>, he records the tough truth that few reviews survive long enough to be fully implemented: \u2018Just as for Gnus in Africa, life is brutal and short on the policy veldt. Many reviews get trampled underfoot by newer processes.\u2019<\/p>\n

Life is hard for reviews because Defence\u2019s problems aren\u2019t just complex and costly; they reach beyond vital towards existential. As an example, see Paul Dibb\u2019s<\/a> account of why he was asked to report on Australia\u2019s defence capabilities in 1985 (one of the reviews that lived long enough to have a real impact).<\/p>\n

Dibb was called in after 12 months of internal argument, when Defence couldn\u2019t \u2018come to even a preliminary agreement on force structure priorities for the defence of Australia\u2019. Ponder that. Defence couldn\u2019t answer the question that\u2019s the heart of its existence: how do we defend Oz? The diarchic brain was in turmoil.<\/p>\n

Dibb describes the entrenched differences between the senior military and civilian hierarchies:<\/p>\n

The secretary and the chief of the defence force had got bogged down in exchanging 130\u00a0classified memos about the theology of defence policy on such concepts as defence warning time; low-level conflict; more substantial conflict; and whether Australia\u2019s unique geography should basically determine its force structure, as distinct from expeditionary forces for operations at great distance from Australia. Most of the ensuing debate was not constructive: it was hostile with little agreement on even basic principles for force structure priorities.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As the outsider, Dibb says his main policy aim was to get a \u2018workable compromise between these bitterly held positions\u2019.<\/p>\n

Workable compromise is the spur of choice for the beast.<\/p>\n

To be continued \u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Australia\u2019s Defence Department is a big beast that\u2019s hard to ride, much less steer. The complexities of kit, costs and strategy have made it the most inquiry-prone animal in Canberra\u201450 reviews in five decades (35 …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":79,"featured_media":51949,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[338,606,38,279],"class_list":["post-51948","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-defence-policy","tag-defence-white-paper","tag-department-of-defence","tag-force-structure"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nReviewing the Department of Defence (part 1) | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 1) | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Australia\u2019s Defence Department is a big beast that\u2019s hard to ride, much less steer. The complexities of kit, costs and strategy have made it the most inquiry-prone animal in Canberra\u201450 reviews in five decades (35 ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-17T19:00:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-17T09:35:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/20180415adf8611867_01-e1573983018473.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"700\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"445\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Graeme Dobell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Graeme Dobell\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/20180415adf8611867_01-e1573983018473.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/20180415adf8611867_01-e1573983018473.jpg\",\"width\":700,\"height\":445,\"caption\":\"An M1A1 Abrams tank from the 2nd Cavalry Regiment assaults through an obstacle breach blown by combat engineers of the 3rd Combat Engineer Regiment during combined arms training at Townsville Field Training Area. *** Local Caption *** Combined arms cooperation, integration of reservists and international participants into battlegroups have become key features in current military training. Cavalry, infantry and combat engineer units from the 3rd Brigade were recently joined by reservists from the 12th\/16th Hunter River Lancers and the British Royal Yeomanry for combined training. During the exercise, soldiers from 3rd Battalion, The Royal Australian Royal Australian Regiment (3 RAR) operated armoured personnel carriers (APCs) for the first time in a dedicated combined setting since they assumed their mechanised-infantry role. This 3RAR component \u0096 named \u0091Kapyong Warrior\u0092 \u0096 was undertaken whilst in close cooperation with the 2nd Cavalry Regiment (2 Cav Regt) who had their own bespoke component named \u0091Eagle Walk\u0092. Traditionally these unit level operational \u0091workups\u0092 run separately, but now with an armoured combined arms connection, synchonisation works to strengthen & enhance capability and increase efficiency. Integration of reserves and regular forces is considered the way forward in enabling the Army to reach its best operational capacity. In this training exercise, the concept involved the 12th\/16th Hunter River Lancers \u0096 a reserve cavalry regiment \u0096 assuming the role as cavalry scouts supporting 2 Cav Regt\u0092s offensive and reconnaissance capability in their component named \u0091Morlancourt\u0092. The exercise culminated on Sunday \u0096 15 Apr 18 \u0096 with a live fire obstacle breach and combined infantry and armoured assault also involving combat engineers from the 3rd Combat Engineer Regiment (3CER) conducting an explosives enabled breach in defences. They created two separate gaps that allowed the armour and mechanised infantry to pour through in spectacular fashion during the combined attack supported by an offensive support plan from the gunners of 4th Regiment, Royal Regiment of Australian Artillery.\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/\",\"name\":\"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 1) | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-17T19:00:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-17T09:35:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 1)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f\",\"name\":\"Graeme Dobell\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Graeme Dobell\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dobell\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 1) | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 1) | The Strategist","og_description":"Australia\u2019s Defence Department is a big beast that\u2019s hard to ride, much less steer. The complexities of kit, costs and strategy have made it the most inquiry-prone animal in Canberra\u201450 reviews in five decades (35 ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2019-11-17T19:00:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-17T09:35:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":700,"height":445,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/20180415adf8611867_01-e1573983018473.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Graeme Dobell","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Graeme Dobell","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/20180415adf8611867_01-e1573983018473.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/20180415adf8611867_01-e1573983018473.jpg","width":700,"height":445,"caption":"An M1A1 Abrams tank from the 2nd Cavalry Regiment assaults through an obstacle breach blown by combat engineers of the 3rd Combat Engineer Regiment during combined arms training at Townsville Field Training Area. *** Local Caption *** Combined arms cooperation, integration of reservists and international participants into battlegroups have become key features in current military training. Cavalry, infantry and combat engineer units from the 3rd Brigade were recently joined by reservists from the 12th\/16th Hunter River Lancers and the British Royal Yeomanry for combined training. During the exercise, soldiers from 3rd Battalion, The Royal Australian Royal Australian Regiment (3 RAR) operated armoured personnel carriers (APCs) for the first time in a dedicated combined setting since they assumed their mechanised-infantry role. This 3RAR component \u0096 named \u0091Kapyong Warrior\u0092 \u0096 was undertaken whilst in close cooperation with the 2nd Cavalry Regiment (2 Cav Regt) who had their own bespoke component named \u0091Eagle Walk\u0092. Traditionally these unit level operational \u0091workups\u0092 run separately, but now with an armoured combined arms connection, synchonisation works to strengthen & enhance capability and increase efficiency. Integration of reserves and regular forces is considered the way forward in enabling the Army to reach its best operational capacity. In this training exercise, the concept involved the 12th\/16th Hunter River Lancers \u0096 a reserve cavalry regiment \u0096 assuming the role as cavalry scouts supporting 2 Cav Regt\u0092s offensive and reconnaissance capability in their component named \u0091Morlancourt\u0092. The exercise culminated on Sunday \u0096 15 Apr 18 \u0096 with a live fire obstacle breach and combined infantry and armoured assault also involving combat engineers from the 3rd Combat Engineer Regiment (3CER) conducting an explosives enabled breach in defences. They created two separate gaps that allowed the armour and mechanised infantry to pour through in spectacular fashion during the combined attack supported by an offensive support plan from the gunners of 4th Regiment, Royal Regiment of Australian Artillery."},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/","name":"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 1) | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-11-17T19:00:16+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-17T09:35:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 1)"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f","name":"Graeme Dobell","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Graeme Dobell"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dobell\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51948"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/79"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51948"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51948\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51951,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51948\/revisions\/51951"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51949"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}