{"id":52009,"date":"2019-11-20T06:00:58","date_gmt":"2019-11-19T19:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=52009"},"modified":"2019-11-19T17:48:44","modified_gmt":"2019-11-19T06:48:44","slug":"reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 2)"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Australian defence reviews always wail about fuzzy accountability and indirect responsibility.<\/p>\n

The critique was immortalised by Defence Department Secretary Allan Hawke,\u00a0back in 2000, when he decried \u2018a culture of learned helplessness<\/a> among some Defence senior managers\u2014both military and civilian. Their perspective is one of disempowerment.\u2019<\/p>\n

Hawke described the problem this way:<\/p>\n

Putting the budget\/financial situation to one side, the most significant organisational issue we face relates to leadership. Not to put too fine a point on it, too many of our people lack confidence in many of Defence\u2019s senior leaders. Justified or not, Defence\u2019s leadership is seen as lacking coherence, as failing to accept responsibility and as reactive. Issues such as visibility and caring arise.<\/p>\n

Far too often, it seems that wherever one sits in the hierarchy, all the problems besetting the organisation in terms of its management and leadership come from higher up the ladder.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Defence had \u2018been through massive change that is often not well appreciated\u2019, Hawke said. His version of the department as a big beast<\/a> was that it was \u2018far too inwardly focussed\u2019. Yet the beast had trouble understanding its own \u2018mission, vision and values\u2019. The rest of government, he noted, was equally puzzled:<\/p>\n

The reality today \u2026 is that there is widespread dissatisfaction with Defence\u2019s performance in Canberra\u2014from ministers, central agencies within the public service, industry, and even from within the Defence organisation itself. In essence, we have a credibility problem.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Many reviews later, consider today\u2019s newest \u2018learned helplessness\u2019 attack. Hugh White\u2019s How to defend Australia<\/a><\/em> stirred so much controversy that not much attention was paid to his call for a \u2018savage cut\u2019 to the beast he once rode as a deputy secretary.<\/p>\n

White sets up his assault with this aside: \u2018It is a sobering reality that anyone attempting to understand defence management should start with the works of C. Northcote Parkinson<\/a>, especially Parkinson\u2019s Law<\/em>.\u2019 The law states that \u2018work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion\u2019. The naval historian built his satirical analysis on two sublaws<\/a>: the Law of Multiplication of Subordinates and the Law of Multiplication of Work. Later he added further edicts such as one on triviality<\/a>, observing that organisations spend disproportionate time and effort on minor matters.<\/p>\n

White judges that Australia has a record of failed defence reforms. Benchmarked against Singapore, Israel and France, he writes, Australia doesn\u2019t get value for money. The reviews \u2018have not delivered big long-term savings and seem to have done nothing to redress the poor performance\u2019.<\/p>\n

A key reason defence is less efficient, White argues, is complacency. Our leaders and the military and civilian hierarchies have assumed \u2018that Australia does not really face serious strategic risks, because we can always rely on the Americans\u2019.<\/p>\n

White wants to spend a lot more money bulking up the body of the beast, but make its head smaller:<\/p>\n

One organisational reform which might make a real difference is a savage cut to the size of the civilian and military staffs in defence headquarters on Russell Hill … [W]e would get better decisions faster if a lot fewer people were involved. The big benefit here is not that we need fewer people on the payroll; it\u2019s that we get better decisions about big strategic questions.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The beast has a fine record of discipline. Efficiency is tougher, not least because Defence lives in arcane and difficult places; that\u2019s why private-sector business-based answers can offer only partial answers.<\/p>\n

Rigour in the thinking matters because in conflict even simple things are hard. And that thinking has to reach beyond the best strategy to guard an affluent and stable nation with its own continent.<\/p>\n

In an era of great-power contest, where the international system strains and sags, Canberra frets at \u2018the most consequential changes in the global environment<\/a> since WWII\u2019 pushing at the prosperity and stability of the Indo-Pacific.<\/p>\n

Australia needs its beast to be both strong and nimble. So, now for another review<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Because of the unpredictable times, Defence Minister Linda Reynolds<\/a> announced Defence will do a \u2018hard-headed assessment\u2019 of what needs to change:<\/p>\n

\u2013 What changes we need to make to our strategy;<\/p>\n

\u2013 What changes we need to make to our capability [although Reynolds also said, \u2018I do not envisage any changes to our major capability programs\u2019]; and<\/p>\n

\u2013 [H]ow we transform Defence into an organisation that can deliver on the national tasks for the decades ahead.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The buzz word is transformation. The aim is to \u2018transform Defence into a truly adaptive One Defence\u2019, Senator Reynolds said, to make it \u2018a far more strategy-led organisation\u2019.<\/p>\n

The 2015 first principles review<\/a> had got \u2018the Defence enterprise aligned at the starting line of \u2026 an ongoing transformation process\u2019, Reynolds said. \u2018The next step is to define this new, more adaptive strategy framework, to ensure One Defence is agile in responding to current circumstances.\u2019<\/p>\n

The review will be delivered to the minister early next year.<\/p>\n

The times demand more of the beast. Time, again, to transform the beast.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Australian defence reviews always wail about fuzzy accountability and indirect responsibility. The critique was immortalised by Defence Department Secretary Allan Hawke,\u00a0back in 2000, when he decried \u2018a culture of learned helplessness among some Defence senior …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":79,"featured_media":52010,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[38,346,110,700],"class_list":["post-52009","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-department-of-defence","tag-leadership","tag-reform","tag-review"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nReviewing the Department of Defence (part 2) | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 2) | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Australian defence reviews always wail about fuzzy accountability and indirect responsibility. The critique was immortalised by Defence Department Secretary Allan Hawke,\u00a0back in 2000, when he decried \u2018a culture of learned helplessness among some Defence senior ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-19T19:00:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-19T06:48:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/20190924adf8443968_318-e1574144097337.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"900\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"601\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Graeme Dobell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Graeme Dobell\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/20190924adf8443968_318-e1574144097337.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/20190924adf8443968_318-e1574144097337.jpg\",\"width\":900,\"height\":601,\"caption\":\"Minister for Defence Senator the Honourable Linda Reynolds CSC, at the acceptance ceremony for the Australian Army\u0092s first Boxer vehicle at Enoggera Barracks, Brisbane. *** Local Caption *** On 24 September 2019 the Minister for Defence, Senator the Hon Linda Reynolds CSC, Minister for Defence Industry, the Hon Melissa Price MP, Deputy Secretary Defence Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group, Tony Fraser, Chief of Army, Lieutenant General Rick Burr, AO, DSC, MVO; Head of Armoured Vehicle Division, Major General David Coghlan, AM, Managing Director, Rheinmetall Global Head Vehicle Systems, Ben Hudson and German Ambassador to Australia, His Excellency Dr Thomas Fitschen, welcomed the first Boxer vehicle for the LAND 400 Phase 2 Combat Reconnaissance Vehicle at a ceremony at Enoggera Barracks in Brisbane. The LAND 400 program will provide the Australian Army with a fleet of modern armoured fighting vehicles characterised by increased levels of protection, lethality and mobility. The new vehicles will be equipped with modern and highly capable sensors and communications suites which will ensure the new vehicles remain a potent weapon system over the next 30 years. LAND 400 Phase 2 is scoped to acquire 211 Boxer 8x8 Combat Reconnaissance Vehicles Drive Modules and 223 Mission Modules to replace the Australian Light Armoured Vehicle.\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/\",\"name\":\"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 2) | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-19T19:00:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-19T06:48:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 2)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f\",\"name\":\"Graeme Dobell\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Graeme Dobell\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dobell\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 2) | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 2) | The Strategist","og_description":"Australian defence reviews always wail about fuzzy accountability and indirect responsibility. The critique was immortalised by Defence Department Secretary Allan Hawke,\u00a0back in 2000, when he decried \u2018a culture of learned helplessness among some Defence senior ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2019-11-19T19:00:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-19T06:48:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":900,"height":601,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/20190924adf8443968_318-e1574144097337.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Graeme Dobell","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Graeme Dobell","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/20190924adf8443968_318-e1574144097337.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/20190924adf8443968_318-e1574144097337.jpg","width":900,"height":601,"caption":"Minister for Defence Senator the Honourable Linda Reynolds CSC, at the acceptance ceremony for the Australian Army\u0092s first Boxer vehicle at Enoggera Barracks, Brisbane. *** Local Caption *** On 24 September 2019 the Minister for Defence, Senator the Hon Linda Reynolds CSC, Minister for Defence Industry, the Hon Melissa Price MP, Deputy Secretary Defence Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group, Tony Fraser, Chief of Army, Lieutenant General Rick Burr, AO, DSC, MVO; Head of Armoured Vehicle Division, Major General David Coghlan, AM, Managing Director, Rheinmetall Global Head Vehicle Systems, Ben Hudson and German Ambassador to Australia, His Excellency Dr Thomas Fitschen, welcomed the first Boxer vehicle for the LAND 400 Phase 2 Combat Reconnaissance Vehicle at a ceremony at Enoggera Barracks in Brisbane. The LAND 400 program will provide the Australian Army with a fleet of modern armoured fighting vehicles characterised by increased levels of protection, lethality and mobility. The new vehicles will be equipped with modern and highly capable sensors and communications suites which will ensure the new vehicles remain a potent weapon system over the next 30 years. LAND 400 Phase 2 is scoped to acquire 211 Boxer 8x8 Combat Reconnaissance Vehicles Drive Modules and 223 Mission Modules to replace the Australian Light Armoured Vehicle."},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/","name":"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 2) | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2019-11-19T19:00:58+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-19T06:48:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reviewing-the-department-of-defence-part-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Reviewing the Department of Defence (part 2)"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f","name":"Graeme Dobell","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Graeme Dobell"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dobell\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52009"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/79"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52009"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52009\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52012,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52009\/revisions\/52012"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52010"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52009"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52009"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}