{"id":53936,"date":"2020-03-02T13:28:51","date_gmt":"2020-03-02T02:28:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=53936"},"modified":"2020-03-02T15:19:41","modified_gmt":"2020-03-02T04:19:41","slug":"are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/","title":{"rendered":"Are Defence\u2019s shipbuilding job numbers all shipshape?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

\u2018I\u2019m also very confident in terms of the methodologies that have been developed and refined over the course of many of these projects and I\u2019m very confident in the fidelity of the data that we have.\u2019<\/p>\n

\u2014 Minister for Defence Linda Reynolds, Supplementary budget estimates hearings, 29 November 2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The October<\/a> and November<\/a> 2019 Senate estimates hearings for the Department of Defence followed a familiar pattern: extended discussion about the number of Australian jobs associated with projects for building and sustaining naval vessels and an outcome that did little to clarify many, or even most, of the numbers involved.<\/p>\n

To begin with, there was considerable confusion at the hearings about the meaning of key indicators of employment. \u2018Direct jobs\u2019 cover the people employed by prime contractors and their subcontractors, working in dockyards or associated facilities. \u2018Indirect jobs\u2019, sometimes described as \u2018flow-on jobs\u2019, consist of jobs supporting the provision of all other Australian inputs along project supply chains.<\/p>\n

But projects also generate jobs in other areas of the economy. One category that wasn\u2019t mentioned at the hearings is \u2018consumption-induced jobs\u2019, which are jobs created in businesses that sell consumer goods and services to people working on projects. The skills associated with those jobs can differ markedly from the skills required for naval shipbuilding and sustainment.<\/p>\n

Another category is jobs that come from spillovers. A \u2018spillover\u2019 is a new technology or skill created by a project that other areas of the economy use to generate employment of their own. Because that employment is extraordinarily difficult to quantify, it\u2019s not covered in Defence\u2019s job figures. At the hearings, that point wasn\u2019t made as clearly as it might have been.<\/p>\n

Not surprisingly, direct jobs are often estimated by prime contractors. But neither a prime nor Defence normally has insight into the far reaches of supply chains and beyond, especially during the early phases of projects. Consequently, indirect jobs tend to be estimated initially using economic models and refined later as more project-specific data becomes available. Consumption-induced jobs are estimated solely through economic modelling.<\/p>\n

Senators at the hearings were interested primarily in two sets of job numbers covering direct and indirect employment for shipbuilding and sustainment\u2014one for 2025 and the other for all years of Defence\u2019s naval shipbuilding plan<\/a> expressed as an annual average (see table 1). For both sets, the data provided by Defence falls short of what\u2019s required for adequate coverage and categorisation.<\/p>\n

Table 1: Shipbuilding and sustainment jobs by key category<\/strong><\/p>\n


\nn.a. = not available.
\n* The precise figures for direct shipbuilding jobs in 2025 are difficult to determine, partly due to confusion about whether the correct year is 2025 or 2026. At the October hearing, a figure of 5,200 was initially provided for 2025 (page 15 of transcript<\/a>) but later increased to 5,800 (page 16). The latter figure was made up of 5,200 for the future frigates and future submarines and 600 for the Pacific patrol boats and offshore patrol vessels. However, further testimony from Defence (pages 73\u201374) indicated that in 2025 the future frigate program (1,452) and future submarine program (1,341) would together support 2,793 direct jobs rather than 5,200\u2014suggesting that either the 5,200 figure was incorrect or Defence had defined direct shipbuilding jobs to include additional project-related activity like facilities construction or sustainment.<\/p>\n

There are three additional limitations to consider. First, Defence\u2019s figures include a substantial number of jobs carried over from previous projects. That obscures the all-important<\/a> issue of how aggregate employment numbers will change. Carryover is especially significant for sustainment\u2014a problem that also applies to recent official announcements<\/a> on job creation for military vehicle assembly.<\/p>\n

Second, \u00a0the annual averages for shipbuilding are based on the implicit and untested<\/a> assumption that companies constructing the Pacific patrol boats and the offshore patrol vessels will secure equivalent follow-on work in the medium to long term.<\/p>\n

Third, Defence said at the October hearing that its estimates of indirect jobs contain supply chain jobs only. Relevant economic modelling suggests those figures also incorporate a substantial consumption-induced employment effect, at least for larger build projects (see table 2). Consumption-induced jobs add to employment across the economy\u2014but not in naval shipbuilding and sustainment.<\/p>\n

Table 2: Ratio of direct to indirect jobs in naval shipbuilding and sustainment<\/strong><\/figure>\n


\nn.a. = not available; n\/a = not applicable.
\n* Weighted average.
\nSources:
\n1. ACIL Tasman, Naval shipbuilding and through life support<\/em><\/a>, report to Australian Industry Group, 2013, 17.
\n2. BIS Oxford Economics, The economic contribution of BAE Systems in Australia<\/em><\/a>, 2018, 24.
\n3. Department of Defence, <\/em>Building submarines in Australia\u2014aspects of economic impact<\/em><\/a>, 2015, 5.
\n4. Figures based on contribution to Canada\u2019s GDP for all Canadian defence industry, not just shipbuilding. Binyam Soloman and Christopher E. Penny, \u2018Canada\u2019s defence industrial base\u2019 in Keith Hartley and Jean Belin (eds), The economics of the global defence industry<\/em><\/a>, Routledge, 2020, 445. Data also available here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

If those three limitations hold, I estimate additional or \u2018new\u2019 jobs will account for around one-third of the total number of jobs that naval shipbuilding and sustainment are expected to support in the period ahead. That support covers an estimated 15,000 jobs, <\/a>measured on an annual average basis. The remaining two-thirds consists of numbers for jobs carried over from previous Defence projects, in serious doubt or created in non-defence areas of the economy. All those figures are maxima since they exclude the impact on national employment of the economic costs<\/a> associated with paying for and resourcing<\/a> projects.<\/p>\n

There was also some confusion at the October hearing about a total job figure for the future frigate build of 6,300 attributed to former minister Christopher Pyne. That figure is substantially higher than Defence\u2019s current figure of 4,000. The department claims<\/a> that the difference between the two figures is attributable to the Pyne figure including consumption-induced employment.<\/p>\n

An alternative, and perhaps more likely, explanation is that the 6,300 jobs relate to 2028\u2014the project\u2019s first year at peak production\u2014and that Defence\u2019s figure of 4,000 is an annual average \u2018smoothed\u2019 across peak and non-peak levels of project activity. The problem of Defence juxtaposing annual average data and peak annual data extends to the department\u2019s testimony in October that direct jobs for the future frigates of 1,500 (an annual average figure) will approach 2,500 (a peak annual figure) by 2028.<\/p>\n

Finally, taken at face value, Defence\u2019s estimates paint a picture of job creation that\u2019s counterintuitive: the future frigate build generating many more jobs than the much larger future submarine build (see table 3).<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, that\u2019s difficult to assess without additional data including an indication of each project\u2019s Australian content. The assumed levels of domestic content underpinning Defence\u2019s job estimates for most build projects weren\u2019t presented at the hearings and haven\u2019t been disclosed elsewhere.<\/p>\n

Table 3: Comparison of job creation for future frigates and future submarines<\/strong><\/figure>\n

\"\"
\nn.a. = not available.
\n1. Estimates vary of the Australian content associated with this project, from a 50% minimum, to 58% contracted, to 65\u201370% predicted by the contractor (see Senate estimates, 5 April 2019, answer to question on notice 43<\/a>).
\n2. The spend period of 2018\u20132048 was used by BIS Oxford Economics, The economic contribution of BAE Systems in Australia<\/em><\/a>, 2018, 22, to estimate employment for the future frigates.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u2018I\u2019m also very confident in terms of the methodologies that have been developed and refined over the course of many of these projects and I\u2019m very confident in the fidelity of the data that we …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":698,"featured_media":53958,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[126,1429,1051,579],"class_list":["post-53936","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-defence-industry","tag-future-frigate","tag-future-submarine-project","tag-shipbuilding"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAre Defence\u2019s shipbuilding job numbers all shipshape? | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Are Defence\u2019s shipbuilding job numbers all shipshape? | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u2018I\u2019m also very confident in terms of the methodologies that have been developed and refined over the course of many of these projects and I\u2019m very confident in the fidelity of the data that we ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-03-02T02:28:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-03-02T04:19:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/1434599149276-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"713\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"401\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Rob Bourke\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Rob Bourke\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/1434599149276-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/1434599149276-1.jpg\",\"width\":713,\"height\":401},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/\",\"name\":\"Are Defence\u2019s shipbuilding job numbers all shipshape? | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-03-02T02:28:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-03-02T04:19:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/1ba8707272188d53bf6497ec25f4e92d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Are Defence\u2019s shipbuilding job numbers all shipshape?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/1ba8707272188d53bf6497ec25f4e92d\",\"name\":\"Rob Bourke\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/26c3ae8ba9ab34cfa364ffc75a0b1282?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/26c3ae8ba9ab34cfa364ffc75a0b1282?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Rob Bourke\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/rob-bourke\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Are Defence\u2019s shipbuilding job numbers all shipshape? | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Are Defence\u2019s shipbuilding job numbers all shipshape? | The Strategist","og_description":"\u2018I\u2019m also very confident in terms of the methodologies that have been developed and refined over the course of many of these projects and I\u2019m very confident in the fidelity of the data that we ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2020-03-02T02:28:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-03-02T04:19:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":713,"height":401,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/1434599149276-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Rob Bourke","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Rob Bourke","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/1434599149276-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/1434599149276-1.jpg","width":713,"height":401},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/","name":"Are Defence\u2019s shipbuilding job numbers all shipshape? | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2020-03-02T02:28:51+00:00","dateModified":"2020-03-02T04:19:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/1ba8707272188d53bf6497ec25f4e92d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/are-defences-shipbuilding-job-numbers-all-shipshape\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Are Defence\u2019s shipbuilding job numbers all shipshape?"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/1ba8707272188d53bf6497ec25f4e92d","name":"Rob Bourke","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/26c3ae8ba9ab34cfa364ffc75a0b1282?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/26c3ae8ba9ab34cfa364ffc75a0b1282?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Rob Bourke"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/rob-bourke\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53936"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/698"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53936"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53936\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":53983,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53936\/revisions\/53983"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/53958"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53936"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53936"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53936"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}