{"id":55374,"date":"2020-04-27T14:31:21","date_gmt":"2020-04-27T04:31:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=55374"},"modified":"2020-04-28T09:11:42","modified_gmt":"2020-04-27T23:11:42","slug":"the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/","title":{"rendered":"The Chinese state and Australia\u2019s economy: \u2018snapping back\u2019 must not mean business as usual"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

The one thing Australia can\u2019t do as we get the pandemic under control is \u2018snap back\u2019 to the old ways of doing business with the one-party state that is the People\u2019s Republic of China.<\/p>\n

The fundamental design and operation of China\u2019s authoritarian government, and the way it\u2019s running the massive chunk of the world\u2019s economy and environment it controls, mean it will deliver us more large shocks.<\/p>\n

The Chinese Communist Party is motivated by self-protection and self-preservation at all costs\u2014whether those costs are borne by China\u2019s 1.4\u00a0billion people or by the citizens of other nations.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s why officials covered up the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, threatened doctors<\/a> and downplayed the risk of human-to-human transmission<\/a> as they locked down Wuhan<\/a>. And it\u2019s why the Chinese government criticised others<\/a> for banning travel while instituting severe travel restrictions at home.<\/p>\n

The CCP prioritised its survival over the health of its own people and of the rest of us\u2014and it will always take that approach.<\/p>\n

The 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre demonstrated this design principle at work. The CCP turned its armed wing, the People\u2019s Liberation Army, on its own people because, by calling for participation in political decision-making, they threatened the party\u2019s rule. Last year, China\u2019s defence minister said the massacre was correct policy<\/a>, implying he\u2019d do it again. The clampdowns in Hong Kong\u2014continuing<\/a> amid the pandemic\u2014and the mass detention of Uyghurs in Xinjiang are other examples.<\/p>\n

The spread of HIV\/AIDS through botched<\/a> blood-collection programs and the contaminated food and tainted baby formula scandals<\/a>\u00a0are all examples of mismanagement brought on by the corruption and distortions of CCP rule.<\/p>\n

The 2003 SARS epidemic and now Covid-19 are part of this long heritage of adverse consequence as the party\u2019s obsessive self-protection instinct wins out over the people\u2019s wellbeing.<\/p>\n

In the globalisation model that Australia and others have adopted, almost all manufactured products, including those needed in a public health emergency, are produced by a vulnerable chain of global relationships. The supply chains wend their way into and through China, bringing inordinate risks.<\/p>\n

Before the Covid-19 crisis, we treated the Chinese state as an externality, which meant we didn\u2019t need to factor it in to our decision-making while we all made a lot of money.<\/p>\n

That allowed us to ignore the effects of Chinese state actions on our own level of risk and wellbeing. The clearest case at the government level was Premier Daniel Andrews\u2019s decision to sideline national security issues as he\u2019s sought to tie Victoria deeper and deeper<\/a> with the Chinese economy and provided window dressing for Beijing\u2019s signature strategic influence program, the Belt and Road Initiative.<\/p>\n

In economics, externalities are great when someone else is managing them, but when no one is taking care of them they can be extraordinarily damaging. Covid-19 is in the latter category. Every government and company that outsourced pandemic prevention and preparedness to the World Health Organization and relied<\/a> on reassuring but misleading statements from Chinese state authorities has now experienced what happens when an externality comes home to roost.<\/p>\n

With Covid-19, the Chinese state has created unacceptable risks for the rest of us and it will continue to do so unless it changes or until we reduce our dependence on activities within its jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s the underlying driver of the strong bipartisan signal Australia\u2019s foreign minister Marise Payne<\/a> and her opposition counterpart Penny Wong<\/a> sent recently about needing to know what happened in China at the start of the pandemic.<\/p>\n

All of this may sound obvious, but economists and policymakers are strange creatures. As the pandemic recedes, we\u2019ll find on display the stickiness of policy thinking in the government, corporate and university arenas that makes them reluctant to change approaches even when the environment changes.<\/p>\n

So, as the world slowly gets back to business, expect myriad calls to restart our economic relationship with China as it was before, or to double down on it as the \u2018bridge back\u2019 to prosperity.<\/p>\n

In some sectors, notably resources, where we\u2019re the seller and Chinese firms are the buyers, we can probably resume much as we were without adverse consequences for us or for the Chinese, depending, of course, on the strength of Chinese demand. But that will not be a general recipe for success in our changed world.<\/p>\n

The calls for a return to the past will come from treasury types in Western governments as well as those with deep self-interest\u2014a lot of wealthy people and leaders sprinkled across our corporate and university landscapes. But we can\u2019t pretend that the Chinese state can be returned to its pre-Covid-19 place in our minds.<\/p>\n

The \u2018China inevitabilists\u2019 will also return to the stage, saying that somehow the glaring failings and weaknesses that created the conditions for the global pandemic and economic depression are actually demonstrations of China\u2019s unstoppable rise. They\u2019ll probably even believe this.<\/p>\n

Alcoholics Anonymous pegged this type of thinking correctly when it adopted the adage<\/a> that insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. While we should expect to hear the voices of rusted-on self-interest advocating that we maintain or even increase our dependence on China, we must discount them as we make decisions.<\/p>\n

Instead, \u2018snapping back\u2019 means using what we\u2019ve done to cope with the pandemic to create new forms of prosperity and security for Australians. Our institutions, government agencies and civil society are not some failing, fading Western model on the brink of being replaced by resurgent authoritarian alternatives.<\/p>\n

We\u2019ve shown that Australian institutions, companies and society are able to rise to a challenge that many others have failed to meet. We can make what we need here when pressed to do so. We can become a leading digital economy if we keep the practices we\u2019ve developed during this time of socially distant work. We can take and implement better decisions than many other places.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s snap back to being a nation that controls its own economic destiny. Let\u2019s build partnerships with those we can rely on in crises and increase our ability to do what we need to do and to make what we need to make in times of challenge, civil or military.<\/p>\n

Australia has unique strengths we haven\u2019t yet tapped, including the wealth in our superannuation savings. This can work with government stimulus to create the new economy we can see growing out of this crisis.<\/p>\n

This positive focus on future wellbeing, security and prosperity is exciting. It\u2019s time to do something different, to stop putting more and more of our economic and security destiny in the hands of the Chinese Communist Party.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The one thing Australia can\u2019t do as we get the pandemic under control is \u2018snap back\u2019 to the old ways of doing business with the one-party state that is the People\u2019s Republic of China. The …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":766,"featured_media":55375,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2212,1383,759,983],"class_list":["post-55374","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australia-china-relations","tag-ccp","tag-globalisation","tag-pandemic","dinkus-coronavirus"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe Chinese state and Australia\u2019s economy: \u2018snapping back\u2019 must not mean business as usual | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Chinese state and Australia\u2019s economy: \u2018snapping back\u2019 must not mean business as usual | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The one thing Australia can\u2019t do as we get the pandemic under control is \u2018snap back\u2019 to the old ways of doing business with the one-party state that is the People\u2019s Republic of China. The ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-04-27T04:31:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-04-27T23:11:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/GettyImages-930426686.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Michael Shoebridge\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Michael Shoebridge\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/GettyImages-930426686.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/GettyImages-930426686.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":683,\"caption\":\"BEIJING, CHINA - MARCH 11: Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Zhang Dejiang (R) bends to Chinese President Xi Jinping (top right corner) prior to his speech and following a vote to repeal presidential term limits during the third plenary session of the first session of the 13th National People's Congress (NPC) at The Great Hall of People on March 11, 2018 in Beijing, China. China's parliament voted on March 11 to abolish presidential term limits, clearing the path for President Xi Jinping to rule for life. (Photo by Etienne Oliveau\/Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/\",\"name\":\"The Chinese state and Australia\u2019s economy: \u2018snapping back\u2019 must not mean business as usual | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-04-27T04:31:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-04-27T23:11:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/b7802124e14835ff19b5c244e962849f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Chinese state and Australia\u2019s economy: \u2018snapping back\u2019 must not mean business as usual\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/b7802124e14835ff19b5c244e962849f\",\"name\":\"Michael Shoebridge\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9ad669e65739d5a3f4bbc0e839d8a6b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9ad669e65739d5a3f4bbc0e839d8a6b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Michael Shoebridge\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/michael-shoebridge\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Chinese state and Australia\u2019s economy: \u2018snapping back\u2019 must not mean business as usual | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Chinese state and Australia\u2019s economy: \u2018snapping back\u2019 must not mean business as usual | The Strategist","og_description":"The one thing Australia can\u2019t do as we get the pandemic under control is \u2018snap back\u2019 to the old ways of doing business with the one-party state that is the People\u2019s Republic of China. The ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2020-04-27T04:31:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-04-27T23:11:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/GettyImages-930426686.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Michael Shoebridge","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Michael Shoebridge","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/GettyImages-930426686.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/GettyImages-930426686.jpg","width":1024,"height":683,"caption":"BEIJING, CHINA - MARCH 11: Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Zhang Dejiang (R) bends to Chinese President Xi Jinping (top right corner) prior to his speech and following a vote to repeal presidential term limits during the third plenary session of the first session of the 13th National People's Congress (NPC) at The Great Hall of People on March 11, 2018 in Beijing, China. China's parliament voted on March 11 to abolish presidential term limits, clearing the path for President Xi Jinping to rule for life. (Photo by Etienne Oliveau\/Getty Images)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/","name":"The Chinese state and Australia\u2019s economy: \u2018snapping back\u2019 must not mean business as usual | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2020-04-27T04:31:21+00:00","dateModified":"2020-04-27T23:11:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/b7802124e14835ff19b5c244e962849f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-chinese-state-and-australias-economy-snapping-back-must-not-mean-business-as-usual\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Chinese state and Australia\u2019s economy: \u2018snapping back\u2019 must not mean business as usual"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/b7802124e14835ff19b5c244e962849f","name":"Michael Shoebridge","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9ad669e65739d5a3f4bbc0e839d8a6b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9ad669e65739d5a3f4bbc0e839d8a6b8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Michael Shoebridge"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/michael-shoebridge\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55374"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/766"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55374"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55374\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":55392,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55374\/revisions\/55392"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/55375"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}