{"id":59200,"date":"2020-09-21T06:00:20","date_gmt":"2020-09-20T20:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=59200"},"modified":"2020-09-21T11:14:30","modified_gmt":"2020-09-21T01:14:30","slug":"tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/","title":{"rendered":"Tit for tat and the costs of attacking journalism"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Australia started the journalist war with China.<\/p>\n

Tit-for-tat logic made it inevitable that Australian journalists in China would pay the price.<\/p>\n

Hard questions should be asked about Canberra\u2019s thinking on the costs and consequences of raiding Chinese journalists in Australia.<\/p>\n

A dismaying Canberra mindset\u2014shaped by politics, secrecy and security\u2014views journalism as a disagreeable, troublesome bit of our democracy.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, our politicians, minders, officials, judges and cops repeatedly prove the truth of Tom Stoppard\u2019s line: \u2018I\u2019m with you on the free press<\/a>. It\u2019s the newspapers I can\u2019t stand<\/a>.\u2019<\/p>\n

Love the principle; just disdain the people and the press that practise it. Canberra\u2019s secrecy obsession feeds on security fears<\/a> and it\u2019s all bad news for the hacks.<\/p>\n

My argument is not that there\u2019s some moral equivalence<\/a> between China and Australia in the way they treat journalists. Rather than false equivalence, Australia should hold itself to the much higher democratic standards we proclaim.<\/p>\n

Add to proper Australian standards the question of judgement and an apparent lack of smarts by Canberra about consequences.<\/p>\n

Raiding Chinese journalists in the same way Australian journalists were raided <\/a>last year demanded a Chinese response. We didn\u2019t expel four Chinese journalists but we showed them the door.<\/p>\n

The lore of diplomacy that became tacit law during the Cold War states that if you kick out my diplomats or journalists, I do the same to you. That lore\/law has been on vivid display in a big tit for tat between the US and China.<\/p>\n

In February, Beijing expelled<\/a> three Wall Street Journal<\/em> reporters\u2014the first foreign correspondents ordered to leave China since 1998. The Journal<\/em>\u2019s alleged offence was a commentary under the headline, \u2018China is the real sick man of Asia\u2019<\/a>. Then Washington cut<\/a> to 100 the number of Chinese citizens allowed to work in the US for five state-controlled Chinese news organisations. China responded by expelling <\/a>journalists (including Australians) working for the New York Times<\/em>, the Wall Street Journal<\/em> and the Washington Post<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Plenty of fresh lore\/law to show Australia what\u2019d happen if it went after Chinese journalists. Oz journalists in China would be hit, and Beijing plays this harder and harsher than we do.<\/p>\n

Consider the timeline of our journalist war.<\/p>\n

On 26 June, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation searched the homes<\/a> of Chinese journalists, warning the reporters that under Australian law they couldn\u2019t make public the fact of the raids.<\/p>\n

The \u2018you must be silent\u2019 instruction makes the strange point that it\u2019s better for a journo to be done over by the federal police than by ASIO. At least with the wallopers, you can still talk. ASIO takes you to the hall of mirrors inside the cone of silence.<\/p>\n

After the ASIO questioning, the Australia bureau chief of China News Service, Tao Shelan, China Radio International\u2019s Sydney bureau chief, Li Dayong, and two other Chinese journalists left Australia. Not expelled, mind, just fled.<\/p>\n

It was left to Chinese media to break the silence<\/a>, with this from China News Service:<\/p>\n

At dawn of June 26 this year, Australian law enforcement officers conducted an unprovoked search on the residences of four journalists from three Chinese media organisations in Australia on the grounds of alleged violations of Australia\u2019s Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Act.<\/p>\n

Items such as mobile phones, computers and writing materials were seized.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

On 7 July, Australia\u2019s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade issued new travel advice warning Australians they may face \u2018arbitrary detention<\/a>\u2019 for allegedly \u2018endangering national security\u2019 if they visit China. Canberra was voicing its hostage diplomacy fears.<\/p>\n

On 14 August, Australia was informed<\/a> of the detention of Cheng Lei, an Australian citizen who is a \u2018high-profile, respected business journalist<\/a>\u2019 for the state-controlled China Global Television Network. China has announced that Cheng is suspected of criminal activity endangering China\u2019s national security.<\/p>\n

Such detention is a \u2018rare event\u2019<\/a> and this appears to be the first involving a foreigner, according to former Australian ambassador to Beijing Geoff Raby, who observes: \u2018It\u2019s not an accidental or random incident in China when they decide to take action like this.\u2019<\/p>\n

Raby says Cheng is \u2018a very experienced journalist\u2019 who has \u2018done the job for a long time in China\u2019. He told the BBC<\/a> her reporting was \u2018thoroughly objective\u2019, and she worked within the constraints of the state broadcaster to be as fair as possible.<\/p>\n

On 2 September, Ministry of State Security officers came knocking<\/a> on the door of the ABC\u2019s Bill Birtles, in Beijing, and the Australian Financial Review<\/em>\u2019s Michael Smith, in Shanghai. Full marks to Australia\u2019s diplomats who negotiated the deal that got the two correspondents on a plane to Australia<\/a> on 7 September, after police had interviewed the two about their links to Cheng Lei.<\/p>\n

The questioning on Cheng, however, was perfunctory<\/a>. As Birtles commented: \u2018I think the whole thing was premeditated by the Chinese government. They wanted to get us out without expelling us. It\u2019s a good outcome for China\u2014now there is no Australian media on the ground in China.\u2019<\/p>\n

Action by Australia may have played a part in China\u2019s detention of Cheng. It\u2019ll be an interesting moment in a Senate estimates hearing when DFAT is asked whether it was consulted on the diplomatic repercussions of raiding Chinese journalists. I dread either answer: DFAT wasn\u2019t asked, or it was asked and ignored.<\/p>\n

A Canberra wise owl with much experience of the system, Allan Behm, offers<\/a> this dry truth: \u2018It is difficult to imagine that DFAT would have advised an ASIO \u201craid\u201d on Chinese journalists in June.\u2019<\/p>\n

On truth or consequences, Canberra has done poorly.<\/p>\n

In dealing with its Oz journalists<\/a>, Australia hasn\u2019t met its own standards on the fundamental truths of press freedom. In weighing the consequences of actions against Chinese journalists, Canberra has been low on smarts, perhaps even cavalier.<\/p>\n

An old warning applies: in waging the fight, don\u2019t become what you\u2019re fighting.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Australia started the journalist war with China. Tit-for-tat logic made it inevitable that Australian journalists in China would pay the price. Hard questions should be asked about Canberra\u2019s thinking on the costs and consequences of …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":79,"featured_media":59206,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2212,2595,333,730],"class_list":["post-59200","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australia-china-relations","tag-foreign-interference","tag-journalism","tag-media"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nTit for tat and the costs of attacking journalism | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tit for tat and the costs of attacking journalism | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Australia started the journalist war with China. Tit-for-tat logic made it inevitable that Australian journalists in China would pay the price. Hard questions should be asked about Canberra\u2019s thinking on the costs and consequences of ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-09-20T20:00:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-09-21T01:14:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/chenglei1809.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"631\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Graeme Dobell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Graeme Dobell\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/chenglei1809.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/chenglei1809.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":631},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/\",\"name\":\"Tit for tat and the costs of attacking journalism | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-20T20:00:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-09-21T01:14:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tit for tat and the costs of attacking journalism\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f\",\"name\":\"Graeme Dobell\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Graeme Dobell\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dobell\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tit for tat and the costs of attacking journalism | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tit for tat and the costs of attacking journalism | The Strategist","og_description":"Australia started the journalist war with China. Tit-for-tat logic made it inevitable that Australian journalists in China would pay the price. Hard questions should be asked about Canberra\u2019s thinking on the costs and consequences of ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2020-09-20T20:00:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-09-21T01:14:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":631,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/chenglei1809.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Graeme Dobell","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Graeme Dobell","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/chenglei1809.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/chenglei1809.jpg","width":1000,"height":631},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/","name":"Tit for tat and the costs of attacking journalism | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2020-09-20T20:00:20+00:00","dateModified":"2020-09-21T01:14:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/tit-for-tat-and-the-costs-of-attacking-journalism\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tit for tat and the costs of attacking journalism"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f","name":"Graeme Dobell","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Graeme Dobell"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dobell\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59200"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/79"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59200"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59200\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59228,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59200\/revisions\/59228"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/59206"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59200"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59200"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59200"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}