{"id":59455,"date":"2020-10-01T06:00:57","date_gmt":"2020-09-30T20:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=59455"},"modified":"2020-09-30T17:27:12","modified_gmt":"2020-09-30T07:27:12","slug":"assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/","title":{"rendered":"Assessing the economic benefits of defence procurement: how hard can it be?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

In early August, the Finance Department issued a revised set<\/a> of guidelines for Australia\u2019s federal departments and agencies to apply when assessing the economic benefit of procuring high-value goods and services. Given the intense controversy<\/a> surrounding how the Defence Department measures economic benefits when purchasing major items of capital equipment, the revised approach is of considerable interest.<\/p>\n

In terms of overarching principles, the revised guidance begin in much the same way as the original<\/a> introduced just a few years ago. An economic benefit arises when a procurement boosts national productivity, typically in areas in which Australian industry enjoys a comparative advantage. Any evaluation of benefits should have regard to the effective and efficient use of government funds.<\/p>\n

For a benefit to emerge, suppliers should therefore be price competitive and rely for their production on resources that would otherwise be unemployed or substantially underemployed. On that basis, productivity improvement isn\u2019t normally fostered when a significant price premium is paid for preferring one source of supply over another or when supply draws resources\u2014like skilled labour\u2014away from equally productive, or even more productive, areas of the economy.<\/p>\n

But even if price premiums and resource constraints apply\u2014which is frequently the case for defence projects\u2014a (net) economic benefit might still be obtained if production of the good or service being procured is a relatively promising source of new knowledge in the form of technologies or workforce skills that \u2018spill over\u2019 to improve productivity elsewhere. So far, so good.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, that\u2019s where certainty under the revised guidelines ends and the search for meaning begins. That\u2019s because the revised guidelines go beyond the sources of economic benefit noted above to include a set of, undefined and unweighted, \u2018broader benefits\u2019 associated with the development and sustainment of industrial capabilities, including those accorded sovereign status by Defence.<\/p>\n

Under the new guidelines, \u2018broader benefits\u2019 for defence projects are treated as separate from the most obvious and significant forms of economic benefit, linked to the notion of sovereignty and treated as if they alone can determine the outcome of a benefit evaluation. From that, it seems projects offering negligible\u2014or even no\u2014national economic benefits might still satisfy the revised guidelines if they deliver a regional economic gain, a socioeconomic gain or even a non-economic gain in the form of a military\u2013strategic advantage.<\/p>\n

If an economic gain of any kind needs to be addressed by Defence under the revised guidelines, several aspects of its measurement appear to lie beyond the department\u2019s analytic capabilities. One is the supply chain effects of projects, which tend to focus on the contribution of small to medium-sized enterprises. Another is how many of the inputs used by projects have alternative opportunities for employment. Finally, the department is unlikely to be able to estimate by itself whether the resources that projects need originate from industries with lower\u2014or higher\u2014levels of productivity.<\/p>\n

Fortunately, all three aspects fall should within the range of economic models readily available from consultants. However, those models provide no insight into spillovers. As a result, Defence is likely to carry primary responsibility for assessing what could be the single largest source<\/a> of economic benefit to arise from its procurements. As the Productivity Commission<\/a> has pointed out in a defence context, \u2018It is easier to assert that spillovers will eventuate than to prove they have.\u2019 That seems to be supported by recent experience.<\/p>\n

On the rare occasions when Defence has attempted to gauge the spillover-related savings in sustainment from preferring domestic over foreign assembly of capital equipment, its methods have attracted<\/a> considerable<\/a> criticism<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The two latest attempts at estimating economic impact commissioned by Defence\u2014for the F-35 fighter jets<\/a> and combat reconnaissance vehicles<\/a>\u2014reference the potential for spillovers but offer little, if any, supporting evidence. A similar situation has emerged in relation to the most recent research, commissioned by industry, into the economic impact of naval shipbuilding<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Several factors complicate any attempt by Defence to assess spillovers. Judgements must be made well before equipment projects mature. There appears to be limited historical evidence in an Australian defence environment from which to draw. And the responsibility for assessments may rest with departmental procurement managers unfamiliar with the methodologies<\/a> that underpin how spillovers should be estimated.<\/p>\n

There are many stakeholders interested in how implementation of the revised guidelines unfolds\u2014especially in what \u2018broader benefits\u2019 entail, whether robust estimates of economic benefit will emerge and how those estimates might be weighed against demands for industrial sovereignty.<\/p>\n

In the absence of far greater clarity on those issues, it is difficult to see how the latest revisions do much to overcome our limited understanding of how investing in defence capital equipment affects \u2018jobs and growth\u2019. Indeed, in their current form, the guidelines may substantially reduce the public\u2019s visibility of important issues associated with defence industry protection.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In early August, the Finance Department issued a revised set of guidelines for Australia\u2019s federal departments and agencies to apply when assessing the economic benefit of procuring high-value goods and services. Given the intense controversy …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":698,"featured_media":59458,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[44,17,1114,126],"class_list":["post-59455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australian-defence-force","tag-australia","tag-defence","tag-defence-industry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAssessing the economic benefits of defence procurement: how hard can it be? | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Assessing the economic benefits of defence procurement: how hard can it be? | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In early August, the Finance Department issued a revised set of guidelines for Australia\u2019s federal departments and agencies to apply when assessing the economic benefit of procuring high-value goods and services. Given the intense controversy ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-09-30T20:00:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-09-30T07:27:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/f35engine3009.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"818\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Rob Bourke\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Rob Bourke\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/f35engine3009.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/f35engine3009.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":818},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/\",\"name\":\"Assessing the economic benefits of defence procurement: how hard can it be? | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-30T20:00:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-09-30T07:27:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/1ba8707272188d53bf6497ec25f4e92d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Assessing the economic benefits of defence procurement: how hard can it be?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/1ba8707272188d53bf6497ec25f4e92d\",\"name\":\"Rob Bourke\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/26c3ae8ba9ab34cfa364ffc75a0b1282?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/26c3ae8ba9ab34cfa364ffc75a0b1282?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Rob Bourke\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/rob-bourke\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Assessing the economic benefits of defence procurement: how hard can it be? | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Assessing the economic benefits of defence procurement: how hard can it be? | The Strategist","og_description":"In early August, the Finance Department issued a revised set of guidelines for Australia\u2019s federal departments and agencies to apply when assessing the economic benefit of procuring high-value goods and services. Given the intense controversy ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2020-09-30T20:00:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-09-30T07:27:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":818,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/f35engine3009.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Rob Bourke","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Rob Bourke","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/f35engine3009.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/f35engine3009.jpg","width":1200,"height":818},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/","name":"Assessing the economic benefits of defence procurement: how hard can it be? | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2020-09-30T20:00:57+00:00","dateModified":"2020-09-30T07:27:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/1ba8707272188d53bf6497ec25f4e92d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/assessing-the-economic-benefits-of-defence-procurement-how-hard-can-it-be\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Assessing the economic benefits of defence procurement: how hard can it be?"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/1ba8707272188d53bf6497ec25f4e92d","name":"Rob Bourke","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/26c3ae8ba9ab34cfa364ffc75a0b1282?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/26c3ae8ba9ab34cfa364ffc75a0b1282?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Rob Bourke"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/rob-bourke\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59455"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/698"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59455"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59455\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59461,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59455\/revisions\/59461"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/59458"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}