{"id":60069,"date":"2020-10-29T11:31:48","date_gmt":"2020-10-29T00:31:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=60069"},"modified":"2020-10-29T11:32:14","modified_gmt":"2020-10-29T00:32:14","slug":"cyber-enabled-foreign-interference-in-elections-on-the-rise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/cyber-enabled-foreign-interference-in-elections-on-the-rise\/","title":{"rendered":"Cyber-enabled foreign interference in elections on the rise"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Foreign governments\u2019 efforts to interfere in the elections and referendums of other countries, and more broadly to undermine other political systems, are an enduring practice of statecraft. Over the past decade, the scale and methods through which such interference occurs has changed, with state actors exploiting the digitisation of election systems, election administration and election campaigns to influence voters and voter turnout, manipulate the information environment and weaken public trust in democratic processes.<\/p>\n

The proliferation of actors involved in elections and the digitisation of election functions has dramatically widened the attack surface available to those who seek to disrupt democracy. This has in large part been facilitated by the pervasive and persistent growth of social media and networking platforms, which has made target populations more accessible to foreign state actors and exposed them \u2018in a new, \u201cneutral\u201d medium, to the very old arts of persuasion or agitation\u2019<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Our new research report, Cyber-enabled foreign interference in elections and referendums<\/em><\/a>, published by ASPI\u2019s International Cyber Policy Centre<\/a>, identifies 41 elections and 7 referendums between January 2010 and October 2020 where cyber-enabled foreign interference has been reported, and it finds that there\u2019s been a significant uptick in this activity since 2017.<\/p>\n

Figure 1: Cases of cyber-enabled foreign interference, by year and type of political process<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/figure>\n

The data we collected (see our map<\/a>) shows that Russia is the most prolific state actor engaging in cyber-enabled election interference, followed by China, Iran and North Korea. All four have sought to interfere in the 2020 US presidential election using differing cyber-enabled foreign interference tactics.<\/p>\n

Their activity can be divided into two attack vectors:<\/p>\n