{"id":6140,"date":"2013-05-08T11:00:30","date_gmt":"2013-05-08T01:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=6140"},"modified":"2013-05-09T08:24:28","modified_gmt":"2013-05-08T22:24:28","slug":"hadr-in-search-of-low-cost-innovative-solutions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/hadr-in-search-of-low-cost-innovative-solutions\/","title":{"rendered":"HADR: in search of low-cost innovative solutions"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Private<\/a><\/figure>\n

In financially-constrained times we need to think of innovative ways to promote useful but low-cost security cooperation in our region. Developing Australia\u2019s capacity to provide emergency food relief would enhance our international reputation and support closer security ties.<\/p>\n

Australia\u2019s\u00a0desire for closer engagement with Asia has been a prominent and largely bipartisan priority during the last decade, albeit with occasional divergence in approach and emphasis. While the Howard Government was guided by the principles of \u2018shared interests and mutual respect<\/em>,\u2019 Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd surprised the region in 2008 with grand plans for an Asia-Pacific union by 2020<\/a>. Mr Rudd\u2019s announcement failed to resonate with regional neighbours, who saw it as a threat to ASEAN\u2019s patiently-constructed regional architecture.<\/p>\n

Since the 2010 Federal Election, Australia\u2019s regional diplomacy has been less revolutionary and more focused on nudging multilateral cooperation down a more practical path. Cooperating under the banner of humanitarian assistance and disaster relief<\/a> (HADR), has gained prominence in the aftermath of natural disasters in Pakistan, Indonesia and Japan.\u00a0It’s seen as a relatively non-contentious way to promote military-to-military interaction and consequently resonates in regional policy circles. Multilateral security agendas have increasingly focussed on:<\/p>\n