{"id":64578,"date":"2021-05-19T15:23:40","date_gmt":"2021-05-19T05:23:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=64578"},"modified":"2021-05-19T15:32:16","modified_gmt":"2021-05-19T05:32:16","slug":"australias-china-debate-has-too-little-focus-on-xis-destabilising-words-and-actions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-china-debate-has-too-little-focus-on-xis-destabilising-words-and-actions\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia\u2019s \u2018China debate\u2019: Time to end domestic politicking and focus on Xi\u2019s destabilising words and actions"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Shadow foreign minister Penny Wong has criticised the government over public discussion of the potential for a war with China starting over Taiwan, characterising it as the government seeking domestic political advantage.<\/p>\n

Even though Wong\u2019s speech<\/a> at a Canberra book launch included protestations of structural bipartisanship, it\u2019s a risky and unfortunate path to take at a time when Australia desperately needs a cohesive national policy on China.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s been hugely valuable for Australia that the big decisions that have protected Australian interests in managing the now obvious risks in our engagement with China have been backed by both sides of politics. They include:<\/p>\n