{"id":64663,"date":"2021-05-24T15:12:02","date_gmt":"2021-05-24T05:12:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=64663"},"modified":"2021-06-11T16:41:02","modified_gmt":"2021-06-11T06:41:02","slug":"b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/","title":{"rendered":"B-21 bomber could be Australia\u2019s best long-range strike option"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

The government\u2019s 2020 defence strategic update provided refreshing clarity about Australia\u2019s deteriorating strategic environment and the need for new military capabilities to address it.<\/p>\n

These include long-range strike capabilities to impose greater cost on potential great-power adversaries at greater range from Australia. The government also included a shopping list of those capabilities giving a broad outline of schedule and the scale of investment.<\/p>\n

But there\u2019s a big gap between where we are today and where we need to be, and the shopping list crosses that gap achingly slowly. In the vast reaches of the Indo-Pacific, range is crucial and the Australian Defence Force\u2019s long-range strike cupboard is bare.<\/p>\n

The F-35A has an effective combat radius of about 1,000 kilometres. That can be boosted to about 1,500 kilometres with the use of expensive and vulnerable tanker aircraft. But even that doesn\u2019t cover much of our neighbourhood. It\u2019s also easily out-ranged by Chinese missiles\u2014it doesn\u2019t matter how good the F-35A is if it\u2019s taken out on the ground or its bases are destroyed.<\/p>\n

The navy doesn\u2019t have much to offer either. Its six submarines provide only two for operations, which doesn\u2019t guarantee one on station to our north. They can only carry a few strike missiles and once they\u2019re fired, it\u2019s a one-month turnaround back to Australia to reload. And on the current Attack-class submarine schedule, it could be close to 2040 before the number of boats in our submarine fleet grows.<\/p>\n

With the government providing Defence with $575 billion over the coming decade, the department has to do better at getting effective strike capability into service sooner.<\/p>\n

One option that could deliver formidable long-range strike power well before the future submarines arrive are bombers. It\u2019s strange that bombers don\u2019t get much attention as a military option for Australia, considering we have a long history operating them. We flew bombers out of northern Australia during World War II against the Japanese to telling effect, and it was only a decade ago that the F-111, long a mainstay of Australia\u2019s deterrent capability, was retired.<\/p>\n

The only real candidate for a crewed long-range bomber is the B-21 stealth bomber, currently under development in the US and planned to enter service late this decade. Remarkably for a developmental project, the B-21 seems to be roughly on schedule and on budget by leveraging the technologies used in earlier stealth aircraft projects. It\u2019s using two F-35 engines, for example, but it will have three or four times the range of the F-35. That will allow it to reach far out into the Indo-Pacific, greatly complicating the planning of any adversary operating against us or our friends. It also means it can be based deep inside Australia, far from threats, and still not need to rely on tanker support.<\/p>\n

If Australia had a squadron of 12 B-21s, it could dispatch a flight of three aircraft carrying around 30 long-range anti-ship missiles in the morning and follow it up with another in the afternoon. Unlike submarines, bombers can do it all again the next day. If the mission was to strike ground targets, they could each carry 50 guided bombs.<\/p>\n

Granted, bombers can\u2019t do everything that submarines can do (and the reverse is also the case). But they can potentially deliver similar results differently, for example by destroying enemy submarines in port, rather than hunting them down at sea. Or by dropping sophisticated sea mines off an enemy\u2019s naval bases.<\/p>\n

Certainly, that kind of capability doesn\u2019t come cheap. The US is aiming for a unit price under $1 billion. A squadron of 12 aircraft will likely total around $20\u201325 billion once we add in bases, support systems such as simulators and maintenance facilities, and so on. That\u2019s a lot, but compared to the $45 billion to be spent on future frigates, the $89 billion on submarines or indeed the $30 billion on armoured vehicles, it\u2019s a price worth considering. Deploying a B-21 would also mean sending a crew of two into danger, as opposed to more than 60 on an Attack-class submarine or 180 on a future frigate.<\/p>\n

Of course, if we buy B-21s from the US, not a lot of money will be spent here on local industry in their acquisition. But the Defence budget shouldn\u2019t be seen primarily as an industry program. At any rate, the bulk of spending over the life of a military aircraft is in its sustainment, and much of that will be spent here.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s one other potential option; a Goldilocks solution with greater range than the F-35 but less capability and cost than the B-21. It would involve developing a bigger, multi-engined version of the loyal wingman uncrewed combat aircraft recently test flown by Boeing Australia. That would take a commitment from the government and Defence to invest in its development, as well as trust that autonomous systems can deliver lethal effects at long range.<\/p>\n

But we could pursue both approaches as an insurance policy to hedge against the risks we are facing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The government\u2019s 2020 defence strategic update provided refreshing clarity about Australia\u2019s deteriorating strategic environment and the need for new military capabilities to address it. These include long-range strike capabilities to impose greater cost on potential …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":767,"featured_media":64666,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[44,2436,2628,726],"class_list":["post-64663","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australian-defence-force","tag-attack-class","tag-b-21","tag-raaf"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nB-21 bomber could be Australia\u2019s best long-range strike option | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"B-21 bomber could be Australia\u2019s best long-range strike option | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The government\u2019s 2020 defence strategic update provided refreshing clarity about Australia\u2019s deteriorating strategic environment and the need for new military capabilities to address it. These include long-range strike capabilities to impose greater cost on potential ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-05-24T05:12:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-11T06:41:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/b21shed2405.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"626\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marcus Hellyer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Marcus Hellyer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/b21shed2405.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/b21shed2405.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":626},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/\",\"name\":\"B-21 bomber could be Australia\u2019s best long-range strike option | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-05-24T05:12:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-11T06:41:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/87e4e7561c0d7071411d7d635b9e32c1\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"B-21 bomber could be Australia\u2019s best long-range strike option\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/87e4e7561c0d7071411d7d635b9e32c1\",\"name\":\"Marcus Hellyer\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ab3d49a0ff8e79106b3af65880612804?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ab3d49a0ff8e79106b3af65880612804?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Marcus Hellyer\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/marcus-hellyer\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"B-21 bomber could be Australia\u2019s best long-range strike option | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"B-21 bomber could be Australia\u2019s best long-range strike option | The Strategist","og_description":"The government\u2019s 2020 defence strategic update provided refreshing clarity about Australia\u2019s deteriorating strategic environment and the need for new military capabilities to address it. These include long-range strike capabilities to impose greater cost on potential ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2021-05-24T05:12:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-06-11T06:41:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":626,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/b21shed2405.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Marcus Hellyer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Marcus Hellyer","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/b21shed2405.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/b21shed2405.jpg","width":1000,"height":626},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/","name":"B-21 bomber could be Australia\u2019s best long-range strike option | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2021-05-24T05:12:02+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-11T06:41:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/87e4e7561c0d7071411d7d635b9e32c1"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"B-21 bomber could be Australia\u2019s best long-range strike option"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/87e4e7561c0d7071411d7d635b9e32c1","name":"Marcus Hellyer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ab3d49a0ff8e79106b3af65880612804?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ab3d49a0ff8e79106b3af65880612804?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Marcus Hellyer"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/marcus-hellyer\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64663"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/767"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64663"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64663\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65077,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64663\/revisions\/65077"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64666"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}