{"id":67090,"date":"2021-09-10T06:00:59","date_gmt":"2021-09-09T20:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=67090"},"modified":"2021-09-09T17:06:59","modified_gmt":"2021-09-09T07:06:59","slug":"time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/","title":{"rendered":"Time for less rhetoric and more substance from Australia\u2013South Korea ministerial talks"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

There\u2019s been a strong focus on the upcoming AUSMIN talks between Australia\u2019s defence and foreign ministers and their US counterparts and calls for Australia to press the US robustly to deliver more substantive Indo-Pacific and defence exports policies.<\/p>\n

That has to some extent overshadowed important meetings with Indonesia, India and South Korea that are about to take place and which approach the same issues from a different direction.<\/p>\n

Next week\u2019s meeting<\/a> of Australian and South Korean foreign and defence ministers, the fifth in a series, provides an opportunity to lend more content to the process. That\u2019s made easier because both are capable US allies, both belong to the Indo-Pacific and are substantial trade partners, and both face some similar geostrategic challenges. In the wake of the poorly planned and executed US departure from Afghanistan, calls among NATO partners in Europe, and allies in Asia and Australia, for greater self-reliance and regional coalition-building have grown. The Australia\u2013Korea 2+2 meeting is an opportunity to give this some substance.<\/p>\n

When a less capable South Korea faced the continuing North Korean threat, it couldn\u2019t have been expected to focus much beyond the peninsula. But that has changed, and South Korea today has the capability, if not always the intent, to undertake wider missions supporting stability in the Indo-Pacific and elsewhere. It\u2019s become a significant participant in UN peacekeeping and US-led counter-piracy operations in the northern Indian Ocean.<\/p>\n

But as a RAND Corporation study<\/a> argued in 2019, \u2018South Korea\u2019s defence cooperation is often seen as more piecemeal than as part of a consistent strategic approach to foreign policy aimed at binding the Indo-Pacific together; expanding the ROK\u2019s [Republic of Korea\u2019s] influence; and reinforcing shared norms, values and intents.\u2019<\/p>\n

There are two parts to this problem. Each new Korean administration seems to find it politically necessary to ditch foreign policy initiatives of its predecessor and to embark on new ones. Hence, in 2017 the Moon Jae-In administration\u2019s \u2018New Southern Policy<\/a>\u2019 replaced its predecessor\u2019s \u2018Northeast Asia Peace and Cooperation Initiative<\/a>\u2019. A consistent strategic approach is a casualty of Seoul\u2019s sharply divided left\u2013right politics, lessening its influence and, in the case of the NSP, is more about trade competition and diversification than about Korea pulling its strategic weight with its like-minded partners.<\/p>\n

The other part is the imperative Korea feels to be seen to \u2018balance\u2019 between China, its biggest trade partner and near neighbour, and its longstanding ally the United States.<\/p>\n

Like Australia, Korea has felt the harsh impact of Chinese economic coercion, with far-reaching measures imposed following its 2016 agreement to host a US THAAD anti-missile battery. And Seoul, correctly, considers Beijing to be critical in managing the ever-present North Korean threat.<\/p>\n

But Korea\u2019s balancing act can minimise the importance of its other regional interests, including the critical sea lines of communication through the South China Sea, along which much of the country\u2019s highly trade-dependent imports and exports flow.<\/p>\n

Its inability to heal historical rifts with Japan also inhibits the development of cooperation with Japan, the US and others which might serve to better monitor and balance China\u2019s assertive policies in North and Southeast Asia.<\/p>\n

More of South Korea\u2019s friends are stepping up in East Asia to respond to the challenge of China. Australia, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK have all recently sent naval units to the region.<\/p>\n

Pressure is mounting on Korea, not least from the US, to play a more supportive role in ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific. Moon\u2019s reluctant preparedness to associate with the non-military elements of the Quad responded to this pressure. Korea\u2019s ambassador to Australia recently acknowledged that the Quad is an \u2018important anchor for stability\u2019, but Korea remains wary of military arrangements with others that could provoke further Chinese anger.<\/p>\n

All four previous Australia\u2013Korea 2+2 meetings have been marked by lengthy joint statements of shared views on a wide range of contemporary issues and wordy, generalised commitments \u2018to strengthen cooperation to address current and evolving security in an increasingly uncertain strategic environment\u2019, to \u2019work to address challenges\u2019 and to \u2018continue identifying opportunities for further collaboration in areas of mutual interest\u2019.<\/p>\n

Strategic dialogues and service-to-service talks seem at times to be a substitute for real work on interoperability and common purpose. It\u2019s difficult to discern from the biennial blizzard of diplomatic speak whether much progress has in fact materialised from these earnest declarations over the past eight years.<\/p>\n

A memorandum of understanding on defence research, development, testing and evaluation was signed in 2019, with potential work on maritime robotics identified. Korea participated, at a very modest level, in Australia\u2019s Exercise Talisman Sabre this year. Both are certainly small steps forward. The biennial naval anti-submarine warfare exercise Haedoli Wallaby continues to be the centrepiece of bilateral defence exercising. But there hasn\u2019t been much interest on either side in expanding the scope or frequency of exercises or service-to service collaboration outside of the separate UN Command annual exercises.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, Australia has committed to purchasing 30 Korean self-propelled howitzers, and Korea\u2019s Hanwha is one of two companies bidding for Australia\u2019s next generation of armoured personnel carriers. But as the RAND study noted, Korea\u2019s defence exports are not coordinated or promoted as part of a broader strategic policy. A serious promotional effort might include proposals to lift the level of ambition in the defence relationship.<\/p>\n

As in Australia, Korean public opinion has turned decisively against China, running well ahead of government policy. A conservative administration in Korea after next year\u2019s presidential election could be more receptive to expanded defence relationships, even if formal accession to the Quad may still be considered a step too far and likely to further provoke China.<\/p>\n

Australia has yet to take South Korea more seriously as an important element in our declared intention to build our regional defence relationships. The rapidity of strategic change both countries face in the region suggests now might be the time for them to seed substance into the 2+2. Another year of pious declarations of \u2018identifying opportunities\u2019 or \u2018seeking to enhance training and exercises\u2019 without real content devalues the currency and raises questions about commitment on both sides.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There\u2019s been a strong focus on the upcoming AUSMIN talks between Australia\u2019s defence and foreign ministers and their US counterparts and calls for Australia to press the US robustly to deliver more substantive Indo-Pacific and …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1193,"featured_media":67093,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[17,52,294,211],"class_list":["post-67090","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australia","tag-china","tag-diplomacy","tag-south-korea"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nTime for less rhetoric and more substance from Australia\u2013South Korea ministerial talks | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Time for less rhetoric and more substance from Australia\u2013South Korea ministerial talks | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"There\u2019s been a strong focus on the upcoming AUSMIN talks between Australia\u2019s defence and foreign ministers and their US counterparts and calls for Australia to press the US robustly to deliver more substantive Indo-Pacific and ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-09-09T20:00:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-09-09T07:06:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/20180910ran8538476_138.t5bbeb087.m1200.x7JArW-TYbII5ElCb-e1631170866857.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"668\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bill Paterson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bill Paterson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/20180910ran8538476_138.t5bbeb087.m1200.x7JArW-TYbII5ElCb-e1631170866857.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/20180910ran8538476_138.t5bbeb087.m1200.x7JArW-TYbII5ElCb-e1631170866857.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":668},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/\",\"name\":\"Time for less rhetoric and more substance from Australia\u2013South Korea ministerial talks | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-09-09T20:00:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-09-09T07:06:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/d00453805cf82fcb5b41987380b65e9c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Time for less rhetoric and more substance from Australia\u2013South Korea ministerial talks\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/d00453805cf82fcb5b41987380b65e9c\",\"name\":\"Bill Paterson\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6595edbfc056e9f259d36daedbd57ea9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6595edbfc056e9f259d36daedbd57ea9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bill Paterson\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/bill-paterson\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Time for less rhetoric and more substance from Australia\u2013South Korea ministerial talks | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Time for less rhetoric and more substance from Australia\u2013South Korea ministerial talks | The Strategist","og_description":"There\u2019s been a strong focus on the upcoming AUSMIN talks between Australia\u2019s defence and foreign ministers and their US counterparts and calls for Australia to press the US robustly to deliver more substantive Indo-Pacific and ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2021-09-09T20:00:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-09-09T07:06:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":668,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/20180910ran8538476_138.t5bbeb087.m1200.x7JArW-TYbII5ElCb-e1631170866857.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bill Paterson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bill Paterson","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/20180910ran8538476_138.t5bbeb087.m1200.x7JArW-TYbII5ElCb-e1631170866857.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/20180910ran8538476_138.t5bbeb087.m1200.x7JArW-TYbII5ElCb-e1631170866857.jpg","width":1000,"height":668},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/","name":"Time for less rhetoric and more substance from Australia\u2013South Korea ministerial talks | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2021-09-09T20:00:59+00:00","dateModified":"2021-09-09T07:06:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/d00453805cf82fcb5b41987380b65e9c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/time-for-less-rhetoric-and-more-substance-from-australia-south-korea-ministerial-talks\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Time for less rhetoric and more substance from Australia\u2013South Korea ministerial talks"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/d00453805cf82fcb5b41987380b65e9c","name":"Bill Paterson","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6595edbfc056e9f259d36daedbd57ea9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6595edbfc056e9f259d36daedbd57ea9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bill Paterson"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/bill-paterson\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67090"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1193"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67090"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67090\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":67094,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67090\/revisions\/67094"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/67093"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67090"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67090"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}