{"id":68236,"date":"2021-10-30T06:00:25","date_gmt":"2021-10-29T19:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=68236"},"modified":"2021-10-30T06:03:22","modified_gmt":"2021-10-29T19:03:22","slug":"australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 needed to pull off nuclear submarine plan"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

A multi-disciplinary taskforce is recruiting \u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 to tackle the herculean task of providing the Royal Australian Navy with eight nuclear-powered submarines, acquiring the technical skills the nation doesn\u2019t yet have to maintain them, and training highly specialised crews to drive them.<\/p>\n

Given the immense complexity of this project revealed in September\u2019s bombshell announcement by US President Joe Biden and Australian and UK prime ministers Scott Morrison and Boris Johnson, and the scale of Australia\u2019s strategic shift, those sharp minds will have their work cut out.<\/p>\n

Whatever promises have been made, the hardest part of this arrangement will be convincing the United States that, from close to a standing start, Australia is capable of assembling the skills to be trusted with the stewardship of America\u2019s most precious and closely guarded military and nuclear secrets.<\/p>\n

Hundreds of Australian sailors will need to develop nuclear engineering skills and a national infrastructure will have to be created to accommodate and service Australia\u2019s nuclear-powered boats and those of its allies.<\/p>\n

Building that sort of nuclear capability will take a decade or more. And whatever gaps in Australia\u2019s submarine capability appear during this process will have to be filled.<\/p>\n

The creation of a new trilateral security partnership\u2014AUKUS\u2014involving the US, United Kingdom and Australia with a first goal of providing those submarines was a remarkable turnround in the very few years since US representatives consistently declared that their naval nuclear technology wouldn\u2019t be shared even with as close an ally as Australia. They\u2019d only done that once before\u2014with Britain in 1958, at the height of the Cold War.<\/p>\n

After the unveiling of this closely held secret, the head of ASPI\u2019s defence, strategy and national security program, Michael Shoebridge, was quick to note<\/a> that this had all become possible because of the dramatic change in the global strategic situation wrought by an increasingly aggressive China.<\/p>\n

As recently as 2016, Australia chose a conventional, diesel-powered submarine as its key undersea weapon, to be built in partnership with the French.<\/p>\n

\u2018A nuclear submarine was ruled out then because of the sensitivity of military nuclear technologies, the complexity and cost, and because we were told our strategic needs would be met by the diesel submarine,\u2019 Shoebridge said. \u2018The sensitivity, complexity and cost remain. What\u2019s changed is our security environment. That\u2019s summed up in three words: China under Xi.\u2019<\/p>\n

On the day of the announcement, White House officials briefed journalists on the importance of Australia having nuclear-powered submarines that were fast, discreet, with extremely long range and able to operate closely with the US undersea fleet. They stressed the complexity of the project and the difficulty of progressing it from its infancy.<\/p>\n

That would start with an 18-month effort by technical, strategic and navy teams from all three countries to work out how this can be done.<\/p>\n

The decision followed months of high-level negotiations carried out in secrecy and would mark the biggest strategic step that Australia had taken in generations.<\/p>\n

\u2018This allows Australia to play at a much higher level and to augment American capabilities that will be similar. And this is about maintaining peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific,\u2019 the US officials said<\/a>.<\/p>\n

They made it clear that this greater strategic role would see Australia aligned increasingly closely with the US for decades to come. They said the deal was \u2018huge\u2019 in Australia and negotiations were carried out with a high degree of discretion.<\/p>\n

In a bid to make up two decades of lost time, the government, Australia\u2019s defence establishment and naval shipbuilders in the US and Britain are fully alert to the massive scale of what they\u2019ve embarked on.<\/p>\n

Over long years, and diverse plans, trying to assemble a new fleet of submarines to ultimately replace the current fleet of Collins-class boats, Australia has badly upset the Swedes, the Germans, the Japanese and now the French.<\/p>\n

In the US, Morrison said<\/a> he made it very clear to the French months ago that a conventionally powered submarine would no longer meet Australia\u2019s strategic requirements and what these boats would need to do.<\/p>\n

\u2018That had been communicated very clearly many months ago,\u2019 Morrison said. \u2018We were working through those issues.\u2019<\/p>\n

If Morrison told French President Emmanuel Macron in June that Australia no longer required the Attack-class submarines, it appears that that information wasn\u2019t passed on their builder, Naval Group. And if it had been, it\u2019s likely that Naval Group would have assumed that it would be asked to provide Australia with the original nuclear-powered Barracuda that the Attack class was to be based on.<\/p>\n

The first of the nuclear-powered Barracudas, the Suffren<\/em>, was launched in Cherbourg in July 2019 with Australian naval representatives present.<\/p>\n

After Morrison\u2019s comments to Macron, the prospect of reversing the \u2018build us a conventionally powered submarine based on the design of your nuclear-powered one\u2019 process would have made perfect sense to the French. A lot of design work had already been done to marry up Australia\u2019s conventional version with the US combat system intended for it.<\/p>\n

The bit about Australia going nuclear with the Americans and the British seems to have been lost in translation.<\/p>\n

The genuine shock of the French when they learned that the contract would shift to the US or Britain, or both, couldn\u2019t have been greater than their surprise when they were originally asked to build us a submarine similar to their nuclear Barracuda but with a diesel\u2013electric system and a mass of batteries. In terms of performance, some have compared that with buying a Formula 1 racing car and replacing its engine with one from a small sedan\u2014which is why the Attack class could no longer be considered a \u2018regionally superior\u2019 design.<\/p>\n

Among the issues that remain unclear after the switch to the US and the UK under AUKUS is whether Australia will end up with an American nuclear-powered submarine or a British submarine that the Americans will help with. But the central source of the key technology is the US.<\/p>\n

Morrison announced that the eight submarines will be built in Adelaide.<\/p>\n

The American officials made it clear that the process of equipping the RAN with nuclear-powered submarines would be both challenging and important. \u2018Australia does not have a nuclear domestic infrastructure. They\u2019ve made a major commitment to go in this direction. This will be a sustained effort over years.\u2019<\/p>\n

Between February and September, Vice Admiral Jonathan Mead, now chief of the Nuclear-Powered Submarine Task Force, headed a \u2018defence capability enhancement review\u2019 working out what was possible in terms of getting Australia a more effective submarine.<\/p>\n

Now his multi-agency, whole-of-government taskforce has gathered well over 80 experts including nuclear energy specialists from the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation and the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency.<\/p>\n

\u2018We are,\u2019 Mead told a Senate committee, \u2018vigorously recruiting the sharpest minds in Australia to be part of the taskforce so we can deliver on the government\u2019s commitment.\u2019<\/p>\n

The US officials frankly declared that the nuclear submarines decision would mean much deeper interoperability among the US, UK and Australian navies and their nuclear infrastructures.<\/p>\n

This decision would bind Australia to the US and the UK decisively for generations.<\/p>\n

Defining the scale of this strategic development, Shoebridge said that Biden, Johnson and Morrison standing together (virtually) to announce AUKUS signalled a shift to a more robust deterrence of China by some of the world\u2019s most powerful and activist democracies. This is the huge geostrategic news behind the announcement\u2014and that will be understood in Beijing and the wider world.<\/p>\n

\u2018The long-term nature of the AUKUS partnership is the strongest possible statement that the challenge we face from China is equally long term\u2014no change of tone or even the shrewdest diplomacy is likely to change Xi\u2019s instinctive path and mindset of struggle. Deterrence by a growing set of powerful nations just might.\u2019<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A multi-disciplinary taskforce is recruiting \u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 to tackle the herculean task of providing the Royal Australian Navy with eight nuclear-powered submarines, acquiring the technical skills the nation doesn\u2019t yet have to maintain them, …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":587,"featured_media":68239,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3111,457,114],"class_list":["post-68236","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-aukus","tag-nuclear-submarines","tag-ran"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 needed to pull off nuclear submarine plan | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 needed to pull off nuclear submarine plan | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A multi-disciplinary taskforce is recruiting \u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 to tackle the herculean task of providing the Royal Australian Navy with eight nuclear-powered submarines, acquiring the technical skills the nation doesn\u2019t yet have to maintain them, ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-10-29T19:00:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-10-29T19:03:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/hmsastute2910.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"666\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Brendan Nicholson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Jerry Cashman\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Brendan Nicholson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/hmsastute2910.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/hmsastute2910.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":666,\"caption\":\"Pictured: An Astute Class Submarine on the surface. United Kingdom Carrier Strike Group 21 (CSG21) consists of multiple vessels from the UK as well as ships from the United States Navy and the Dutch Navy. One of those assets includes an Astute Class Submarine. Whilst operating within the Mediterranean an Astute Class submarine conducted a rare surface; to interact and exercise with HMS Queen Elizabeth and the task group. HMS Queen Elizabeth is the deployed flag ship for CSG21 will see the ship along with the Strike Group work with over 40 countries from around the world. The Strike Group will operate and exercise with other Countries Navies and Air Forces during the 7 month deployment. The Strike Group includes ships from the United States Navy, The Dutch Navy, and Marines from the US Marine Corps. As well as UK Frigates, Destroyers two RFA supply ships and air assets from 617 Sqn, 820 NAS, 815 NAS and 845 NAS. This will be the largest deployment of Fifth Generation Fighter Jets in history.\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 needed to pull off nuclear submarine plan | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-10-29T19:00:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-10-29T19:03:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/05899c3f9ed739cee652cbad02490edb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 needed to pull off nuclear submarine plan\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/05899c3f9ed739cee652cbad02490edb\",\"name\":\"Brendan Nicholson\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/432efb040ac92cb9a2cecaa148e1f70f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/432efb040ac92cb9a2cecaa148e1f70f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Brendan Nicholson\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Jerry Cashman\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/brendan-nicholson\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 needed to pull off nuclear submarine plan | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 needed to pull off nuclear submarine plan | The Strategist","og_description":"A multi-disciplinary taskforce is recruiting \u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 to tackle the herculean task of providing the Royal Australian Navy with eight nuclear-powered submarines, acquiring the technical skills the nation doesn\u2019t yet have to maintain them, ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2021-10-29T19:00:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-10-29T19:03:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":666,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/hmsastute2910.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Brendan Nicholson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Jerry Cashman","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Brendan Nicholson","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/hmsastute2910.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/hmsastute2910.jpg","width":1000,"height":666,"caption":"Pictured: An Astute Class Submarine on the surface. United Kingdom Carrier Strike Group 21 (CSG21) consists of multiple vessels from the UK as well as ships from the United States Navy and the Dutch Navy. One of those assets includes an Astute Class Submarine. Whilst operating within the Mediterranean an Astute Class submarine conducted a rare surface; to interact and exercise with HMS Queen Elizabeth and the task group. HMS Queen Elizabeth is the deployed flag ship for CSG21 will see the ship along with the Strike Group work with over 40 countries from around the world. The Strike Group will operate and exercise with other Countries Navies and Air Forces during the 7 month deployment. The Strike Group includes ships from the United States Navy, The Dutch Navy, and Marines from the US Marine Corps. As well as UK Frigates, Destroyers two RFA supply ships and air assets from 617 Sqn, 820 NAS, 815 NAS and 845 NAS. This will be the largest deployment of Fifth Generation Fighter Jets in history."},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/","name":"\u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 needed to pull off nuclear submarine plan | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2021-10-29T19:00:25+00:00","dateModified":"2021-10-29T19:03:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/05899c3f9ed739cee652cbad02490edb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-sharpest-minds-needed-to-pull-off-nuclear-submarine-plan\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Australia\u2019s sharpest minds\u2019 needed to pull off nuclear submarine plan"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/05899c3f9ed739cee652cbad02490edb","name":"Brendan Nicholson","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/432efb040ac92cb9a2cecaa148e1f70f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/432efb040ac92cb9a2cecaa148e1f70f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Brendan Nicholson"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/twitter.com\/Jerry Cashman"],"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/brendan-nicholson\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68236"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/587"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68236"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68236\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":68250,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68236\/revisions\/68250"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/68239"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68236"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68236"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}