{"id":69641,"date":"2021-12-27T06:00:34","date_gmt":"2021-12-26T19:00:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=69641"},"modified":"2021-12-23T17:44:49","modified_gmt":"2021-12-23T06:44:49","slug":"editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/","title":{"rendered":"Editors\u2019 picks for 2021: \u2018Australia\u2019s nuclear submarine decision leaves more questions than answers\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Originally published 30 September 2021.<\/em><\/p>\n

It is correct, as former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull\u00a0has asserted<\/a>, that few of the questions raised by the government\u2019s announcement that Australia will acquire nuclear-propelled submarines (SSNs) have been answered. The particular question he raised goes to the nature of the nuclear industry needed to support the submarines, but there are others that are just as essential to the success of the enterprise.<\/p>\n

On Turnbull\u2019s question, the government has suggested that the \u2018game-changer\u2019 enabling us to acquire SSNs is the development of reactors that don\u2019t need to be refuelled over the life of the submarines, meaning we don\u2019t need a civil nuclear industry to support them. However, operating submarines that don\u2019t need refuelling still requires a nuclear industry\u2014it just isn\u2019t the industry you might first imagine.<\/p>\n

We may not need civil nuclear power plants, or facilities that can enrich uranium to fuel the submarine\u2019s reactor, but we\u2019ll still need to perform maintenance and repair on the submarines, including the reactor. You can\u2019t have an effective military capability if you need to return it to the US any time there\u2019s a defect. Deeper maintenance will require putting the boats in dry dock and shutting down the reactor, working on it and starting it up again in an absolutely safe manner. We\u2019ll need to develop that maintenance workforce from a very low base.<\/p>\n

We\u2019ll also need an independent and highly skilled workforce that can establish and enforce the rigorous safety regime that is absolutely critical to the operation of a nuclear fleet. That regulatory workforce will need to be built almost from scratch and will need to be in place well before the first boat arrives.<\/p>\n

It may be possible to develop that workforce without a civil nuclear sector, but it\u2019s misleading to say we won\u2019t have a nuclear industry. Any enterprise where you are operating, shutting down, restarting and maintaining reactors\u2014all in a robust and trustworthy regulatory and safety environment\u2014is an industry. And much of that industry needs to be under Australian management\u2014otherwise, we won\u2019t have sovereign control of our most significant military capability.<\/p>\n

What is the scale of that workforce and how do we develop it? Hopefully in the year of discussions leading up to the government\u2019s announcement, the Department of Defence was able to develop a reasonable understanding of the answer to the question.<\/p>\n

But there are other unanswered questions that are just as critical to the success of the enterprise.<\/p>\n

First, with the first SSN not entering service until the late 2030s, how will we maintain an effective submarine capability? On that schedule, our Collins submarines will be older than the Indonesian submarine KRI\u00a0Nanggala<\/em>\u00a0that was lost with all hands in a training accident earlier this year.<\/p>\n

Second, what\u2019s it going to cost? The government has said it will cost more than the cancelled Attack class. A lot will depend on which boat we select and the size of the enabling industry and workforce. Fifty per cent more than the $90 billion for the Attack class could be a safe starting assumption.<\/p>\n

Third, what is the role of Australian industry in the building and sustainment of the SSNs? Australians would like to see a lot of that money stay here, but they also don\u2019t want to see requirements for Australian industry involvement slow down delivery and drive costs up.<\/p>\n

Fourth, how are we going to generate the much larger uniformed workforce needed to operate the new fleet? The US Navy\u2019s Virginia-class SSNs have a crew of about 130, compared with the Collins\u2019 56. We\u2019ll likely need at least twice as many submariners, so we\u2019ll have to dramatically grow their numbers while simultaneously imparting nuclear engineering skills so they can safely operate the boats.<\/p>\n

That gets to the final question. During the Attack-class program, many observers called for a Plan B due to its cost, schedule and capability. The government has now jumped from the previous Plan A to something completely different. But, in light of these unanswered questions, there are already calls for another Plan B in case the new plan doesn\u2019t deliver.<\/p>\n

Every time ASPI has looked at the path to acquiring nuclear boats we\u2019ve concluded that Australia still needs a new conventional submarine to ensure we can safely transition to a nuclear fleet. Yet the government has cancelled the Attack program and burned its bridges behind it. So, the final question is, what gives the government such confidence that this plan is going to work?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Originally published 30 September 2021. It is correct, as former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull\u00a0has asserted, that few of the questions raised by the government\u2019s announcement that Australia will acquire nuclear-propelled submarines (SSNs) have been answered. …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":767,"featured_media":67564,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3111,2425,457,114],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nEditors\u2019 picks for 2021: \u2018Australia\u2019s nuclear submarine decision leaves more questions than answers\u2019 | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Editors\u2019 picks for 2021: \u2018Australia\u2019s nuclear submarine decision leaves more questions than answers\u2019 | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Originally published 30 September 2021. It is correct, as former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull\u00a0has asserted, that few of the questions raised by the government\u2019s announcement that Australia will acquire nuclear-propelled submarines (SSNs) have been answered. ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-12-26T19:00:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-12-23T06:44:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/ssnhawaii2909.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"688\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Marcus Hellyer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Marcus Hellyer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/ssnhawaii2909.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/ssnhawaii2909.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":688},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/\",\"name\":\"Editors\u2019 picks for 2021: \u2018Australia\u2019s nuclear submarine decision leaves more questions than answers\u2019 | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-26T19:00:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-23T06:44:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/87e4e7561c0d7071411d7d635b9e32c1\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Editors\u2019 picks for 2021: \u2018Australia\u2019s nuclear submarine decision leaves more questions than answers\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/87e4e7561c0d7071411d7d635b9e32c1\",\"name\":\"Marcus Hellyer\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ab3d49a0ff8e79106b3af65880612804?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ab3d49a0ff8e79106b3af65880612804?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Marcus Hellyer\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/marcus-hellyer\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Editors\u2019 picks for 2021: \u2018Australia\u2019s nuclear submarine decision leaves more questions than answers\u2019 | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Editors\u2019 picks for 2021: \u2018Australia\u2019s nuclear submarine decision leaves more questions than answers\u2019 | The Strategist","og_description":"Originally published 30 September 2021. It is correct, as former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull\u00a0has asserted, that few of the questions raised by the government\u2019s announcement that Australia will acquire nuclear-propelled submarines (SSNs) have been answered. ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2021-12-26T19:00:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-12-23T06:44:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":688,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/ssnhawaii2909.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Marcus Hellyer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Marcus Hellyer","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/ssnhawaii2909.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/ssnhawaii2909.jpg","width":1200,"height":688},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/","name":"Editors\u2019 picks for 2021: \u2018Australia\u2019s nuclear submarine decision leaves more questions than answers\u2019 | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2021-12-26T19:00:34+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-23T06:44:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/87e4e7561c0d7071411d7d635b9e32c1"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/editors-picks-for-2021-australias-nuclear-submarine-decision-leaves-more-questions-than-answers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Editors\u2019 picks for 2021: \u2018Australia\u2019s nuclear submarine decision leaves more questions than answers\u2019"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/87e4e7561c0d7071411d7d635b9e32c1","name":"Marcus Hellyer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ab3d49a0ff8e79106b3af65880612804?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ab3d49a0ff8e79106b3af65880612804?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Marcus Hellyer"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/marcus-hellyer\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69641"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/767"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69641"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69641\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":69643,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69641\/revisions\/69643"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/67564"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69641"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69641"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69641"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}