{"id":71334,"date":"2022-03-21T14:30:35","date_gmt":"2022-03-21T03:30:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=71334"},"modified":"2022-03-21T14:00:37","modified_gmt":"2022-03-21T03:00:37","slug":"will-putins-war-force-more-medium-sized-states-to-seek-nuclear-weapons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/will-putins-war-force-more-medium-sized-states-to-seek-nuclear-weapons\/","title":{"rendered":"Will Putin\u2019s war force more medium-sized states to seek nuclear weapons?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Russian President Vladimir Putin\u2019s invasion of Ukraine has generated significant debate about deterrence, focused principally on Ukraine\u2019s non-membership of NATO and the extent to which its membership aspirations represent a legitimate security concern to Russia.<\/p>\n

But another salient detail has not escaped attention. In 1994, Ukraine agreed to destroy the nuclear stockpile\u2014the world\u2019s third largest\u2014it inherited from the dissolution of the Soviet Union, in exchange for security guarantees from Russia, the United States and the United Kingdom. The aim here is not to relitigate that decision; the point is that, deprived of the two gold standards of deterrence (its own nuclear weapons or a NATO membership card), Ukraine was invaded. That won\u2019t be lost on the handful of other medium-sized states trying to balance strategic interests in the shadow of menacing neighbours. In light of Putin\u2019s invasion, will more states seek the ultimate deterrent?<\/p>\n

To begin, let us define our terms. I have in mind states that satisfy the following criteria:<\/p>\n